R. Rich Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 What happened? Did a reporter get behind him for a score? 519449[/snapback] Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralonzo Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Why the hell wasn't Nate covering Chambers on that TD. He was on him all day today, but not at the most important time. 519455[/snapback] Even if Nate was on him, he wasn't on him: C. Chambers 15 rec / 238 yds / 1 TD / Long 57 (remember than one?) Either Nate is overrated, or Jerry Gray is a moron. Or Nate is a moron. Or Jerry Gray is overrated. Or all of the above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Dont forget our "playmaker" dropping an INT for an easy 6 points... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike32282 Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Dont forget our "playmaker" dropping an INT for an easy 6 points... 519801[/snapback] He was too busy planning his touchdown celebration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Other boards are saying Moulds also melted down during post-game interviews, can anybody here confirm this? Did anyone else hear moulds when he was interviewed? He basically said that hes fed up with the coaching. He said something along the lines of "i was fine with the play in the first quarter, but then we're up 21-0 and we're supposed to be a pound the football team and we line up in spread formations and run all this crazy stuff and turn the ball over" keeps going and says "i dont know whats gonna happen. Im not gonna go all TO over this...im gonna ride out the next 4 games and next year if im here, im here and if not, then im elsewhere." so basically we either keep moulds or keep mularkey one or the other? Now WGR is saying that mularkey pulled moulds because of poor route running, but then said NOTHING to him until after the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACTOBILLSFAN Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Why the hell wasn't Nate covering Chambers on that TD. He was on him all day today, but not at the most important time. 519455[/snapback] Um I guess he was "covering" him all day... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Um I guess he was "covering" him all day... 519909[/snapback] Nate Clements = Andy Katzenmoyer = Brian Bosworth < RJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Um I guess he was "covering" him all day... 519909[/snapback] To be fair to Nate, the Bills were in a zone on the long Chambers reception at the end and Fletch and Vincent were on him. Has Vincent gotten over in time to help cover a WR since the first few weeks of the season? The guy is always late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts