meazza Posted November 19, 2005 Posted November 19, 2005 Could be goodbye Mr. Mularkey 507157[/snapback] As much as I question Mularkey's choices sometimes, I respect him more than I ever respected GW, I think he will be a good coach one day, doesnt seem to give up as his job is really not as easy as many armchair gm's make it sound
Dan Gross Posted November 19, 2005 Posted November 19, 2005 As much as I question Mularkey's choices sometimes, I respect him more than I ever respected GW, I think he will be a good coach one day, doesnt seem to give up as his job is really not as easy as many armchair gm's make it sound 507161[/snapback] What?! All you need to do is win every game....what's so tough about that?
meazza Posted November 19, 2005 Posted November 19, 2005 What?! All you need to do is win every game....what's so tough about that? 507165[/snapback] Silly me!! i forgot it was that easy
MDH Posted November 19, 2005 Posted November 19, 2005 Could be goodbye Mr. Mularkey 507157[/snapback] Not that Mularky is a great coach by any means, but he currently is in possession of a winning record with the Bills. It's hard to get rid of a guy with a winning record when the team has been stuck in the quagmire for the past 5-6 years.
jarthur31 Posted November 20, 2005 Posted November 20, 2005 Bills | Mularkey takes over play-callingFri, 18 Nov 2005 16:26:28 -0800 Mark Gaughan, of the Buffalo News, reports Buffalo Bills head coach Mike Mularkey has taken over primary play-calling duties from offensive coordinator Tom Clements. Goodbye, Mr. Clements! 507139[/snapback] This move should've been made last year.
/dev/null Posted November 20, 2005 Posted November 20, 2005 Lets recount: 1997: Dan Henning 1998-2000: Joe Pendry 2001: Mike Sheppard 2002-2003: Killdrive 2004-2005: Clements We go thru Offensive Coordinators faster than Kirk goes thru guys in red shirts, yet the offense continues to struggle. Maybe its not the guy at the top, but the guys in the trenches? They could hire Christ himself on a Ritz cracker as OC. But it would be like putting Patton in charge of the French Army
Tcali Posted November 20, 2005 Posted November 20, 2005 Whoa Nellie.... If Malarkey is now calling the plays, it would seem logical that it's an indictment being handed down on the OC. But wait just a minute. If that's the case, what the hell is Sam Wyche jibber-jabbering about up in the spotters booth, and to whom is he doing the jibber-jabbering to. I woulda thunk that Sam is setting the table for the OC and telling him what he's seeing. If that's the case, doesn't that dictate what the play calls will be based on the game plan that was drawn up, and doesn't Malarkey sign off on the game plan as well as the entire offensive design? I remember Jim Fassel taking over the play calling from Sean Peyton when he was with the Giants just a few seasons ago. He didn't end up firing him though and eventually Fassel was fired and Peyton ended up calling the plays for Bill Parcells in Dallas, as well as being a finalist for the Al Davis concierge derby, which, of course he turned down. Meanwhile Fassel was on the the Ravens as QB coach and then this year promoted to OC. Well, Fassel aint doing so hot and there's a good chance his HC and most of the staff is going to be getting a one way ticket out of Crabcakeville at the season's end. So, from my perspective, in this case, I've got to suspect that Malarkey has some culpability here too... and a lot. 506685[/snapback] Al Davis concierge derby???
Recommended Posts