billsboys Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 NICE!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 NICE!!!! 550506[/snapback] AJ Hawk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 1 of these thing doesnt belong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAST MODE BABY! Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Personally, I think Crowell will replace Posey. I don't see Posey being retained. A.J. Hawk would be great if we didn't have to address the D and O-lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlamnSam Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Personally, I think Crowell will replace Posey. I don't see Posey being retained. A.J. Hawk would be great if we didn't have to address the D and O-lines. 550543[/snapback] I vote for AJ Hawk, man he was monster yesterday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Hawk. Crowell, IMHO, is a barely passable LB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sen. John Blutarsky Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Crowell is too small to play the strong side...I see Spikes as the one who will swap sides and play the strong side. Unless we go back to the 3-4 and slide Crowell or Spikes back inside along with Fletcher with Posey (or his replacement) as the rush-backer. In a 3-4 Denney and Kelsay could also be rush-backers with Tim Anderson sliding out to end with Adams or his replacement at Nose Guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seq004 Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Hell yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Crowell is too small to play the strong side...I see Spikes as the one who will swap sides and play the strong side. Unless we go back to the 3-4 and slide Crowell or Spikes back inside along with Fletcher with Posey (or his replacement) as the rush-backer. 550587[/snapback] Ditto...though I wouldn't phrase it with as much certainty myself. I think Crowell might be too small to play strong-side. However...how much worse than Posey could he actually be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatPatPatSack Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Ditto...though I wouldn't phrase it with as much certainty myself. I think Crowell might be too small to play strong-side. However...how much worse than Posey could he actually be? 550593[/snapback] Aren't we a bit ahead of ourselves? Who says Spikes is back as his old self. Other than him and his agent. I recall a domanint linebacker that we once had that couldn't work through injuries, Cowart, and let's see, how about Conlan? I'll bet neither was as severe as what Spikes is working through. I think putting Spikes in is 50/50 to play on opening day, much less to play at a high level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sen. John Blutarsky Posted January 3, 2006 Share Posted January 3, 2006 Aren't we a bit ahead of ourselves? Who says Spikes is back as his old self. Other than him and his agent. I recall a domanint linebacker that we once had that couldn't work through injuries, Cowart, and let's see, how about Conlan? I'll bet neither was as severe as what Spikes is working through. I think putting Spikes in is 50/50 to play on opening day, much less to play at a high level. 550644[/snapback] Right, hence Spikes on the strong side as opposed to the weak side where he'd have to show more range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts