Dan III Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/bills/home.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/bills/home.htm COACHING: D - Another uninspiring day by Mike Mularkey and his staff. Failing to use McGahee near the goal line for a second consecutive week was puzzling. Couldn't find ways to call off the Raiders' blitz. Penalties and dropped passes compounded their problems. With bye week, it's back to drawing board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch19079 Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 COACHING: D - Another uninspiring day by Mike Mularkey and his staff. Failing to use McGahee near the goal line for a second consecutive week was puzzling. Couldn't find ways to call off the Raiders' blitz. Penalties and dropped passes compounded their problems. With bye week, it's back to drawing board. 39410[/snapback] last i looked, henry was our "power back", and McGahee was the fast, make a cut and a juke and hit the hole type runner. i think henry can move the pile more than McGahee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campy Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 COACHING: D - Another uninspiring day by Mike Mularkey and his staff. Failing to use McGahee near the goal line for a second consecutive week was puzzling. Couldn't find ways to call off the Raiders' blitz. Penalties and dropped passes compounded their problems. With bye week, it's back to drawing board. 39410[/snapback] Hate to sound like Greggy, but the failure in picking up the blitz and then dropping balls seems more like the players' lack of execution than Mularkey's fault. And claiming the play calling was uninspiring tells me the author didn't watch the game. Moulds at QB, the fake punt after the penalty, etc, seem pretty inspired to me. Again, the lack of execution (and a couple of dumb penalties and a bad call or two from the refs) billsfanone this team in week 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USMCBillsFan Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 Hate to sound like Greggy, but the failure in picking up the blitz and then dropping balls seems more like the players' lack of execution than Mularkey's fault. And claiming the play calling was uninspiring tells me the author didn't watch the game. Moulds at QB, the fake punt after the penalty, etc, seem pretty inspired to me. Again, the lack of execution (and a couple of dumb penalties and a bad call or two from the refs) billsfanone this team in week 2. 39508[/snapback] The "Moulds at QB" play was a joke not inspiring. Also the fake punt wasn't called from the sidelines. It was an "audible" type play when the defense didn't cover our outside guy. Morman "called" that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevbeau Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 Hate to sound like Greggy, but the failure in picking up the blitz and then dropping balls seems more like the players' lack of execution than Mularkey's fault. And claiming the play calling was uninspiring tells me the author didn't watch the game. Moulds at QB, the fake punt after the penalty, etc, seem pretty inspired to me. Again, the lack of execution (and a couple of dumb penalties and a bad call or two from the refs) billsfanone this team in week 2. 39508[/snapback] Might just be me, but it looked the fake punt was a heads up play by the special teams unit. You could see the FB (?shelton?) motioning to Kevin Thomas being wide open. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts