stevestojan Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Seven out of every one hundred people approve of what he is doing to this team? What a shame lobotomies are no longer common practice.
Rico Posted December 13, 2005 Author Posted December 13, 2005 And I was thinking it's still too high. 530476[/snapback] Well, maybe some people in here haven't voted yet.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Coincidentally, roughly seven out of every hundred people have affective or associative mental disorders as well...
Chilly Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Coincidentally, roughly seven out of every hundred people have affective or associative mental disorders as well... 530484[/snapback]
Fan in Chicago Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Coincidentally, roughly seven out of every hundred people have affective or associative mental disorders as well... 530484[/snapback]
AJ1 Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 ESPN That's pretty damn low. 530474[/snapback] Did you notice the only 2 lower got 0 % because they got no votes. 7% is low but he and staff deserve about .7% AT BEST.
Ramius Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Seven out of every one hundred people approve of what he is doing to this team? What a shame lobotomies are no longer common practice. 530479[/snapback] Lets do the math. there have been about 28000 votes this season for the Bills, equalling about 2000 per week. So out of the 2000 this week, that means there were roughly 160 approval votes for mularkey. Now how many people work at OBD and how big is mularkey's family? that may explain the 8%
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Lets do the math. there have been about 28000 votes this season for the Bills, equalling about 2000 per week. So out of the 2000 this week, that means there were roughly 160 approval votes for mularkey. Now how many people work at OBD and how big is mularkey's family? that may explain the 8% 530504[/snapback] I highly doubt Mularkey has that much support on OBD. I would not be surprised, however, if Donahoe had sent around a memo ordering everyone to visit that poll and vote in Mularkey's favor...if he can spare the time away from directing security to confiscate signs...
Kultarr Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Eh. He's a nice guy. Why not toss him a meaningless internet poll bone?
Steven in MD Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Did you notice the only 2 lower got 0 % because they got no votes. 7% is low but he and staff deserve about .7% AT BEST. 530498[/snapback] He is the lowest approval rating...Martz is inactive and Marucci is fired....
KD in CA Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 And I was thinking it's still too high. 530476[/snapback] The Pats, Jets and Felons fans all approve of the job he's doing.
krazykat Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 ESPN That's pretty damn low. 530474[/snapback] I didn't know he had such a big family.
nick in* england Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 I highly doubt Mularkey has that much support on OBD. I would not be surprised, however, if Donahoe had sent around a memo ordering everyone to visit that poll and vote in Mularkey's favor...if he can spare the time away from directing security to confiscate signs... 530516[/snapback] I disagree - I think OBD are behind him 100% and do not question him. This is right and how it should be. Its certainly how I want my organisation to be. On the T directive.... maybe....
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 I disagree - I think OBD are behind him 100% and do not question him. This is right and how it should be. Its certainly how I want my organisation to be. 532027[/snapback] In theory, that's how it should work. In practice, I've never seen an organization that works that way.
Johnny Coli Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 In theory, that's how it should work. In practice, I've never seen an organization that works that way. 532144[/snapback] What about the Moonies?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 What about the Moonies? 532153[/snapback] Don't kid yourself. They're not that organized.
stevestojan Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Coincidentally, roughly seven out of every hundred people have affective or associative mental disorders as well... 530484[/snapback] Stealing my jokes? http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showt...144&hl=approval
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 Stealing my jokes? http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showt...144&hl=approval 532597[/snapback] No, actually...I'd never seen that post before. I just had cause to be reading up on the literature on bipolar disorder recently, and the numbers stuck in my head.
Recommended Posts