Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 529578[/snapback] I don't think I deserved that. But seriously...just because some people are over-sensitive and can't have kids within ten yards of them, it doesn't therefore follow that kids should be able to run all over the place like little hellions. In general, reasonable people are going to keep reasonable control of their kids (i.e. keep them in their seats, keep them from shouting at the top of their lungs), and reasonable people are going to give kids leeway within those boundaries to be kids. What I'm specifically thinking of, through this whole thread, is the idiots who let their children run around like amphetamine-soaked demons being physically disruptive, and laugh it off with "Kids will be kids". There is a happy medium between "Children should be seen and not heard", and "Children should be seen and heard by everyone in the building."
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 I don't think I deserved that. But seriously...just because some people are over-sensitive and can't have kids within ten yards of them, it doesn't therefore follow that kids should be able to run all over the place like little hellions. In general, reasonable people are going to keep reasonable control of their kids (i.e. keep them in their seats, keep them from shouting at the top of their lungs), and reasonable people are going to give kids leeway within those boundaries to be kids. What I'm specifically thinking of, through this whole thread, is the idiots who let their children run around like amphetamine-soaked demons being physically disruptive, and laugh it off with "Kids will be kids". There is a happy medium between "Children should be seen and not heard", and "Children should be seen and heard by everyone in the building." 529601[/snapback] Warning, tangent. Question. Was Abe Lincoln a reasonable man? If you don't get it... Do a little research on his parenting.
X. Benedict Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Was Abe Lincoln a reasonable man? 529810[/snapback] This is a trick question: This year I learned that Lincoln was a closeted homosexual, a manic depressive, suicidal, misunderstood, psychic for having premonitions of his own demise, a participant in seances and the dark arts, and a doting father unable to control his own children or spending habits of his wife.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Warning, tangent. Question. Was Abe Lincoln a reasonable man? If you don't get it... Do a little research on his parenting. 529810[/snapback] Based on his war record, not really...
The Dean Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Warning, tangent. Question. Was Abe Lincoln a reasonable man? If you don't get it... Do a little research on his parenting. 529810[/snapback] (and you deserve evey one of those) WTF does that have top do with ANYTHING? What was reasonable in the mid-1800's was...well...was SLAVERY. Yeah, let's use the 1800's as our standard for what's reasonable today.
Beerball Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Quit hijacking threads, Bib! 526935[/snapback] Where'd you find the gopher?
Ghost of BiB Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Where'd you find the gopher? 529990[/snapback] It's a beaver...
erynthered Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 It's a beaver... 530056[/snapback] This may not be safe for work, but then again, it may. http://www.beavershaver.com/images/Girl%20...e%202%20Low.jpg
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 This is a trick question: This year I learned that Lincoln was a closeted homosexual, a manic depressive, suicidal, misunderstood, psychic for having premonitions of his own demise, a participant in seances and the dark arts, and a doting father unable to control his own children or spending habits of his wife. 529845[/snapback] I guess that sums it up... Crazy bastard was a very UNREASONABLE man!
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Based on his war record, not really... 529900[/snapback] See my above post.
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 (and you deserve evey one of those) WTF does that have top do with ANYTHING? What was reasonable in the mid-1800's was...well...was SLAVERY. Yeah, let's use the 1800's as our standard for what's reasonable today. 529913[/snapback] I did say: Warning, tangent. Geesh!
X. Benedict Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 I guess that sums it up... Crazy bastard was a very UNREASONABLE man! 530093[/snapback] Yep. Time to put the Indian back on the penny.
The Dean Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 I did say: Warning, tangent. Geesh! 530100[/snapback] My bad, then
GoodBye Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 It's a beaver... 530056[/snapback] I was joking about that. I'm not sure what it is. When I downloaded the pic it said that it was a rabbit.
GoodBye Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 This may not be safe for work, but then again, it may. http://www.beavershaver.com/images/Girl%20...e%202%20Low.jpg 530086[/snapback] I'm not even going to look at this...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 I was joking about that. I'm not sure what it is. When I downloaded the pic it said that it was a rabbit. 530437[/snapback] I thought it was a squirrel, to be honest.
GoodBye Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 I thought it was a squirrel, to be honest. 530440[/snapback] I think maybe it's a cross between a squirrel, a rabbit, and a beaver.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 I think maybe it's a cross between a squirrel, a rabbit, and a beaver. 530446[/snapback] A squabber?
Recommended Posts