BravinSeattle Posted January 19, 2006 Author Posted January 19, 2006 so...sherman to be offered the job and lofton offered an interview to satisfy the NFL 573710[/snapback] And Cotrell doesn't get an interview?
BravinSeattle Posted January 19, 2006 Author Posted January 19, 2006 No, Johnny was just acting errily like these guys would 573721[/snapback] holy sh*t.....that's AWESOME.
thisiskeith12 Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 they have no source. if they had one, you think more people would know about them. they call it before anyone else and always get it wrong, nothing new. anyone in this case could have called this as soon as james lofton was reported to be interviewing with the Bills. ps - they did an excellent job breaking the news that mularkey was fired before donahoe was
eball Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Can't say that I really trust that source -- their link to the "Must Read Bills News and Notes" is of the Lawyer Milloy signing. Yes, the one 3 years ago. Stay tuned for more late breaking news from !@#$ dot com. Rumor has it that Marvin Lewis is in the lead, but a relatively unknown DC from Tennessee will be interviewing with Tom Donahoe this week for the vacant HC position.
CoachChuckDickerson Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Yeah. I'm sure the only the explanation is that I'm posting a broken link hoping that no one will ever click on it and people will just believe my posting. Makes TOTAL sense. 573694[/snapback] I think the problem is your thread title. Kinda sounds like you are stating it as fact when even the cheesey link states it is their "latest rumor".
SDS Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 This is nothing new. When we had the ultimate source of inside information posting here during the Johnson era - it was posted on TBD that Johnson was chosen over Flutie. Magically, it appeared over there 15 minutes later and then magically after that their time stamp was altered to be 8 minutes before our time stamp... (I believe I have screen shots stored in some archive somewhere if it is denied...) Keep in mind our timestamps are unix timestamps associated with exact time an entry is inserted into our database and at the time they did their's by looking at a clock. So, the beat goes on... glad they are reading.
GG Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 This is nothing new. When we had the ultimate source of inside information posting here during the Johnson era 573822[/snapback] I guess this confirms that Ralph does know about this Internet thingy.
SDS Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 I guess this confirms that Ralph does know about this Internet thingy. 573854[/snapback] smart ass... ok, maybe not the "ultimate" but then again I'm not sure Ralph would be that person either.
GG Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 smart ass... ok, maybe not the "ultimate" but then again I'm not sure Ralph would be that person either. 573862[/snapback] Must have been the long lost taxi driver.
Fan in Chicago Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 This is nothing new. When we had the ultimate source of inside information posting here during the Johnson era - 573822[/snapback] I forget who that was. Was it ICE ? Anyway, right now it looks like between you and SOPRANO, we have all the sources we need.
stuckincincy Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 This is nothing new. When we had the ultimate source of inside information posting here during the Johnson era - it was posted on TBD that Johnson was chosen over Flutie. Magically, it appeared over there 15 minutes later and then magically after that their time stamp was altered to be 8 minutes before our time stamp... (I believe I have screen shots stored in some archive somewhere if it is denied...) Keep in mind our timestamps are unix timestamps associated with exact time an entry is inserted into our database and at the time they did their's by looking at a clock. So, the beat goes on... glad they are reading. 573822[/snapback] See? The "party line" is alive and kicking!
SDS Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 I forget who that was. Was it ICE ?Anyway, right now it looks like between you and SOPRANO, we have all the sources we need. 573935[/snapback] Well, I wouldn't say that...
jester43 Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 WTF?? It keeps putting in @#$% characters where the web address should be???front page 573692[/snapback] wait a minute...what the $#!@^ is "www.!@#$.com?" when i enter it, i get this: "http:////"
2003Contenders Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Is this website reliable? 573989[/snapback] It's not that the site is unreliable -- it's that by their very nature they report information that come from OTHER sources already in print. In this case, they are quoting Leo's article from this morning, which was mostly speculation.
Recommended Posts