Orton's Arm Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 Gus Frerotte's QB rating for 2005 was 71.9. Holcomb's was 85.6. Holcomb knows Mike Mularkey's offense, and could make an immediate impact for the Dolphins. The Dolphins seem to have enough talent to be able to do something, except the QB position is holding them back. So would you trade them Holcomb--a guy who would help them win now--to get a 3rd round pick who might help us win later?
RuntheDamnBall Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 (edited) Gus Frerotte's QB rating for 2005 was 71.9. Holcomb's was 85.6. Holcomb knows Mike Mularkey's offense, and could make an immediate impact for the Dolphins. The Dolphins seem to have enough talent to be able to do something, except the QB position is holding them back. So would you trade them Holcomb--a guy who would help them win now--to get a 3rd round pick who might help us win later? 591171[/snapback] Sure. But why would Saban suddenly see the light now and trade a third to have Holcomb on board for one year when he could have signed him with no draft pick compensation last year? This scenario doesn't add up for Miami, IMO. But I'd love it if they'd like to be ripped off. Besideswhich, Mularkey has already seen firsthand how Sage Rosenfels can pick apart a (certain) defense. Perhaps he'll go with the younger hand. Or maybe they get Vince Young (shudder). Edited February 1, 2006 by RuntheDamnBall
stinky finger Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 Gus Frerotte's QB rating for 2005 was 71.9. Holcomb's was 85.6. Holcomb knows Mike Mularkey's offense, and could make an immediate impact for the Dolphins. The Dolphins seem to have enough talent to be able to do something, except the QB position is holding them back. So would you trade them Holcomb--a guy who would help them win now--to get a 3rd round pick who might help us win later? 591171[/snapback] In a heartbeat! I don't understand why Miami would do something like this, but to answer your question, yes, yes I would. Did I mention in a heartbeat?
tennesseeboy Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 We need a backup. Holcomb's okay. I can't see trading for a third and then drafting a qb to back up (leaving us with less of a team for next year, without any reliable backup) or pissing away a lot of cap dollars for a backup qb. For next year we aren't going to do any better than the status quo...jp to start kh backup.
OnTheRocks Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 i would trade holcomb to the fish for a 7th round pick,...so yeah...a 3rd rounder is a no brainer.
stuckincincy Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 I would...but MIA might be better served by seeing if the neglected Rosenfels can do the job. I like KH, but the dollars say that JP gets the starts for better or for worse.
The Dean Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 In a heartbeat. i don't see Miami making that trade. I love that Holcomb is here (i was very happy when TD signed him). But, for a thrid round pick, "c ya" (sorry Simon). We can pick up another "Holcomb" as a FA. That might come back to bite us in the ass, though, if we sign the wrong "other Holcomb". Kelly's demonstrated he can run the O when given the right game plan.
stinky finger Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 Or maybe they get Vince Young (shudder). 591178[/snapback] Aww jeez there, meathead.......here we go again.
Spun Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 I don't know if either team would be interested. Rosenfels may turn out to be pretty good. Miami seemed to turn the corner this year, especially with their defense. A tough defense makes it a little easier to be patient with a young qb's development. And Holcomb may be the best qb on the current Bills roster at least for the short term. And with that third round pick? Horrors! Trade Josh Reed to Miami for a third round pick.
Orton's Arm Posted February 1, 2006 Author Posted February 1, 2006 Sure. But why would Saban suddenly see the light now and trade a third to have Holcomb on board for one year when he could have signed him with no draft pick compensation last year? Three reasons: 1) Holcomb's passer rating in 2005 was substantially higher than his prior career average. 2) Frerotte may not have performed up to Saban's expectations. 3) The arrival of Mike Mularkey. I'm not saying the Dolphins will make us this offer, just that there's a chance they might.
OnTheRocks Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 3) The arrival of Mike Mularkey. I'm not saying the Dolphins will make us this offer, just that there's a chance they might. 591203[/snapback] oh i see where you are going. a lot of former head coaches do sign their former players to their new team. i will be interested to see if Mularkey has any interest in any Bills offensive players. my guess is no. but if he were to go after anyone, i could see him trying to get Holcomb.
RuntheDamnBall Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 oh i see where you are going. a lot of former head coaches do sign their former players to their new team. i will be interested to see if Mularkey has any interest in any Bills offensive players.my guess is no. but if he were to go after anyone, i could see him trying to get Holcomb. 591207[/snapback] Perhaps we could also see if Mularkey would be interested in those rock solid guards of ours. It all begins with the offensive line. We could send them a sixth and a seventh to draft their eventual replacements, just to be fair.
RuntheDamnBall Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 Aww jeez there, meathead.......here we go again. 591194[/snapback] I'm pretty firmly convinced that in the hands of someone like Mularkey, Vince Young would be a player we would NOT want to face twice a year.
stinky finger Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 I'm pretty firmly convinced that in the hands of someone like Mularkey, Vince Young would be a player we would NOT want to face twice a year. 591212[/snapback] I don't doubt that. I was leary of anyone mentioning VY to 1gap2gap.
The Dean Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 I'm pretty firmly convinced that in the hands of someone like Mularkey, Vince Young would be a player we would NOT want to face twice a year. 591212[/snapback] I agree that he could turn out to be really something. But, i doubt it's going to be this year. And I'd rather have Miami spend the #1 on him than the Bills. Of course, if he'd just go to the NFC west...that would be much better.
The Dean Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 I don't doubt that. I was leary of anyone mentioning VY to 1gap2gap. 591219[/snapback] Good point
RuntheDamnBall Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 I agree that he could turn out to be really something. But, i doubt it's going to be this year. And I'd rather have Miami spend the #1 on him than the Bills. Of course, if he'd just go to the NFC west...that would be much better. 591223[/snapback] True on all counts. Saints, help us out here.
RuntheDamnBall Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 Three reasons: 1) Holcomb's passer rating in 2005 was substantially higher than his prior career average. 2) Frerotte may not have performed up to Saban's expectations. 3) The arrival of Mike Mularkey. I'm not saying the Dolphins will make us this offer, just that there's a chance they might. 591203[/snapback] I just really doubt it. It's like trading in a '92 Chevy in for a '94, when you really want a Jaguar. Frerotte's is pretty much the same smart, efficient, low reward percentage game that Holcomb runs. Or at least it was before Frerotte lost his battle with a wall.
stuckincincy Posted February 1, 2006 Posted February 1, 2006 oh i see where you are going. a lot of former head coaches do sign their former players to their new team. 591207[/snapback] Good observation. It is a natural inclination. I don't recall the figures, but Cincy HC Lewis brought in something like a dozen ex-Skins and Ravens onto the team.
Recommended Posts