Jump to content

They BETTER bring the Patriot act back


Adam

Recommended Posts

Well now you ruint it - the last thing I would ever do is parrot my husband, on ANYTHING. 

 

I've always thought the government was full of nincompoops and have never relied on them to be anything but wasteful, frivolous pompous asses.

 

That's why, when I was asked to consider a run for Congress, I said no.  I knew I'd have NO patience for that bull sh--.  I once belonged to an organization comprised 99% of white guys so I understand why it is that nothing gets done but pontification, self-aggrandizement and enrichment, along with a whole lot of empty promises.

546326[/snapback]

 

Gee, thanks for the pep talk, Deb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's why, when I was asked to consider a run for Congress, I said no.  I knew I'd have NO patience for that bull sh--.  I once belonged to an organization comprised 99% of white guys so I understand why it is that nothing gets done but pontification, self-aggrandizement and enrichment, along with a whole lot of empty promises.

546326[/snapback]

 

Now theres a progressive, tolerant, understanding and enlightened statement, if i EVER heard one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am cracking up - this is just what the nuns told us all about the Commies in the 1960s when we were little kids.  Yup, the Russians were going to push nails in our eyeballs and Chinese would either use water torture or bamboo slivers under our fingernails.

 

I recall my mom stockpiling non-perishable food in the basement as a hedge against The Bomb but never any hint at giving up on doing exactly as we pleased or going where we wanted to go.

 

But hey, those who want to let the government take care of all this since they know so much better, give up your freedoms.  If that is what makes you safe, then perhaps you should go to a country where there is no freedom, because those people must be really safe, eh?

 

:D

545213[/snapback]

 

Weak comparison. The communists didn’t blow up two buildings in NY, nor blow up a subway in London, trains in Spain or attempt to set off a dirty bomb in the US. I’d take the Cold War over the war on terrorism any day. Mutually ensured destruction was our greatest weapon during the Cold War. The patriot act and human intelligence are our best weapons against the war on terror. If we have to suspend some liberties during this war, so be it. It’s nothing new. During WWII the press was censored and our nation survived it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weak comparison.  The communists didn’t blow up two buildings in NY, nor blow up a subway in London, trains in Spain or attempt to set off a dirty bomb in the US.  I’d take the Cold War over the war on terrorism any day.  Mutually ensured destruction was our greatest weapon during the Cold War.  The patriot act and human intelligence are our best weapons against the war on terror.  If we have to suspend some liberties during this war, so be it. It’s nothing new.  During WWII the press was censored and our nation survived it.

550182[/snapback]

As has been mentioned many times, in many ways from all quarters of the political spectrum, this "war" is different from all others in that it may never end. There will never be a "Victory over Terrorism" day like there was a VE or a VJ day. Thus, we are not temporarily giving up our rights, we are doing it permanently.

 

Many of the historical actions you refer took place with oversight/knowledge of the other branches. Many were in full view of the public or even authorized specifically by Congress. What happened here is without precedent. He violated a law specifically drawn up to address this very situation. Worse, there was no need to disregard that law. All the security you are so willing to embrace at the cost of liberty is provided for under FISA. He can tap anyone, anywhere, for any reason for a whole year with extensions available. All he had to do was notify (notify, not ask permission) the FISA court and a few committe heads in congress.

 

FISA was drawn up to allow and legalize the limited suspension of constitutional rights in favor of security needs you say we need in this conflict. It was even amended by the Patriot Act to update it and make it that much more useful and adapted to the war on terrorism. Even so, this President disregarded it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been mentioned many times, in many ways from all quarters of the political spectrum, this "war" is different from all others in that it may never end.  There will never be a "Victory over Terrorism" day like there was a VE or a VJ day.  Thus, we are not temporarily giving up our rights, we are doing it permanently.

 

Many of the historical actions you refer took place with oversight/knowledge of the other branches.  Many were in full view of the public or even authorized specifically by Congress.  What happened here is without precedent.  He violated a law specifically drawn up to address this very situation.  Worse, there was no need to disregard that law.  All the security you are so willing to embrace at the cost of liberty is provided for under FISA.  He can tap anyone, anywhere, for any reason for a whole year with extensions available.  All he had to do was notify (notify, not ask permission) the FISA court and a few committe heads in congress.

 

FISA was drawn up to allow and legalize the limited suspension of constitutional rights in favor of security needs you say we need in this conflict.  It was even amended by the Patriot Act to update it and make it that much more useful and adapted to the war on terrorism.  Even so, this President disregarded it.

550251[/snapback]

It will end with the extermination of all the terrorists!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will end with the extermination of all the terrorists!

550302[/snapback]

... and how will we know that has occurred? Will they send us a note? At what point will we know there is not a single solitary person on the planet who is planning to strap a backpack bomb on and board a subway?

 

There will never be a "victory" moment. Liberty is easy to give away, much harder to retrieve once lost. Besides, if no one but the executive/king knows that he has stolen this or that liberty, how will we know to ask for it back?

 

Bush has made up his own rules and appointed himself to make sure he obeys himself. It is okay though, we can be sure he is not abusing the power to trample civil liberties because he has vigorously checked up on himself and it turns out he has done nothing wrong.

 

*whew* What a relief. For a minute there I thought democracy was in trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... and how will we know that has occurred?  Will they send us a note?  At what point will we know there is not a single solitary person on the planet who is planning to strap a backpack bomb on and board a subway?

