Mikie2times Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 2006 Draft Order The top 4 spots seem like they will be filled by Houston, SF, the Jets, and GB. All four of those teams are really struggling, and all have 2 wins. After those teams it really is anybody guess right now. The Bills come in at #10, and as of now have played the easiest schedule out of the higher picking teams, that means all tiebreakers go to Buffalo. My guess is we end up anywhere from 5-13. Also note that Tennessee will be drafting very high likely giving us two top ten 3rd rounders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 Start looking for smurf WR candidates. It's the TD way. Lineman be damned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 Start looking for smurf WR candidates. It's the TD way. Lineman be damned 514142[/snapback] I have to imagine an OL or DT is priority #1. I'd like to see DT in the first round. Rookie DT's can come right in and blow things up. A rookie OL will need grooming and I'd rather see us address that through free agency, with maybe a couple of mid-round picks on the OL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 Man there are a lot of for-shiat teams in this league. 13 teams with 4 wins or less? That ain't parity, that's dreck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puppet Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 I have to agree. I think that we should go DT in round 1 and possibly in later rounds as well. We still have a 2 and two 3s that are all pretty high choices. Round out with OL, Safety, and LB or CB with those choices. I'd love to see us look at a top free agent OL that can be plugged in right away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch19079 Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 i think we should take a TE. TEs privide a great mismatch in todays NFL. i like campbell, but hes not a real recieving threat. it would help JP also, giving him a TE who is big and fast. there is a guy at UCLA, who would help our Offense a lot. i know we need lineman, and DTs, and a #3 CB. but a great TE is a rare thing to find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 i think we should take a TE. TEs privide a great mismatch in todays NFL. i like campbell, but hes not a real recieving threat. it would help JP also, giving him a TE who is big and fast. there is a guy at UCLA, who would help our Offense a lot. i know we need lineman, and DTs, and a #3 CB. but a great TE is a rare thing to find. 514202[/snapback] They took a big/fast TE this year. He just has a bum knee right now. Mercedes (I think that's the UCLA's TE name) is good, but will most likely be a 2nd rounder. No need to take a TE in the first two rounds for the Bills. They are in dire straights in other positions. Those must be priority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Real Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 i think we should take a TE. TEs privide a great mismatch in todays NFL. i like campbell, but hes not a real recieving threat. it would help JP also, giving him a TE who is big and fast. there is a guy at UCLA, who would help our Offense a lot. i know we need lineman, and DTs, and a #3 CB. but a great TE is a rare thing to find. 514202[/snapback] Everett is our TE. Big and fast. He'll do wonders for J.P. T-R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obie_wan Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 I have to agree. I think that we should go DT in round 1 and possibly in later rounds as well. We still have a 2 and two 3s that are all pretty high choices. Round out with OL, Safety, and LB or CB with those choices. I'd love to see us look at a top free agent OL that can be plugged in right away. 514175[/snapback] Vince Wilfork oh wait, we passed on him last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 Man there are a lot of for-shiat teams in this league.13 teams with 4 wins or less? That ain't parity, that's dreck. 514171[/snapback] That ain't parity, that's status quo of the NFC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 2006 Draft Order The top 4 spots seem like they will be filled by Houston, SF, the Jets, and GB. All four of those teams are really struggling, and all have 2 wins. After those teams it really is anybody guess right now. The Bills come in at #10, and as of now have played the easiest schedule out of the higher picking teams, that means all tiebreakers go to Buffalo. My guess is we end up anywhere from 5-13. Also note that Tennessee will be drafting very high likely giving us two top ten 3rd rounders. 514135[/snapback] According to your link, we're 9, not 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 Vince Wilfork oh wait, we passed on him last year. 514257[/snapback] Year before last...And they Drafted Evans and JP that Year so...I'm no Fan of this Scouting Dept. But I'll give them a pass on Wilfork... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 Check out that Indy SOS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 I have to imagine an OL or DT is priority #1. I'd like to see DT in the first round. Rookie DT's can come right in and blow things up. A rookie OL will need grooming and I'd rather see us address that through free agency, with maybe a couple of mid-round picks on the OL. 514148[/snapback] Since it is a Tackle (Offense) rich draft, we should get a premier DT in the 1st round and then get a OT in the 2nd round....Other option would be is to trade down that 1st rounder to 2 1st rounders and pick up some depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 i think we should take a TE. TEs privide a great mismatch in todays NFL. i like campbell, but hes not a real recieving threat. it would help JP also, giving him a TE who is big and fast. there is a guy at UCLA, who would help our Offense a lot. i know we need lineman, and DTs, and a #3 CB. but a great TE is a rare thing to find. 514202[/snapback] We already have one drafted last year....Everett...We won't be drafting a TE in the early rounds until we know if Everett can play or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB2004 Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 2006 Draft Order The top 4 spots seem like they will be filled by Houston, SF, the Jets, and GB. All four of those teams are really struggling, and all have 2 wins. After those teams it really is anybody guess right now. The Bills come in at #10, and as of now have played the easiest schedule out of the higher picking teams, that means all tiebreakers go to Buffalo. My guess is we end up anywhere from 5-13. Also note that Tennessee will be drafting very high likely giving us two top ten 3rd rounders. 514135[/snapback] I think it's important to look to the future. If some how we can get Ferguson from Virginia that would be good. He's very good in pass blocking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.1b7fb4086290c3afc001a7900b31fab0.png)
Recommended Posts