jms62 Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 God knows McGhaee doesn't want to be here.... Bills did pretty good with the last USC back they drafted in the first round.
Thailog80 Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 God knows McGhaee doesn't want to be here.... Bills did pretty good with the last USC back they drafted in the first round. 528065[/snapback] Why would WM want to be here? Bush isn't going to be a Bill. No way.
Bear Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 And San Fran. I think it's very possible we get a top 5 pick, but not 1st.
Pete Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 He will look good in Buffalo? No sh--! When he comes to town as a Houston Texan he is gonna run all over us. Hell Mike Cloud runs all over us. Sage Rosenfals looks like Johny Unitas against us.
Kultarr Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 The only way the Bills get Bush is to trade-up, which will be very costly. So, even as bad as the Bills have become, they haven't even managed to be bad enough.
Fan in San Diego Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 We need OL first ! Not another WR. What good are WR's if JP doesn't have any protection to throw to them.
R. Rich Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 We need OL first ! Not another WR. What good are WR's if JP doesn't have any protection to throw to them. 528107[/snapback] Well.....see........if you get one that's really really fast, he can get open before the QB takes the sack, and then you can move the chains and score points. Problem solved.
Fan in San Diego Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 Well.....see........if you get one that's really really fast, he can get open before the QB takes the sack, and then you can move the chains and score points. Problem solved. 528111[/snapback] They dont make them that fast !
R. Rich Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 They dont make them that fast ! 528121[/snapback] Sure they do: @ the U!!!
BEAST MODE BABY! Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 Well.....see........if you get one that's really really fast, he can get open before the QB takes the sack, and then you can move the chains and score points. Problem solved. 528111[/snapback] Take a look at the detoit Lions. 'Nuff said.
R. Rich Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 Take a look at the detoit Lions. 'Nuff said. 528143[/snapback] Do they have any diminuative receivers w/ blazing speed?
BillsFanForever19 Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 I hate to admit it, but I agree. There's no way we'll get him without trading up. But the way I see it, we already have: 1.) 2.) 3.) 3.) for Henry 3.) Supplemental for Pat Williams 4.) 4.) Supp. for Jonas Jennings 5.) 6.) 7.) If Denver can get three 3rd's in 2005 for the crap they lost in FA, we should AT LEAST get a 3rd and a 4th for Jonas and Pat. If we franchise and trade Nate like everyone thinks we will, we should get another 2nd. And if we were to pick Bush, we obviously could trade away McGahee for another 1st. With the amount of money we reportedly have next year and the amount of picks we have, it's definitely do-able.
Bear Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 With the amount of money we reportedly have next year and the amount of picks we have, it's definitely do-able. 528185[/snapback] Without arguing the possibilities of that scenerio: We could also keep McGahee and use our 8 picks in the first 4 rounds to shore up the rest of the team.
BillsFanForever19 Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 Without arguing the possibilities of that scenerio: We could also keep McGahee and use our 8 picks in the first 4 rounds to shore up the rest of the team. 528207[/snapback] Agreed. Maybe i'm just high off of "blowout residue" and thinking a brand new, shiny RB who can get at least a yard a run sounds good. But honestly, I think we will have 8 picks in the first 4 rounds. We already have 5 and since we really didn't get anyone to replace Pat and Jonas, we should get a 3rd and a 4th supplementally (sp?). And Clements should be "Peerless'd".
Bear Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 The extra picks are iffy. It really makes no sense how the NFL decides who gets what. The fact that Jonas and Pat have had very minimal impact for their teams, and that we are talking about Buffalo here, leads to think we might get a pick at the end of the 4th round at best. As far as Nate goes...I just dont know. Peerless was coming off the best season of his career. Clements is arguably coming off his worst (including his rookie year). Will a team give up a high pick for him knowing that they will either be forced to pay him franchise money or renegotiate for league high money? I don't think I would.
SACTOBILLSFAN Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 We need OL first ! Not another WR. What good are WR's if JP doesn't have any protection to throw to them. 528107[/snapback] Reggie is a running back.
Mark Vader Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 The Reggie Bush Bowl will be decided on January 1st: San Francisco Vs. Houston.
Pete Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 Reggie is a running back. 528284[/snapback] how does a football fan not know who Reggie Bush is?
Recommended Posts