stuckincincy Posted November 22, 2005 Posted November 22, 2005 On the occasions when he's been pressured, he's played like total crap. 510146[/snapback] That sums it up nicely.
Bflojohn Posted November 22, 2005 Posted November 22, 2005 Hey Rico, a fill in the blanks game where "you" can't fill in any of them? That's NO fun!
X. Benedict Posted November 22, 2005 Posted November 22, 2005 2-8, I agree. We still would have beaten Houston and maybe somebody else.
Ramius Posted November 22, 2005 Posted November 22, 2005 1-9 maybe 2-8. We would have beat houston, and prolly the jets, because the jets REALLY are that damn bad.
jarthur31 Posted November 22, 2005 Posted November 22, 2005 LOL! The haters week after week find some reason to bring him up time after time. Only because they wish to have him back.
dundy249 Posted November 23, 2005 Posted November 23, 2005 Sorry you can say what you want but I say at least 6-4 We beat NE and Atlanta with Drew. Maybe 7-3
TheMadCap Posted November 23, 2005 Posted November 23, 2005 No one here seriously thinks we would have a better record with Drew. It's impossible, no one can watch the disaster that is the Bills OL and say things like that. No way. They are trying to put one over on you. We've all seen how Drew performs under our NFL worst OL....
JAMIEBUF12 Posted November 23, 2005 Posted November 23, 2005 probably the same maybe 1 game better,drew aint doing that great on the cowboys he just has a coach that knows how to use him.drew didnt beat the eagles the 2nd time around roy williams got that late interception for the cowboys and drew threw away the game to seattle so he cost them a game.drew is a decent qb on a team with a good offensive line and a good tight end.after td invested in drew he should have built a line to protect him,that is where td failed.
Orton's Arm Posted November 23, 2005 Posted November 23, 2005 If your team has a good to great offensive line, Drew is a better QB than Holcomb. If your team has an offensive line like ours, you need a guy who can dump the ball off, make something out of nothing, and above all not take the sack. You need Holcomb instead of Drew.
Ramius Posted November 23, 2005 Posted November 23, 2005 Sorry you can say what you want but I say at least 6-4 We beat NE and Atlanta with Drew. Maybe 7-3 510684[/snapback] What are you smoking that makes you think we'd have a shot in hell against NE with Drew? Hes bellycheck's personal b!tch...
HOF Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 Top 10 Times Drew Showed He Was A Leader With The Bills In 2003 & 2004:1. 2. 3. 4.. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.. 10. 510126[/snapback] he is 15-4 in last 19 games ( I think! ). I doubt that that has nothing to do with his leadership qualities as he is a QB!
dundy249 Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 What are you smoking that makes you think we'd have a shot in hell against NE with Drew? Hes bellycheck's personal b!tch... 511427[/snapback] Seems to be doing well with the less talented cowboys. 7-3 I believe. Maybe I am smoking the same thing people in Buffalo did when they ran Parker, Ziegler,....ect...out of town.
Oneida Lake Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 Seems to be doing well with the less talented cowboys.7-3 I believe. Maybe I am smoking the same thing people in Buffalo did when they ran Parker, Ziegler,....ect...out of town. 511634[/snapback] Without McGahee last year Drew started 0-4, with McGahee he finished 9-3. 10 full games with McGahee this year would probably have gotten him a 6-4 maybe 7-3. I think a final 9-7 record would be very likely and a tough loss in the first round.
Offside Number 76 Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 Record depends on whether the Bills had spent the offseason fixing what really is wrong with the team--the line--instead of picking a scapegoat. If the Bills had collected Dallas's line, there's no reason to believe the Bills wouldn't have Dallas's record. If the Bills merely kept the status quo from last year, the record would be just about what it is now.
Recommended Posts