JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 It was supposed to be the rest of the team coddling JP thru his first season. Yeah, right. Next Sunday is gonna be ugly
nodnarb Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 The problem is mainly Mike Mularkey. He coaches to not lose. His playcalling is so bad, SOO bad, especially in critical situations, and you can see in those decisions a fear that no NFL head coach should have. Check out the scared look on Mularkey's face whenever a game situation becomes dire. That look on his face is how he coaches. He wants his team to be mentally tough but he doesn't call plays that reflect a mental toughness. He wants his team to finish games but he doesn't call plays that help them do that. And the postgame reporters don't do their job, either. They NEVER ask him tough questions. They NEVER challlenge him.
dave mcbride Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 The problem is mainly Mike Mularkey. He coaches to not lose. His playcalling is so bad, SOO bad, especially in critical situations, and you can see in those decisions a fear that no NFL head coach should have. Check out the scared look on Mularkey's face whenever a game situation becomes dire. That look on his face is how he coaches. He wants his team to be mentally tough but he doesn't call plays that reflect a mental toughness. He wants his team to finish games but he doesn't call plays that help them do that. And the postgame reporters don't do their job, either. They NEVER ask him tough questions. They NEVER challlenge him. 519725[/snapback] if he's coaching not to lose, then why is he running about the most complicated play action pass possible on 1st and goal from the 3 with a 20 point lead? why not a tried and true pass to a TE in the middle of the endzone?
Corp000085 Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 if he's coaching not to lose, then why is he running about the most complicated play action pass possible on 1st and goal from the 3 with a 20 point lead? why not a tried and true pass to a TE in the middle of the endzone? 519773[/snapback] because pete metzelaars is 49?
dave mcbride Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 because pete metzelaars is 49? 519783[/snapback] i don't disagree. why don't have a TE who is a competent pass catcher on the roster??
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 because pete metzelaars is 49? 519783[/snapback] Post of the year! Yet another TD failure. Failure to address the TE situation.
EDinRTP Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 Should have run the tight end screen to Reuben Gant.
stuckincincy Posted December 5, 2005 Posted December 5, 2005 Next Sunday is gonna be ugly 519697[/snapback] Their next 3 games are against current division leaders...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 5, 2005 Posted December 5, 2005 Their next 3 games are against current division leaders... 519999[/snapback] YAY! 4-12 here we come! Time to cut the high-priced vets
Recommended Posts