OnTheRocks Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 "[Democrats] are the same people who rediscover poverty every election and promise to cure it. They've cured it so often that they've now made a profession of it. They thrive on failures, on righting wrongs, aiding victims, and so forth. It must be understood that success in those tasks would put them out of business. No matter how many programs are set up and operating, their proponents never claim success for them. To do so would be to say the problems have been solved, meaning the programs are no longer needed. And the programs, not the problems, are their very reason for being." —Ronald Reagan
stuckincincy Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Now THAT's funny. You guys kill me! 529855[/snapback] Do you have a caliber perference?
erynthered Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Do you have a caliber perference? 529928[/snapback] Bastard, all over my monitor. Too funny
Simon Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 I wish Ronald Reagan was smart enough to appreciate Ronald Reagan when he was in office.
RuntheDamnBall Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 "[Democrats] are the same people who rediscover poverty every election and promise to cure it. They've cured it so often that they've now made a profession of it. They thrive on failures, on righting wrongs, aiding victims, and so forth. It must be understood that success in those tasks would put them out of business. No matter how many programs are set up and operating, their proponents never claim success for them. To do so would be to say the problems have been solved, meaning the programs are no longer needed. And the programs, not the problems, are their very reason for being." —Ronald Reagan 529801[/snapback] Right, because there were never any poor people before "Democratic programs." And Republicans never EVER install feel-good sounding social programs like faith-based initiatives or No Child Left Behind. Soldier on like your side is less of a problem, though, if it makes you feel better. Programs without any accountability are a problem, but to say that they never help anyone is bollocks. I wonder what Reagan the FDR fan would have thought of Reagan the President...
tennesseeboy Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Right, because there were never any poor people before "Democratic programs." And Republicans never EVER install feel-good sounding social programs like faith-based initiatives or No Child Left Behind. Soldier on like your side is less of a problem, though, if it makes you feel better. Programs without any accountability are a problem, but to say that they never help anyone is bollocks. I wonder what Reagan the FDR fan would have thought of Reagan the President... 531712[/snapback] That's not fair. Republicans have established two of the largest feel good spending programs in history in the last few years. The Homeland Security pork barrel polka, the War in Iraq bash, and the New Orleans Hearty Party. However, none of the feel good went to poor people. I would mention a word that begins with H here, but certain folks will get their panties in a wad.
tennesseeboy Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 That's not fair. Republicans have established two of the largest feel good spending programs in history in the last few years. The Homeland Security pork barrel polka, the War in Iraq bash, and the New Orleans Hearty Party. However, none of the feel good went to poor people. I would mention a word that begins with H here, but certain folks will get their panties in a wad. 531820[/snapback] Actually that's three programs...I guess the repeal of the estate tax will be the fourth.
KRC Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Actually that's three programs...I guess the repeal of the estate tax will be the fourth. 531821[/snapback] How dare those evil Republicans being against taxing the sh-- out of people for dying. If it breathes...tax it. If it doesn't breathe...tax it for not breathing.
VABills Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Actually that's three programs...I guess the repeal of the estate tax will be the fourth. 531821[/snapback] Are you responding to yourself? CTM, can you help out here, I believe someone here has the same affliction as you?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Are you responding to yourself? CTM, can you help out here, I believe someone here has the same affliction as you? 532109[/snapback] What, he's harrassed by know-it-all midgets with no math or spelling skills too?
VABills Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 What, he's harrassed by know-it-all midgets with no math or spelling skills too? 532128[/snapback] Sorry, I wouldn't waste my time harrassing you. I have females that get that pleasure. You're for amateur time.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Sorry, I wouldn't waste my time harrassing you. I have females that get that pleasure. You're for amateur time. 532134[/snapback] But it's fascinating that you read "know-it-all midgets with no math or spelling skills" and automatically think of yourself.
VABills Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 But it's fascinating that you read "know-it-all midgets with no math or spelling skills" and automatically think of yourself. 532139[/snapback] So you're harrassing me then. BTW, good setup.
blzrul Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 That's not fair. Republicans have established two of the largest feel good spending programs in history in the last few years. The Homeland Security pork barrel polka, the War in Iraq bash, and the New Orleans Hearty Party. However, none of the feel good went to poor people. I would mention a word that begins with H here, but certain folks will get their panties in a wad. 531820[/snapback] Don't forget Tax Cuts For The Rich.
tennesseeboy Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Are you responding to yourself? CTM, can you help out here, I believe someone here has the same affliction as you? 532109[/snapback] Nope...I was correcting myself. Of course you know it all republican "thinkers" never get into situations where you would consider that Kind of explains the Iraq death toll.
drnykterstein Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Ronald was the last good president we had. Definately all of the Bushes and Clintons and such have not been worthy successors of him. If it were upto me we'd never had a person associated with a Clinton or a Bush anywhere near any public office ever again.
KD in CA Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Don't forget Tax Cuts For The Rich. 532147[/snapback] You mean tax cuts for people who actually pay taxes? Go figure!
tennesseeboy Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 You mean tax cuts for people who actually pay taxes? Go figure! 532299[/snapback] Which do you mean..people who actually pay taxes...or the rich???
KD in CA Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Which do you mean..people who actually pay taxes...or the rich??? 532305[/snapback] Is there any difference anymore? The so-called "rich" pay virtually all the federal taxes anyway, so I'm not sure who else the tax cuts should be going to.
Recommended Posts