 

There will never be a "victory" moment.  Liberty is easy to give away, much harder to retrieve once lost.  Besides, if no one but the executive/king knows that he has stolen this or that liberty, how will we know to ask for it back?

 

Bush has made up his own rules and appointed himself to make sure he obeys himself.  It is okay though, we can be sure he is not abusing the power to trample civil liberties because he has vigorously checked up on himself and it turns out he has done nothing wrong.

 

*whew*  What a relief.  For a minute there I thought democracy was in trouble.

550366[/snapback]

 

Simple. We'll "know" when Islamic radicals are wiped out.

 

 

Which conveniently neglects the fact that 100 years ago, terrorists weren't Islamic but anarchists. 100 years before that, they were the French. :D 100 years before that...? Hell, 20 years ago it was the friggin' Irish. At any rate, terrorism as a tactic just "is", and by that measure you can't "wipe out" terrorists.

 

You can, however, potentially "wipe out" Islamic radicalism...in the sense that you can change the conditions under which it thrives. But other terrorists will pop up in their place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple.  We'll "know" when Islamic radicals are wiped out.

Which conveniently neglects the fact that 100 years ago, terrorists weren't Islamic but anarchists.  100 years before that, they were the French.  B-)  100 years before that...?  Hell, 20 years ago it was the friggin' Irish.  At any rate, terrorism as a tactic just "is", and by that measure you can't "wipe out" terrorists.

 

You can, however, potentially "wipe out" Islamic radicalism...in the sense that you can change the conditions under which it thrives.  But other terrorists will pop up in their place.

550418[/snapback]

So ultimately, if we follow the logic of those who woud trade liberty for security in this particular conflict, we have cashed in our freedom in exchange for a perpetual game of "whack-a-mole"?

 

Maybe that is overstating it since they haven't yet infringed upon my freedoms that I am aware of so, since it is clearly not my nuts in the vice, I'll just resort to an applause getting, jingoistical patriotic rant about killing all those damn muslims and then go back to my TV and count the seconds to the next wet t-shirt moment on Survivor: Wet Place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So ultimately, if we follow the logic of those who woud trade liberty for security in this particular conflict, we have cashed in our freedom in exchange for a perpetual game of "whack-a-mole"?

 

Yep. That may be overstating it just a bit, but fundamentally: yep.

 

Maybe that is overstating it since they haven't yet infringed upon my freedoms that I am aware of so, since it is clearly not my nuts in the vice, I'll just resort to an applause getting, jingoistical patriotic rant about killing all those damn muslims and then go back to my TV and count the seconds to the next wet t-shirt moment on Survivor: Wet Place.

550906[/snapback]

 

I think I'll join y - oooh, look! A shiny object!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So ultimately, if we follow the logic of those who woud trade liberty for security in this particular conflict, we have cashed in our freedom in exchange for a perpetual game of "whack-a-mole"?

 

Maybe that is overstating it since they haven't yet infringed upon my freedoms that I am aware of so, since it is clearly not my nuts in the vice, I'll just resort to an applause getting, jingoistical patriotic rant about killing all those damn muslims and then go back to my TV and count the seconds to the next wet t-shirt moment on Survivor: Wet Place.

550906[/snapback]

Haven't infringed that you know of? If a tree falls in the forrest and doesn't make a sound, did it fall.

 

All this talk about infringing on civil liberties....its not about liberties at all....its just about a bunch of selfish spoiled brats who were brought up to think they are entitled to things. I love watching them break down when they don't get the things they are entitled to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't infringed that you know of? If a tree falls in the forrest and doesn't make a sound, did it fall.

 

All this talk about infringing on civil liberties....its not about liberties at all....its just about a bunch of selfish spoiled brats who were brought up to think they are entitled to things. I love watching them break down when they don't get the things they are entitled to.

550997[/snapback]

 

Yeah, it's about the things we're entitled to.

 

Specifically, it's about the civil liberties the Constitution says we are entitled to.

 

B-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't infringed that you know of? If a tree falls in the forrest and doesn't make a sound, did it fall.

 

All this talk about infringing on civil liberties....its not about liberties at all....its just about a bunch of selfish spoiled brats who were brought up to think they are entitled to things. I love watching them break down when they don't get the things they are entitled to.

550997[/snapback]

Since you don't believe in civil freedoms and liberties, why don't you move to a country that doesn't have them? Why are you proud to be an American, when it's those freedoms and liberties that MAKE our country? I'm serious, why do you love the country if you don't care about what it was founded on?

 

I don't see how anyone can condone some of the stuff that's gone on. For example, the case where everyone who went to Vegas for a period of time now has a file opened on them.

 

How can an article like this not be chilling to you?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0501366_pf.html

 

CW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's about the things we're entitled to.

 

Specifically, it's about the civil liberties the Constitution says we are entitled to. 

 

B-)

551482[/snapback]

Yep, at a time of war, people talking to the enemy shouldn't be monitored. Anyone talking to Al Queda should have ALL of their calls monitored from that point on.

 

Since you don't believe in civil freedoms and liberties, why don't you move to a country that doesn't have them? Why are you proud to be an American, when it's those freedoms and liberties that MAKE our country? I'm serious, why do you love the country if you don't care about what it was founded on?

 

Yep, I don't love the country. I'm glad we cleared that up. I don't want it to be overrun by people who side with the terrorists, and I want those people snuffed out as quickly as possible. THOSE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO DON'T LOVE THIS COUNTRY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...