sfladave Posted December 24, 2005 Posted December 24, 2005 Yep, went from top 5 to 9-10..hope it was worth it! 541754[/snapback] We were never in the top 5. Before todays game we were 8th or 9th. Give me a 10th over a 3-5 pick anyday.
sfladave Posted December 24, 2005 Posted December 24, 2005 But none of these things discount the two arguments I'm making here: 1) Picking higher is better than not, 541796[/snapback] Not always, and for the money you pay for a top 5 it is a big risk.
gobillsinytown Posted December 24, 2005 Posted December 24, 2005 I think top five is more of a risk because of the money involved, and because it seems that top five picks seem to hav a higher underachiever potential. But ultimately, it's more important what the team does with rounds 2 through 5 that make the difference, and I think if we're one of the first teams picking in those rounds, the better.
BEAST MODE BABY! Posted December 24, 2005 Posted December 24, 2005 We were never in the top 5. Before todays game we were 8th or 9th. Give me a 10th over a 3-5 pick anyday. 541886[/snapback] Actually, we were 7th according to CBS Sportsline.
(2).thumb.jpeg.6e78fe3142ec9e6bfedbf027610db26f.jpeg)
Recommended Posts