cosjef Posted January 14, 2006 Posted January 14, 2006 Sure enough, we made it twice: One bad: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedi...es/index.6.html One good: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedi...es/index.6.html
mcjeff215 Posted January 14, 2006 Posted January 14, 2006 Sure enough, we made it twice: One bad: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedi...es/index.6.html One good: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedi...es/index.6.html 566354[/snapback] Good, in this case, puts us at #1. Ups and downs and ups and downs.
Recommended Posts