Jump to content

Bills-Bengals Game Thread

Frez

By Frez
in The Stadium Wall Archives

 Share

Recommended Posts

Buffan00 Veteran

Buffan00

Posted
Posted
Roscoe has been just fine and was never brought in to be expected to be any sort of "savior". I didn't like the choice at the time but he has played as well as could be expected or better.

541679[/snapback]

"Just fine" you gotta be kidding??? ................................ Right? :P

  • Replies 283
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Alaska Darin Hall of Famer

Alaska Darin

Posted
Posted
yeah yeah, our line has bad talent, but mcnally hasn't done jack and he deserves criticism like all of our crap coaches.

I disagree because I'm not in the meetings or at practice. McNally has proven himself in the NFL and I'm not going to throw him under the bus because our players don't preform (like Mike Martz did with Bobby April).

 

On the first play, both guys on the right side totally missed their blocks. One of them has over 10 years in the NFL and all he had to do was keep his feet and get his hands on a LBer. Instead, he completely whiffed and Willis got stuffed.

 

by the by, moulds scored on that last play (he was not down and the ball broke the plane) but useless retard mularky decided to hurry up and run a bad play instead of challanging.

541677[/snapback]

I don't agree that he scored. His knee was down before he stretched across but I'll agree that he was closer than the spot.

34-78-83 Veteran

34-78-83

Posted
Posted
"Just fine"  you gotta be kidding??? ................................  Right? :P

541682[/snapback]

 

nope. He is among the nfl leaders in punt returns and is learning quickly how to play in the slot at WR. He runs good routes and has shown good hands. He knows how to make people miss in space.

 

These are all facts.

 

Again, I don't like a slot WR with my 2nd round pick, but he certainly has shown that he can be valuable in this league.

Buffan00 Veteran

Buffan00

Posted
Posted
nope. He is among the nfl leaders in punt returns and is learning quickly how to play in the slot at WR. He runs good routes and has shown good hands. He knows how to make people miss in space.

 

These are all facts.

 

Again, I don't like a slot WR with my 2nd round pick, but he certainly has shown that he can be valuable in this league.

541687[/snapback]

Right, but he was billed as a "burner" who would be a CONSISTANT deep ball threat! And so far he hasnt showed sh-t! THAT is a fact! Jack! :P

Alaska Darin Hall of Famer

Alaska Darin

Posted
Posted
Right, but he was billed as a "burner" who would be a CONSISTANT deep ball threat! And so far he hasnt showed sh-t! THAT is a fact!  Jack! :P

541691[/snapback]

He just showed that he was fast enough to beat three guys with an angle to the sideline for a first down on third and long.

 

To date, the offense hasn't tried to use him to throw deep. Could be that we already have a significant deep threat in Evans, a rookie QB, another QB who isn't known for his long ball, an offensive line that doesn't hold up well for such plays, etc. I wouldn't blame Parrish at this point.

MadBuffaloDisease All Pro

MadBuffaloDisease

Posted
Posted

Moulds did nothing his 1st 2 years in the NFL and he was a late 1st rounder. Evans took half a season WITHOUT being injured, to break-out, and he was a mid-1st rounder. Parrish had the injury and was a mid-2nd rounder. You do the math.

Buffan00 Veteran

Buffan00

Posted
Posted
He just showed that he was fast enough to beat three guys with an angle to the sideline for a first down on third and long.

 

To date, the offense hasn't tried to use him to throw deep.  Could be that we already have a significant deep threat in Evans, a rookie QB, another QB who isn't known for his long ball, an offensive line that doesn't hold up well for such plays, etc.  I wouldn't blame Parrish at this point.

541695[/snapback]

Well, rookie WR's take time to develop anyway. All im saying is he needed to do more with all the hype surrounding him. Would have been nice if JP could get used to him!

34-78-83 Veteran

34-78-83

Posted
Posted
Right, but he was billed as a "burner" who would be a CONSISTANT deep ball threat! And so far he hasnt showed sh-t! THAT is a fact!  Jack! :P

541691[/snapback]

 

Nope. He was never billed as a burner. He was billed for his quickness laterally in open space.

Buffan00 Veteran

Buffan00

Posted
Posted
Nope. He was never billed as a burner. He was billed for his quickness laterally in open space.

541699[/snapback]

OK.. :P Whats the difference..he was billed as being FAST OK?? :)

sfladave Veteran

sfladave

Posted
Posted
Right, but he was billed as a "burner" who would be a CONSISTANT deep ball threat! And so far he hasnt showed sh-t! THAT is a fact!  Jack! :P

541691[/snapback]

He hasn't been put into a position to be a deep threat.

 

Since his return Parrish has been used primarily on short pass routes. Add to that hte fact that he is spliting time with Reed as the #3 receiver and I'll bet that he has only played in about 15% of our offensive plays.

 

Parrish is an excellent addition to this team. Will he ever be a #1 reciver? I doubt it but he is a threat as a receiver and a returner.

Buffan00 Veteran

Buffan00

Posted
Posted
So are you contending he's not?  Or that the BILLS haven't figured out how to utilize it?

541704[/snapback]

Havent figured out how to utilize him..despite how this sounds I am a fan of him, just want to see more of him! Kind of like Lionell Gates!

34-78-83 Veteran

34-78-83

Posted
Posted
OK.. :P  Whats the difference..he was billed as being FAST OK?? :)

541702[/snapback]

 

If you don't understand the difference between quick/agile and fast, maybe you shouldn't be commenting with such conviction on the subject. There's plenty to be upset about with this team without manufacturing new things.

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...