Thailog80 Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Not to a break the bank deal but a reasonable one. He is playing fairly well and IMHO worthy of being brought back. He's a very good blocker and JP seems to have faith in him as well. Just my .02
MDH Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Agreed, he's not great but he's a solid 3 or 4 WR and JP looks his way quite a bit. It's fashionable to rag on Reed but he's played pretty well this year.
Kelly the Dog Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Man do I hate when Clements and Mularkey bring Josh Reed and Sam Aiken in as the two WRs because they are better blockers, bring them to the middle and then run the ball. It's just so very obvious and stupid.
IDBillzFan Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Kudos to the Tman for proper use of the phrase re-sign. Could very well be a TBD first.
stuckincincy Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Where is the multitude who wanted Reed's head?
MadBuffaloDisease Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Kudos to the Tman for proper use of the phrase re-sign. Could very well be a TBD first. Frick, and here I thought he was saying Josh should retire.
Recommended Posts