VABills Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 Interesting piece from Clayton that Mularkey while he did take play calling away from Clements, did in fact turn them back over. WTF????? Clement departure a surprise: The firing of Bills offensive coordinator Tom Clements is a surprise. Mularkey took the play-calling ability away from Clements and started calling the plays himself in the middle of the season. Mularkey never said anything publicly, but Clements was upset about the move. Clements ended up calling plays in the final months of the season but his relationship with the head coach wasn't the same. Over the next week, there could be as many as four changes on the coaching staff, some that will affect the defense. http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?name=clayton_john
Sound_n_Fury Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 If this is true (never a given with Clayton), my guess is that TD forced MM to give the playcalling back to "his guy" Clements. Hence, the medling reference we heard from RW...
LabattBlue Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 Interesting piece from Clayton that Mularkey while he did take play calling away from Clements, did in fact turn them back over. WTF????? Clement departure a surprise: The firing of Bills offensive coordinator Tom Clements is a surprise. Mularkey took the play-calling ability away from Clements and started calling the plays himself in the middle of the season. Mularkey never said anything publicly, but Clements was upset about the move. Clements ended up calling plays in the final months of the season but his relationship with the head coach wasn't the same. Over the next week, there could be as many as four changes on the coaching staff, some that will affect the defense. http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?name=clayton_john 559954[/snapback] I actually have been wondering about this. I noticed TC with the play calling chart in sideline shots several times over the last few games. Very interesting.
Rubes Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 That explains all those damn passes to Shelton...
R. Rich Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 Serves them right for giving a corner the right to call plays.
drnykterstein Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 That explains all those damn passes to Shelton... 559993[/snapback] Along with plenty of other things. ... maybe, just maybe, there is a chance the Bills can turn thngs around with MM at the helm.
Sound_n_Fury Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 This article always intrigued me, and may have a lot to say about what went down the past year: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04053/276075.stm Mularkey, who became head coach of the Buffalo Bills last month, wanted to hire Whisenhunt as his offensive coordinator in Buffalo this year. But Bills president Tom Donahoe pressed him to hire Tom Clements instead and Bill Cowher promoted Whisenhunt after a cursory look at other candidates. "He's got a chance to do some things there," Mularkey said. "I think it's a great opportunity."
boomerjamhead Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 Serves them right for giving a corner the right to call plays. 559995[/snapback] He's the franchise corner though.
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 At the time I thought I recalled that the Steelers wouldn't give permission to interview Whisenhunt as they planned on making him the OC, which they did. It does indicate though that Pitt viewed Whisnehunt as being better than Clements though. This article always intrigued me, and may have a lot to say about what went down the past year: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04053/276075.stm Mularkey, who became head coach of the Buffalo Bills last month, wanted to hire Whisenhunt as his offensive coordinator in Buffalo this year. But Bills president Tom Donahoe pressed him to hire Tom Clements instead and Bill Cowher promoted Whisenhunt after a cursory look at other candidates. "He's got a chance to do some things there," Mularkey said. "I think it's a great opportunity." 559999[/snapback]
buffaloboyinATL Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 This article always intrigued me, and may have a lot to say about what went down the past year: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04053/276075.stm Mularkey, who became head coach of the Buffalo Bills last month, wanted to hire Whisenhunt as his offensive coordinator in Buffalo this year. But Bills president Tom Donahoe pressed him to hire Tom Clements instead and Bill Cowher promoted Whisenhunt after a cursory look at other candidates. "He's got a chance to do some things there," Mularkey said. "I think it's a great opportunity." 559999[/snapback] He sure called a hell of a gadget play yesterday when Randel El took a direct snap, ran across the field and threw it back to Rothlisburger who launched the ball down field for a TD. The entire defense bought it and were completely out of position. I loved it.
CosmicBills Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 He sure called a hell of a gadget play yesterday when Randel El took a direct snap, ran across the field and threw it back to Rothlisburger who launched the ball down field for a TD. The entire defense bought it and were completely out of position. I loved it. 560028[/snapback] That was ND's old play the "monkey pass" that Holtz ran on FSU a bunch of times in the 90s. Those Seminoles fell for it every time too.
dave mcbride Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 This article always intrigued me, and may have a lot to say about what went down the past year: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04053/276075.stm Mularkey, who became head coach of the Buffalo Bills last month, wanted to hire Whisenhunt as his offensive coordinator in Buffalo this year. But Bills president Tom Donahoe pressed him to hire Tom Clements instead and Bill Cowher promoted Whisenhunt after a cursory look at other candidates. "He's got a chance to do some things there," Mularkey said. "I think it's a great opportunity." 559999[/snapback] that's really interesting. i had no idea.
GG Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 that's really interesting. i had no idea. 560034[/snapback] This story is a bit dated, and Post Gazette is the only one that ran with it. We never knew if there was substance to it, or Steelers spinning it for the benefit of Whisenhunt's promotion.
dave mcbride Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 This story is a bit dated, and Post Gazette is the only one that ran with it. We never knew if there was substance to it, or Steelers spinning it for the benefit of Whisenhunt's promotion. 560074[/snapback] gotcha on the date. is the post gazette a lousy paper when it comes to football matters? i honestly don't have any idea.
R. Rich Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 is the post gazette a lousy paper when it comes to football matters? i honestly don't have any idea. 560080[/snapback] Not @ all. The Post-Gazette has very good coverage not only of the NFL, but also collegiate and high school football. They have a pretty good rep, from what my brother (a reporter w/ 16 years experience) tells me. He also says the Buffalo News has a pretty bad rep, sad to say.
todd Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 If this is true (never a given with Clayton), my guess is that TD forced MM to give the playcalling back to "his guy" Clements. Hence, the medling reference we heard from RW... 559969[/snapback] Clements was actually Mularkey's guy.
Sound_n_Fury Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 This story is a bit dated, and Post Gazette is the only one that ran with it. We never knew if there was substance to it, or Steelers spinning it for the benefit of Whisenhunt's promotion. 560074[/snapback] I know the article's dated. I just think it's interesting that Clements presumably wasn't MM's first choice for OC and that TD had his fingerprints all over his hire. I believe I read somewhere (Felser, maybe) that TD also tried to hire Clements during the GW era, but the Stillers wouldn't give permission. I've always had a high regard for Ed Bouchette's work and don't think he's be that likely to run with a spun story. It's also interesting that Whisenhunt will be intereviewed for the Houston HC openning after the playoffs.
Beerball Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 I actually have been wondering about this. I noticed TC with the play calling chart in sideline shots several times over the last few games. Very interesting. 559976[/snapback] I asked that question towards the end of the season. In every shot of MM I never saw a play chart, and wondered WTF was going on. On one hand I hope he was forced into giving the calls back to Clements because that absolves him of 'blame' in the horrible calls, on the other hand if he was forced he needs to grow a couple.
Buffalo_Stampede Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 Clements was actually Mularkey's guy. 560093[/snapback] Actually, Tom Donahoe wanted Gregg Williams to hire Tom Clements. So, if you look at it that way, it looks like DOnahoe has been looking to hire Clements for awhile, way before Mularkey.
dave mcbride Posted January 9, 2006 Posted January 9, 2006 Actually, Tom Donahoe wanted Gregg Williams to hire Tom Clements. So, if you look at it that way, it looks like DOnahoe has been looking to hire Clements for awhile, way before Mularkey. 560119[/snapback] just throwing this out there -- what do you think mularkey and donohoe's relationship was like by the end?
Recommended Posts