Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I also have to leave in about 30 minutes to take my step-son to a doctors appointment. 

 

Thank God it's raining here.  Otherwise the draft wouldn't start until tonight (9PM East Coast Time).

588649[/snapback]

 

It's started.

 

You can pick now.

  • Replies 315
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Good one  <_<

588676[/snapback]

 

And now we wait.....

 

BTW I have to go out for a little while. So if the other GM's get on and draft up to 7, i'll be on at 8 to make my selection for San Fran. Or should I just PM a list of who i'd select to you 2003?

Posted
And now we wait.....

 

BTW I have to go out for a little while. So if the other GM's get on and draft up to 7, i'll be on at 8 to make my selection for San Fran. Or should I just PM a list of who i'd select to you 2003?

588681[/snapback]

 

Just PM me your possible picks. Thanks.

Posted
That's what i'm saying!

 

I put Jerry Porter as part of my deal to Houston simply because it makes sense. He's unhappy in Oakland, Houston could use some more firepower, and I made him worth very little (the trade was the #1 pick for Oakland's #6, Oakland's 3rd, and Jerry Porter).

 

Not only would the LT to New Orleans for #1 NEVER happen because San Diego wouldn't be looking to deal him, but I don't think an RB (even of LT's calibur) is going to get you the #1 pick.

588599[/snapback]

 

This is the gayest trade ever. Why the hell would NO trade FOR LT and his 50 million contract, when they just signed mcallister to a 50+ million deal last offseason...

 

this is fuggin "Dawgged"... <_<

Posted
Please, answer one question: Why the F*&^ would S.D. trade up to take Bush?

588769[/snapback]

 

Because ultimately, it is very possible that Bush will be a better all-around RB than LT.

 

Sometime ya just gotta roll the dice.

Posted
This is the gayest trade ever. Why the hell would NO trade FOR LT and his 50 million contract, when they just signed mcallister to a 50+ million deal last offseason...

 

this is fuggin "Dawgged"... :D

588758[/snapback]

 

McAllister is way too injury prone. L.T. is way more durable.

 

And yes. McAllister is up for trade bait.

 

(And remember, this is a mock draft. As if any of this is really going to happen. It's just part of the process of actually making this fun!!!)

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...