Cobra Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Thank you for not letting the team down. Someone had to bring Moulds back to reality, and Ralph made the right call. Moulds isn't ther player he once was, and his childish behavior is really getting old. Moulds needs to accept his limited role and realize Evans is now the man. Ralph - thanks again!
Dawgg Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 You're 12 years old, right? Thank you for not letting the team down. Someone had to bring Moulds back to reality, and Ralph made the right call. Moulds isn't ther player he once was, and his childish behavior is really getting old. Moulds needs to accept his limited role and realize Evans is now the man. Ralph - thanks again! 525956[/snapback]
Steven in MD Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Thank you for not letting the team down. Someone had to bring Moulds back to reality, and Ralph made the right call. Moulds isn't ther player he once was, and his childish behavior is really getting old. Moulds needs to accept his limited role and realize Evans is now the man. Ralph - thanks again! 525956[/snapback] If you think Moulds is wrong here, you need to learn about respect. Moulds was disrespected. Of course, I have my conspiracy theory since he is the last of the pre-TD guys, so it was an effort to stamp him out of the organization. Just my conspiracy.
KD in CA Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 If you think Moulds is wrong here, you need to learn about respect. Moulds was disrespected. Of course, I have my conspiracy theory since he is the last of the pre-TD guys, so it was an effort to stamp him out of the organization. Just my conspiracy. 526045[/snapback] Does anyone even know what Moulds did yet?? All these new threads are hysterical.
Phlegm Alley Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 If any good comes out of this at all, if anything, it will give us a good chance to see what our passing game/WR corps is going to be like sans Moulds. You might see them lay an egg, or maybe, just maybe, some one like Sam Aiken will step up and Moulds departure won't impede his progress.
buffalo mike2 Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 If any good comes out of this at all, if anything, it will give us a good chance to see what our passing game/WR corps is going to be like sans Moulds. You might see them lay an egg, or maybe, just maybe, some one like Sam Aiken will step up and Moulds departure won't impede his progress. 526055[/snapback] See the second half of last Sunday's game- without Moulds in the line-up drawing coverage on teams he has burnt in the past.
Wraith Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 OR, you could look at the first quarter, when he also wasn't on the field, and the passing game looked the best it had all year. Drawing credible conclusions from last weeks game is difficult at best.
Peter Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 See the second half of last Sunday's game- without Moulds in the line-up drawing coverage on teams he has burnt in the past. 526108[/snapback] Great observation.
SilverNRed Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 If you think Moulds is wrong here, you need to learn about respect. Moulds was disrespected. Of course, I have my conspiracy theory since he is the last of the pre-TD guys, so it was an effort to stamp him out of the organization. Just my conspiracy. 526045[/snapback] How do you know any of that???
MikeSpeed Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 What about the other games in which he did play in the second half, and they went no where. This team just does not perform in the second half, with or without EM. So using the Miami game to gauge the other receivers is moot.
Steven in MD Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Does anyone even know what Moulds did yet?? All these new threads are hysterical. 526054[/snapback] Does it matter what Moulds did? We will never know the truth of what happened, just like we do not know the truth about what happened with Rueben. What we know is that TD and company allow their life long Bills players to blow in the wind. This should have been dealt with INTERNALLY, and not in the press.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Does anyone even know what Moulds did yet?? All these new threads are hysterical. 526054[/snapback] I believe it was "performing an unnatural act on the field".
Steven in MD Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 How do you know any of that??? 526142[/snapback] The disrespect what to allow this to play out in the media and not within the organization. EM is not TO or Randy Moss. He is a player who played his entire career in Buffalo, many knowing his team had no chance to win. But he stuck it out, and the organization just aired their dirty laundry in the media.
thisiskeith12 Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Where were all these misinformed people days ago?
Bill from NYC Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 The disrespect what to allow this to play out in the media and not within the organization. EM is not TO or Randy Moss. He is a player who played his entire career in Buffalo, many knowing his team had no chance to win. But he stuck it out, and the organization just aired their dirty laundry in the media. 526374[/snapback] RW via Bills fans made Moulds a very rich man. Cry a river for him as you see fit. I for one think that he should do as he is told by his coaches, during a f#$%@# football game. If nothing else, he owes this much to Bills Fans. The situation seems to have worked out about as well as possible.
Kelly the Dog Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 The disrespect what to allow this to play out in the media and not within the organization. EM is not TO or Randy Moss. He is a player who played his entire career in Buffalo, many knowing his team had no chance to win. But he stuck it out, and the organization just aired their dirty laundry in the media. 526374[/snapback] Seriously, do you think that Mularkey just suspended Moulds for no reason? Do you think they could suspend Moulds and not have him practice and play and then the media would just ignore the story and not demand any explanation? You may be crazier than I feared.
thisiskeith12 Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 You realize you are talking to the same Mularkey who lied about this ordeal and makes the poorest play calling decisions on the season? Please remember that Mularkey didn't suspend him. Wilson did.
Steven in MD Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Seriously, do you think that Mularkey just suspended Moulds for no reason? Do you think they could suspend Moulds and not have him practice and play and then the media would just ignore the story and not demand any explanation? You may be crazier than I feared. 526396[/snapback] NO...The media reported 2 days before Moulds was suspended that he was going to be suspended. How does that happen?
Kelly the Dog Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 NO...The media reported 2 days before Moulds was suspended that he was going to be suspended. How does that happen? 526419[/snapback] Ummmm... because Moulds told a reporter he wasn't at practice because he was suspended? Because every reporter following the team was asking where is Eric Moulds? Because another player told a reporter after talking to Moulds that Moulds was going to be suspended? Mularkey was the only one in fact who DID tell a reporter that I, Mularkey, never said he was suspended. Because he didn't. And it hadn't been decided for certain yet. And even if it was, Mularkey was not going to announce it to the press until everyone was informed and understood it within the organization.
Recommended Posts