dave mcbride Posted December 14, 2005 Share Posted December 14, 2005 then it is perfectly acceptable to discuss the bad along with the idealized fantasies. 532341[/snapback] shouldn't it be "the bad along with the good"? or wasn't there any good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Senator Posted December 14, 2005 Share Posted December 14, 2005 ...and since some fans keep dredging his name up (while clearly having a vision of his time spent in Buffalo that never really existed)... I'm unclear - time never really existed, or Buffalo never really existed? Or Marv's time in Buffalo never really existed, i.e., he was never here? 'Cause if some fans' vision never really existed, than what's all the fuss? I mean, what's there to criticize, if it never existed? I don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BackInDaDay Posted December 15, 2005 Share Posted December 15, 2005 I'm unclear - time never really existed, or Buffalo never really existed? Or Marv's time in Buffalo never really existed, i.e., he was never here? 532480[/snapback] Who's this... Monty Python? That's funny stuff! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts