B-Dawg12 Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 I agree with previous posts saying we should bring it dan reeves.....why haslett???, has he ever won anything or carried any winning team for a sustained period??....Reeves brings instant credibility and the respect of the players, the look on mularkey's and even greg williams face tells the story just not the confidence needed for head coaching material.... Reeves instantly brings respect and better play calling and can work with MArv in finalizing this teams needs
daquixers_is_back Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 I agree ... I personally do like Dan Reeves.
Adam Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 NO WAY- NEVER EVER- I'd rather have Don Shula himself!
Bills4154 Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 Why Reeves, let's get a young guy, Mike Ditka.
Shamrock Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 Doesn't DR run a really complex offense with complicated play calling to boot? Would that be a good fit to a rookie or journeyman that we currently have in Buffalo? Not sure.
frogger Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 I love the idea of getting a coach like Reeves, and his offense isn't that hard, if Vick and the the rest of the falcons can pick it up, so can the Bills, however don't sell Haslett short, remember the state the saints were in prior to his getting there, and if you look at his record, 4 out of 6 years he ended the season at or above .500. I think peyton is the worse of the bunch we are looking at right now, remember Fassel demoted him wihile he was with the giants, that sucks
JAMIEBUF12 Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 i'd take dan reeves in a heartbeat and if not him dick vermeil 2nd
swede316 Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 My 1st choice would be Sherman, Dan Reeves...not sure. Haslett is a good choice and can see why. We must get someone with head coaching experience. ...No more "hot" coordinators.
Recommended Posts