Rico Posted December 3, 2005 Share Posted December 3, 2005 70-3 right now halfway through the 3rd... with what I've seen today, I would have to say NO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted December 3, 2005 Share Posted December 3, 2005 70-3 right now halfway through the 3rd...with what I've seen today, I would have to say NO. 518508[/snapback] And people actually doubted that Texas would beat Colorado, I even heard on the radio saying ya USC is a lock but Texas Colorado is a risky game. Now i'm new to college football so I actually followed this game thinking it would be close. It sucks to work on saturdays and sundays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdelma Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 He'll be a new man down there. He bill slim and mean, yah right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwight Drane Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 The Mike Williams bashing is rediculous. It's one thing to say the guy is overpaid and shouldn't have been the #4 pick, but he is still the best lineman we have. The guy weighs 380 granted, but that's down from the 410 he played at last year. He blows an ankle week 2....comes back 3 weeks later and ends up hurting opposite knee while overcompensating for bad leg. Then when his mobility is limited, he has to rely on his upper body for strength and has to play a new position, so he hurts his chest. It isn't rocket science...it's the same reason Moulds went down the crapper a few years ago and never made it back the same....his groin was done on one side, so he ended up doing the hamstring on the opposite side. Stats in 3 full games Williams played: Hou-W McGahee 117yds Mia-W 86yds NYJ-W 143yds Games Williams was out or limited: TB-L McGahee 34yds ATL-L 140yds NO-L 84yds OAK-L 50yds NE-L 136yds KC-W 66yds SD-L 39yds CAR-L 53yds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like A Mofo Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Why is this relevant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 70-3 right now halfway through the 3rd...with what I've seen today, I would have to say NO. 518508[/snapback] While I like Blalock, MW was the better player at Texas. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if you didn't even know Justin's name when you made this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted December 4, 2005 Author Share Posted December 4, 2005 While I like Blalock, MW was the better player at Texas. 518665[/snapback] I'm talking about present-day MW. It appears that he has regressed since 2001. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if you didn't even know Justin's name when you made this thread. 518665[/snapback] Who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 I'm talking about present-day MW. It appears that he has regressed since 2001. Who? 518670[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawgg Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 The Mike Williams bashing is rediculous. It's one thing to say the guy is overpaid and shouldn't have been the #4 pick, but he is still the best lineman we have. 518645[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fake-Fat Sunny Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 518682[/snapback] No, he would have longed used up his four years of eligibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts