Lofton80 Posted January 23, 2006 Posted January 23, 2006 Lets face it, Jauron was an inexpensive choice. He likely was willing to take the job by keeping the coaches currently on the payroll. Sherman may have wanted to bring in a lot of his guys like Bates. I read this morning that St. Louis had asked Bates to be DC for $1,000,000. I doubt RW was going to pay a DC that much when he paid Malarkey that much to be HC. As for power, Marv hired a guy who is no challenge to him. Sherman would have been a threat with GM experience. Sherman may had wanted a say in things after having Ted Thompson lose his starting Guards with no replacements. The decision was not about coaching. Cheap and compliant.
truth on hold Posted January 23, 2006 Posted January 23, 2006 Lets face it, Jauron was an inexpensive choice. He likely was willing to take the job by keeping the coaches currently on the payroll. Sherman may have wanted to bring in a lot of his guys like Bates. I read this morning that St. Louis had asked Bates to be DC for $1,000,000. I doubt RW was going to pay a DC that much when he paid Malarkey that much to be HC. As for power, Marv hired a guy who is no challenge to him. Sherman would have been a threat with GM experience. Sherman may had wanted a say in things after having Ted Thompson lose his starting Guards with no replacements. The decision was not about coaching. Cheap and compliant. 578233[/snapback] you got it, especially about control. wilson wanted to move on sherman, which tells me the money wasnt the main reason to pass on sherman, it was all about making little old comfortable
Lurker Posted January 23, 2006 Posted January 23, 2006 Lets face it, Jauron was an inexpensive choice. He likely was willing to take the job by keeping the coaches currently on the payroll. Sherman may have wanted to bring in a lot of his guys like Bates. I read this morning that St. Louis had asked Bates to be DC for $1,000,000. I doubt RW was going to pay a DC that much when he paid Malarkey that much to be HC. As for power, Marv hired a guy who is no challenge to him. Sherman would have been a threat with GM experience. Sherman may had wanted a say in things after having Ted Thompson lose his starting Guards with no replacements. The decision was not about coaching. Cheap and compliant. 578233[/snapback] Sounds logical to me. Good analysis.
bernie Posted January 23, 2006 Posted January 23, 2006 This sucks! Other 5 years of the Bills sucking I can't take it. Spend some money Ralph!!! Sherman would have = hope!
Recommended Posts