PastaJoe Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Yeah. That happens a lot. Cindy Sheehan, for example... 599355[/snapback] Well they did convienently remove her from the State of the Union, and then gave an "Oops, we were wrong" afterwards. Do you really think that wasn't planned to remove her to avoid embarrasing Bush? Removing the Republican wife just helped provide cover.
KRC Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Well they did convienently remove her from the State of the Union, and then gave an "Oops, we were wrong" afterwards. Do you really think that wasn't planned to remove her to avoid embarrasing Bush? Removing the Republican wife just helped provide cover. 599361[/snapback] You can't actually believe the crap you type, can you? If so, you need to seek immediate therapy.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Well they did convienently remove her from the State of the Union, and then gave an "Oops, we were wrong" afterwards. Do you really think that wasn't planned to remove her to avoid embarrasing Bush? Removing the Republican wife just helped provide cover. 599361[/snapback] Yeah...because that and sending her to an Eastern European concentration camp are obviously the same !@#$ing thing, you nitwit. And knowing how the Capitol Police work...I doubt anything was planned.
PastaJoe Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Of course. Liberalism is ALL about double-standards. For example: "We should tolerate ALL religious views....so long as they're not evangelical Christianity." 599225[/snapback] Liberals tolerate all religions. The definition of liberal is "Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded." It's just when a religious group tries to legislate what they should or shouldn't do in their own private lives that it's a problem.
PastaJoe Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 You can't actually believe the crap you type, can you? If so, you need to seek immediate therapy. 599364[/snapback] Since it's not crap it's a moot question.
KRC Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Since it's not crap it's a moot question. 599370[/snapback] Yeah...OK...Check into that therapy thingy. Of course, you might have to remove the tinfoil hat first, or are you afraid that the stormtroopers of the Bush cabal are going to steal it from you?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Since it's not crap it's a moot question. 599370[/snapback] Okay...let's be nice then and call it "speculation". Regardless...prove it.
MichFan Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 The definition of liberal is "Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded." What an idealisitc definition. Ironic too, considering the Democrat party has become the party of bigotry.
X. Benedict Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 What an idealisitc definition. Ironic too, considering the Democrat party has become the party of bigotry. 599441[/snapback] So the democrats are no longer liberal?
Buford T. Justice Posted February 9, 2006 Author Posted February 9, 2006 Liberals tolerate all religions. The definition of liberal is "Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded." It's just when a religious group tries to legislate what they should or shouldn't do in their own private lives that it's a problem. 599369[/snapback] I think I just wet myself.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 So the democrats are no longer liberal? 599492[/snapback] You don't have to be right-wing to be intolerant. See: Josef Stalin.
Adam Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 The Democrats continue to think that funerals are platforms for scoring political points. The Minnesota funeral and Ron Reagan's little diatribe at the Gipper's funeral blew up in their face. I'm sure this one will too. 597879[/snapback] The Democrats? or the people who speak out of turn trying to represent them.
RkFast Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 "LIBERALS TOLERATE ALL RELIGIONS" I just had MY "water spitting out of nose" moment, thank you!
X. Benedict Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 You don't have to be right-wing to be intolerant. See: Josef Stalin. 599513[/snapback] Well, here's half the problem, classical definitions of liberal and conservative have broken down. Cold war liberalism was antithetical to Stalinism and Maoism - Bush's entire program in the Middle East seems to be prefaced on the fact that Liberal Democracy will spread there, Republicans today seemed to be all for liberalizing markets, (free markets, by the way, are probably the least conservative force on the planet, what could break down the family structure faster than full exposure to world wide competition? ). I find most of this liberal vs. conservative stuff in america today incoherent.
EC-Bills Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 So the democrats are no longer liberal? 599492[/snapback] Maybe they are just liberally bigots?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Well, here's half the problem, classical definitions of liberal and conservative have broken down. Cold war liberalism was antithetical to Stalinism and Maoism - Bush's entire program in the Middle East seems to be prefaced on the fact that Liberal Democracy will spread there, Republicans today seemed to be all for liberalizing markets, (free markets, by the way, are probably the least conservative force on the planet, what could break down the family structure faster than full exposure to world wide competition? ). I find most of this liberal vs. conservative stuff in america today incoherent. 599620[/snapback] Spoken like a friggin' liber-...er, conserv-...uh...what is this, exactly? Democonservitarianism?
RkFast Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Spoken like a friggin' liber-...er, conserv-...uh...what is this, exactly? Democonservitarianism? 599648[/snapback] George Bush is a true Conservative.
X. Benedict Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Spoken like a friggin' liber-...er, conserv-...uh...what is this, exactly? Democonservitarianism? 599648[/snapback] I am a proud Libertotalitarian.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 George Bush is a true Conservative. 599671[/snapback] Yeah. And Lyndon LaRouche is a true populist Democrat.
Recommended Posts