Tcali Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 they should trade down and get 2 quality linemen.....they should nevere trade up and risk it on one O-lineman--too Mike Williamsish. Then hit FA as hard as possible. -2 lower r1st round linemen..a 2nd ..a 3rd and 2 good FAs will go a long way.
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 So if it's less risky for the Bill's to trade down, why would another team offer us anything good to move into our position in the draft?
Dr. Fong Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 So if it's less risky for the Bill's to trade down, why would another team offer us anything good to move into our position in the draft? 567934[/snapback] If they were looking for a player at a position that we don't need and they absolutely were in love with him. Such as RB or WR. I'm not advocating the trade down notion just offering a scenario where it could happen.
BB2004 Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 they should trade down and get 2 quality linemen.....they should nevere trade up and risk it on one O-lineman--too Mike Williamsish.Then hit FA as hard as possible. -2 lower r1st round linemen..a 2nd ..a 3rd and 2 good FAs will go a long way. 567849[/snapback] I would add Ferguson to your list. Also if the DT from Oregon shows something in the pre-draft workouts, I wouldn't pass on him either.
EndZoneCrew Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 Vernon Davis, TE, Maryland. 567982[/snapback] please...I am trying to eat here!
Tcali Posted January 15, 2006 Author Posted January 15, 2006 So if it's less risky for the Bill's to trade down, why would another team offer us anything good to move into our position in the draft? 567934[/snapback] because they may have a player they just foolishly want
Tcali Posted January 15, 2006 Author Posted January 15, 2006 I would add Ferguson to your list. Also if the DT from Oregon shows something in the pre-draft workouts, I wouldn't pass on him either. 568102[/snapback] ok--i agree
Recommended Posts