BillnutinHouston Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 MM tells Sam Adams before last week that he thought we had a better chance to win without him, then benches Moulds inexplicably today. When asked in the press conference to explain, he said "that's between Eric and I". MM is more obsessed with his power than he is winning games. And his record shows he's being rather successful in this regard.
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 Send his ass back to Pittsburgh, along with ol Whitey who will be rowing the canoe down da ol Allegheny.
BB2004 Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 MM tells Sam Adams before last week that he thought we had a better chance to win without him, then benches Moulds inexplicably today. When asked in the press conference to explain, he said "that's between Eric and I". MM is more obsessed with his power than he is winning games. And his record shows he's being rather successful in this regard. 519429[/snapback] Two good players not playing in cruical situations makes you wonder what really going on behind the scenes
Sound_n_Fury Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 MM is more obsessed with his power than he is winning games. 519429[/snapback] It looks like the vets are revolting... (dual meaning intended!!)
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 It looks like the vets are revolting... (dual meaning intended!!) 519598[/snapback] Good, cut em. Start early! Why !@#$ing wait? Cut Eric, Nate, Sam Adams, Milloy and Vincent!
ajzepp Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 It looks like the vets are revolting... (dual meaning intended!!) 519598[/snapback] LOL.....nice!
BillnutinHouston Posted December 4, 2005 Author Posted December 4, 2005 MM has lost the team. Pure and simple.
The Jokeman Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 Two good players not playing in cruical situations makes you wonder what really going on behind the scenes 519575[/snapback] MM's probably coming to grips that both Adams and Moulds won't be here next year and trying to see what he has on the roster in terms of potential replacements. It's obvious to me today's game was about showcasing Evans and Parrish to see if they are a legitimate 1-2 or not.
Sound_n_Fury Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 MM's probably coming to grips that both Adams and Moulds won't be here next year and trying to see what he has on the roster in terms of potential replacements. It's obvious to me today's game was about showcasing Evans and Parrish to see if they are a legitimate 1-2 or not. 519629[/snapback] Good point, but that sends a big negative vibe through the team, IMO. Like him or not, EM has always been a pretty stand up guy on the field for the Bills. I'm not saying the team owes him anything, but a move like that causes the players to wonder WTF is going on and can be a distraction when it didn't have to be one...
The Jokeman Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 Good point, but that sends a big negative vibe through the team, IMO. Like him or not, EM has always been a pretty stand up guy on the field for the Bills. I'm not saying the team owes him anything, but a move like that causes the players to wonder WTF is going on and can be a distraction when it didn't have to be one... 519653[/snapback] I don't necessarly agree with the idea just explaining why I feel EM was on the bench most of the game.
HurlyBurly51 Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 Good point, but that sends a big negative vibe through the team, IMO. Like him or not, EM has always been a pretty stand up guy on the field for the Bills. I'm not saying the team owes him anything, but a move like that causes the players to wonder WTF is going on and can be a distraction when it didn't have to be one... 519653[/snapback] It's a no class way to treat one of your franchises all time leading receivers. So petty and a prick move to take away the consecutive games streak.
b3x Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 Moulds deserves more respect. he has been a staple since the super bowl days, year in year out the leading receiver. he catches the ball when it is thrown his way, ie he does his job. he is still a great receiver and has been loyal. this is the part of pro football i hate. When a great asset to the franchise is done wrong. in the past, we saw thurman, andre, and bruce done in similar fashion. he is the leading receiver on the team this year. not throwing the ball to him today is simply ridiculous.
bdelma Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 They don't buy into MM scheme that would be my guess.
Rico Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 Moulds deserves more respect. he has been a staple since the super bowl days, 519705[/snapback] Who's Super Bowl days? The Broncos?
b3x Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 Who's Super Bowl days? The Broncos? 519714[/snapback] ok ok ... since the playoff days ... remember those?
Recommended Posts