BravinSeattle Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Link to story Dear GOD I hope this is true. http://www.!@#$.com/modules.php?o...order=0&thold=0 Here's the link with no fancy stuff.
Mile High Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Link to story Dear GOD I hope this is true. 573688[/snapback] Link doesn't work Brav.
BillsGuyInMalta Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Link doesn't work Brav. 573689[/snapback] I doubt it was supposed to
BravinSeattle Posted January 19, 2006 Author Posted January 19, 2006 Link doesn't work Brav. 573689[/snapback] WTF?? It keeps putting in @#$% characters where the web address should be??? front page
BillsGuyInMalta Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Ahhhhh...now it makes sense. !@#$ is about as reliable as PFT.com
BravinSeattle Posted January 19, 2006 Author Posted January 19, 2006 I doubt it was supposed to 573690[/snapback] Yeah. I'm sure the only the explanation is that I'm posting a broken link hoping that no one will ever click on it and people will just believe my posting. Makes TOTAL sense.
Mile High Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Ok I understand now. I tried to post from that website to TBD about Mularkey getting fired a couple weeks ago and the same thing happend to me. Someone pi$$ed off someone along the line.
CosmicBills Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Isn't this almost verbatim what Sopranos reported earlier tonight? Could it be www.!@#$.com got this story from the TSW and not an official source?
BravinSeattle Posted January 19, 2006 Author Posted January 19, 2006 Isn't this almost verbatim what Sopranos reported earlier tonight? Could it be www.!@#$.com got this story from the TSW and not an official source? 573696[/snapback] If that site is getting their info from a post on this message board that is pretty much full of replies insulting the guy..... Man. If that's the case, they suck. Hope not.
BravinSeattle Posted January 19, 2006 Author Posted January 19, 2006 Ok I understand now. I tried to post from that website to TBD about Mularkey getting fired a couple weeks ago and the same thing happend to me. Someone pi$$ed off someone along the line. 573695[/snapback] I seem to remember something like a pissing contest. Over what, I have no clue.
CosmicBills Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 If that site is getting their info from a post on this message board that is pretty much full of replies insulting the guy..... Man. If that's the case, they suck. Hope not. 573700[/snapback] I dunno either, but reading back through Soprano's posts tonight it covers everything he said. Which means either they both have the same inside source or they just bit a post from TSW and posted it on their own site. We'll find out soon enough I suppose
boomerjamhead Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 If that site is getting their info from a post on this message board that is pretty much full of replies insulting the guy..... Man. If that's the case, they suck. Hope not. 573700[/snapback] I'm sure that's not the case. beebeeeye sucks for so many other reasons because of arrogant folks like Barilli and Sarafin.
Mile High Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 I dunno either, but reading back through Soprano's posts tonight it covers everything he said. Which means either they both have the same inside source or they just bit a post from TSW and posted it on their own site. We'll find out soon enough I suppose 573703[/snapback] I just did the same thing. Wierd, huh?
CosmicBills Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 I just did the same thing. Wierd, huh? 573705[/snapback] Very. Since I'm not familiar with that site, I lean towards theory they just lifted their info from Soprano's post. That doesn't mean either is wrong though...just means its still not any more official than when Soprano said it earlier tonight.
BravinSeattle Posted January 19, 2006 Author Posted January 19, 2006 Very. Since I'm not familiar with that site, I lean towards theory they just lifted their info from Soprano's post. That doesn't mean either is wrong though...just means its still not any more official than when Soprano said it earlier tonight. 573707[/snapback] or maybe someone from that site posted it here to validate their rumor -- which hopefully is true.
sweet baboo Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 so...sherman to be offered the job and lofton offered an interview to satisfy the NFL
boomerjamhead Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 so...sherman to be offered the job and lofton offered an interview to satisfy the NFL 573710[/snapback] Not only that, but Lofton gets much needed exposure for his next HC interview in 2013.
BillsGuyInMalta Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Yeah. I'm sure the only the explanation is that I'm posting a broken link hoping that no one will ever click on it and people will just believe my posting. Makes TOTAL sense. 573694[/snapback] My bad Brav, just in a day that was full of fake posts and misleading info, it turned me uber-skeptical. That and I've got this sinking feeling the Bills are going to "settle" on Dick Jauron.
Lori Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 Isn't this almost verbatim what Sopranos reported earlier tonight? Could it be www.!@#$.com got this story from the TSW and not an official source? 573696[/snapback] Wouldn't be the first time, nor the last.
BravinSeattle Posted January 19, 2006 Author Posted January 19, 2006 My bad Brav, just in a day that was full of fake posts and misleading info, it turned me uber-skeptical. That and I've got this sinking feeling the Bills are going to "settle" on Dick Jauron. 573713[/snapback] No harm, no foul. Saw it, thought I'd alert people to it. I'll be praying to the football God's tonight that its true.
Recommended Posts