Mikeleelop Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 I can not understand this decision? Losman needs experience and this is a real game. The season is over, why is the young guy not playing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 I can not understand this decision? Losman needs experience and this is a real game. The season is over, why is the young guy not playing? 540297[/snapback] BECAUSE HE'S INJURED! Read half the other JP threads on here. Sorry, the conspiracy theorists think that MM is under the impression that starting KH will save his job. Newsflash - MM will either be here or he won't, and it won't have anything to do with who starts the next two games! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frez Posted December 22, 2005 Author Share Posted December 22, 2005 BECAUSE HE'S INJURED! Read half the other JP threads on here. Sorry, the conspiracy theorists think that MM is under the impression that starting KH will save his job. Newsflash - MM will either be here or he won't, and it won't have anything to do with who starts the next two games! 540316[/snapback] And you seriously think these two games left on this years schedule mean nothing to Mike Mularkey or Ralph Wilson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seq004 Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 It's a dumb, stupid move which is the cornerstone of this coaching staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2003Contenders Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 The only thing I will say is that the last time JP came off the bench in a game, he led us to victory against the Chiefs. Maybe MM is planning on starting Kelly, but will insert JP once we inevitably see that we are losing? Remember, even before Kelly got knocked out of that game, we heard that MM was planning on using both QBs. Just a thought. And, even though I advocate going with one QB and sticking with him, there is no denying that teams defend these 2 QBs differently. Do you think Denver would have only rushed 2 or 3 defenders on most passing downs against JP, as they did against Kelly last week? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clockwork Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 I'd like to see JP. He hasn't sold me yet. I am still way uncomfortable with just handing the franchise to him. I want to see what he can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 Why isn't JP starting this week? Must be Mike Mularkey feels Kelly Holcomb gives him the best shot to save his job uh? 539814[/snapback] Mularkey gets paid whether he has a job or not- I think he's doing what is in the kid's best interest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 Mularkey gets paid whether he has a job or not- I think he's doing what is in the kid's best interest 540776[/snapback] EXCELLENT point -- coach contracts are guaranteed in the NFL. Further proof that he's probably not starting KH to "save his job," like some posters here seem to think. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(2).thumb.jpeg.6e78fe3142ec9e6bfedbf027610db26f.jpeg)
Recommended Posts