daquixers_is_back Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Did he make a football move after he had the ball? 568450[/snapback] He made about 3 of them ... holy crapola Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puppet Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 So if he lies there on the ground with the ball it's an interception ... but if he tries to get up and do something with it then it's not? Does that make ANY sense? Total bull sh--! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Yeah, it's a rule called the "we've been pimping Peyton Manning for years, we've got to get him to the Super Bowl THIS YEAR" rule. 568454[/snapback] Then again I'll ask, why didn't they call false start on the Steelers on 4th and 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywood Donahoe Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Did he make a football move after he had the ball? Fell to the ground, landed hard on the ground, and started to get up. Three football moves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kgun5 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 So if he lies there on the ground with the ball it's an interception ... but if he tries to get up and do something with it then it's not? Does that make ANY sense? Total bull sh--! 568456[/snapback] Exactly...What "memo" is going to explain this joke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
syhuang Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Seriously - is there a rule we dont know? 568429[/snapback] The great Peyton Manning needs to have at least one superbowl ring, so he can be the greatest QB ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Yeah, it's a rule called the "we've been pimping Peyton Manning for years, we've got to get him to the Super Bowl THIS YEAR" rule. 568454[/snapback] Of Course the rule was voted on and changed this off season.....it use to read: "we've been pimping Tom Brady all year, we've got to get him to the Super Bowl THIS YEAR" rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 I'm hoping the Steelers just bleed out the rest of this clock...kick the Colts right in the face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp000085 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Then again I'll ask, why didn't they call false start on the Steelers on 4th and 1? 568458[/snapback] the refs are hungover... They are all employees of the Jim Kelly for NY Governor campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kgun5 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Then again I'll ask, why didn't they call false start on the Steelers on 4th and 1? 568458[/snapback] I'll answer that...THEY DIDN'T SEE IT! There's no excuse for not seeing that play as an INT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcjeff215 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 I'm hoping the Steelers just bleed out the rest of this clock...kick the Colts right in the face. 568464[/snapback] So much for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Exactly...What "memo" is going to explain this joke? 568461[/snapback] They'll dust off the "tuck rule" memo and edit in some of the memo from the Dallas-Sabres "no goal" game. The offieicating has been horrible...but, both ways, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Yeah, it's a rule called the "we've been pimping Peyton Manning for years, we've got to get him to the Super Bowl THIS YEAR" rule. 568454[/snapback] This from a Pats fan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puppet Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 If this were the Bills instead of the Steelers and that happened I would be out of my mind. As it is - I think it's a ridiculous call. Especially when they overruled the call on the field. Unreal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted January 15, 2006 Author Share Posted January 15, 2006 So if he lies there on the ground with the ball it's an interception ... but if he tries to get up and do something with it then it's not? Does that make ANY sense? Total bull sh--! 568456[/snapback] exactly......what a laugh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Then again I'll ask, why didn't they call false start on the Steelers on 4th and 1? 568458[/snapback] That is true ... The Colts did get screwed there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schulman16 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Its technically not a pick. It's a terrible rule interpreted correctly. Why you ask? Because in order to make a catch, you have to maintain possession to the ground. Polamalu was technically going "to the ground" since the ball came out when his knee was down--hence it was incomplete when the ball came out. Its like the tuck rule. If polamalu just stayed down it would have been fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marv Levy Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Bill's gonna crap cowher turds after this film review!! "AMAZING MISSED CALL BATMAN!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted January 15, 2006 Author Share Posted January 15, 2006 Its technically not a pick. It's a terrible rule interpreted correctly. Why you ask? Because in order to make a catch, you have to maintain possession to the ground. Polamalu was technically going "to the ground" since the ball came out when his knee was down--hence it was incomplete when the ball came out. Its like the tuck rule. If polamalu just stayed down it would have been fine. 568486[/snapback] Your explanation makes absolutely no sense..sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Time for Manning to screw up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts