truth on hold Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Makes a great deal of sense and has a good chance of happening. Here's some of the reasons why: - not only do eagles not want to trade TO to a team within their division, that don't want to trade him within the NFC conference. this reduces the list to AFC teams-only; - eagles think Moulds will fit in well with their mid-passing range system, that emphasises yards-after-catch; - Owens and Moulds are the same age, both turning 33 this year; - Eagles like Moulds reputation for working with young receivers like Lee Evans; - Bills, with the 29th ranked offense, have everything to gain and nothing to lose signing Owens to an incentives-laden contract; - Bills feel they need a bigger receiver to round out their receiving corps which is made up mostly of receivers under 6 feet; - Bills are one of the few teams Owen's agent Drew Rosenhaus has a good relationship with, having made Willis McGahee (i.e. one of Rosenhaus's clients) a 1st-round pick when other teams had passed on him; - Rosenhaus recently asked permission from the Eagles to seek a trade for Owens. Eagles granted permission, demonstrating they are looking to get something for Owens.
Sound_n_Fury Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Makes a great deal of sense 562705[/snapback] No, it doesn't.
truth on hold Posted January 12, 2006 Author Posted January 12, 2006 yes it does. consider 2 more factors: - Bills have soured on Moulds; - Owens would be better off with a small-market team where the media is less intrusive and there are fewer distractions over all.
IndyJay1234 Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Makes a great deal of sense and has a good chance of happening. Here's some of the reasons why: - not only do eagles not want to trade TO to a team within their division, that don't want to trade him within the NFC conference. this reduces the list to AFC teams-only; - eagles think Moulds will fit in well with their mid-passing range system, that emphasises yards-after-catch; - Owens and Moulds are the same age, both turning 33 this year; - Eagles like Moulds reputation for working with young receivers like Lee Evans; - Bills, with the 29th ranked offense, have everything to gain and nothing to lose signing Owens to an incentives-laden contract; - Bills feel they need a bigger receiver to round out their receiving corps which is made up mostly of receivers under 6 feet; - Bills are one of the few teams Owen's agent Drew Rosenhaus has a good relationship with, having made Willis McGahee (i.e. one of Rosenhaus's clients) a 1st-round pick when other teams had passed on him; - Rosenhaus recently asked permission from the Eagles to seek a trade for Owens. Eagles granted permission, demonstrating they are looking to get something for Owens. 562705[/snapback] The Bills had a good relationship with Drew R??? Noooo.. TD had the relationship with Drew R... TO is due a 7 million dollar roster bonus. So when making a trade remember we have to shell out 7 million. After feeling he got hosed with the Philly deal no way he signs for an incentive deal. He wants money up front. This is also the man that nullified a trade with Baltimore... I dont think we wanted to play with Kyle Boller so why would he want to play with JP? Also Buffalo is not exactly the media market that TO wants to be in. Mr Me... wants to be in a NY or Miami market.. Come on. Can we stop the TO stuff...
eball Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Marv loves players like TO. 562711[/snapback] LOL
Thailog80 Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Marv just reached for his nitro pills. 562719[/snapback] Just when the roller coaster hits the end someone drags it to the apex again.
R. Rich Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Just when the roller coaster hits the end someone drags it to the apex again. 562721[/snapback] Reliable, ain't they?
truth on hold Posted January 12, 2006 Author Posted January 12, 2006 The Bills had a good relationship with Drew R??? Noooo.. TD had the relationship with Drew R... TO is due a 7 million dollar roster bonus. So when making a trade remember we have to shell out 7 million. After feeling he got hosed with the Philly deal no way he signs for an incentive deal. He wants money up front. This is also the man that nullified a trade with Baltimore... I dont think we wanted to play with Kyle Boller so why would he want to play with JP? Also Buffalo is not exactly the media market that TO wants to be in. Mr Me... wants to be in a NY or Miami market.. Come on. Can we stop the TO stuff... 562717[/snapback] you're talking like TO has options, he doesn't. he'll have to restructure his contract and he'll have to accept going to a small market.
30dive Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Welcome aboard! Boy oh boy you picked a fine topic to start with! So many of our "members" start off with Hi my name is____________, my sign is_______________, I like watching movies, walks in the woods and dogs.
The Jokeman Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 As one that can often look past a player's off the field problems for the sake of talent (ie I didn't think the Rams made a mistake drafting Lawrence Phillips), I wouldn't even trade a 7th Round pick for Owens. The reason being is his problem is he's chiefly concerned with himself and not the team which he brings and onto the field and into the locker room and impact the team's play and/or divide the locker room. Lest we not forget the last time we had someone like this on the team named Flutie and how well that turned out?
truth on hold Posted January 12, 2006 Author Posted January 12, 2006 Marv loves players like TO. 562711[/snapback] well he should, like it or not, when TO wants to be he's the best receiver in the league and the only one that can truly dominate a game. marv is a smart guy and can see value. why not take a shot at jump starting one the league's worst offenses?
Thailog80 Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Reliable, ain't they? 562723[/snapback] Like Haley's comet. Except they seem to come every 75 seconds.
R. Rich Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 well he should, like it or not, when TO wants to be he's the best receiver in the league and the only one that can truly dominate a game. marv is a smart guy and can see value. why not take a shot at jump starting one the league's worst offenses?562733[/snapback] The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind...
IndyJay1234 Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 you're talking like TO has options, he doesn't. he'll have to restructure his contract and he'll have to accept going to a small market. 562724[/snapback] No he wont.
Beerball Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Marv loves players like TO. 562711[/snapback] TO is a player who makes plays. Marv respects that. I like this deal, and would welcome TO to the Bills.
Fake-Fat Sunny Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 well he should, like it or not, when TO wants to be he's the best receiver in the league and the only one that can truly dominate a game. marv is a smart guy and can see value. why not take a shot at jump starting one the league's worst offenses? 562733[/snapback] I aggree totally with jdunc that embracing this type of move would be the totally logical thing for TO to do. However, the a question which Jdunc fails to address is WHEN HAS T.O. DONE THE LOGICAL THING FOR HIMSELF (much less the team) since he jumped ship and forced his move to Philly. The arguments he lays out about why this move makes football sense are totally legit. The question is whether one as a person has faith in TO that he now will fly right. Even then it raises another question which must be answered before any deal happens as to whether Marv and the "new" Billls are willing to invest in a belief in the "new" TO and invest in him despite the fact his past acts run totally counter to Marv's initial words that his Bills are going to be all about character. I believe in Jdunc's football analysis, but I have no faith that TO will act logically and no belief at all that the Bills and Marv will believe in a "new" TO.
Buftex Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 TO is a player who makes plays. Marv respects that. I like this deal, and would welcome TO to the Bills. 562745[/snapback] If you believe that, pick up Marv Levy's book...I was flipping through it on the hopper last night. In the last chapter, talking about resigning from the Bills, he goes through a litany of the things that made the Bills special, and the kind of players they were...Owens would not fit Levy's description, at all...in fact, ol' Marv expresses some disdain for players like Owens. If we can believe what he says...TO won't be putting on a Bills uniform any time soon...
Recommended Posts