Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I don't think we can count on Sam Adams another season. Two straight years we have evidence of him playing outside the system, and it's obvious that kills our defense. Even if we kept him who on that list is the type of OL eating DT we need to compliment Sam? I suggested Ngata and Grady Jackson as next year’s duo, but regardless this is still very early even for speculating. I imagine the direction we go with the first pick will certainly be influenced if we can get one more 1st for Nate.

503169[/snapback]

The problem is Ngata is far from proven, if taking a DT in Round 1 I'd much rather have Rodrique Wright or Gabe Watson. If the Bills manage to franchise Nate and trade him it better be for a top 5 pick as rarely to rookies make an impact on a team especially if means making McGee our top CB as good as Terrence is he's still far from Nate's class.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
The problem is Ngata is far from proven, if taking a DT in Round 1 I'd much rather have Rodrique Wright or Gabe Watson.

503173[/snapback]

 

Watson is an overweight underachiever, as has been labled as lazy by most scouting services. Possibly Wright but I still like Ngatas future the best of the three.

Posted
Watson is an overweight underachiever, as has been labled as lazy by most scouting services.  Possibly Wright but I still like Ngatas future the best of the three.

503180[/snapback]

I'll agree Ngata has the best POTENTIAL of the three true the things you said about Watson could easily be used to describe Ngata as well. The only difference is Ngata is bigger and in a smaller conference which are two things that should be in his favor but the way I'm referencing them they're not.

Posted
I'll agree Ngata has the best POTENTIAL of the three true the things you said about Watson could easily be used to describe Ngata as well. The only difference is Ngata is bigger and in a smaller conference which are two things that should be in his favor but the way I'm referencing them they're not.

503185[/snapback]

 

I wouldn't exactly say the Pac-10 is a small conference compared to the Big Ten. If you look at rivals.com about the recruiting history the last three years of the Big Ten and Pac 10 the Pac-10 averages higher overall talent compared to the big 10, and the Pac 10 has produced the best team in college football since Miami in USC.

 

I'm saying this about Watson having witnessed it living in Wolverine country my whole life, the guy takes plays off, and is a real underachiever. Just not the kind of player I want near the Bills. If Ngata is the same way then the same goes for him, I just haven't heard or seen anything to indicate that.

Posted
I wouldn't exactly say the Pac-10 is a small conference compared to the Big Ten. If you look at rivals.com about the recruiting history the last three years of the Big Ten and Pac 10 the Pac-10 averages higher overall talent compared to the big 10, and the Pac 10 has produced the best team in college football since Miami in USC. 

 

I'm saying this about Watson having witnessed it living in Wolverine country my whole life, the guy takes plays off, and is a real underachiever. Just not the kind of player I want near the Bills. If Ngata is the same way then the same goes for him, I just haven't heard or seen anything to indicate that.

503223[/snapback]

I know the Pac-10 isn't that bad. I mean I am calling for us to take a guy from Stanford in the 2nd Round. Here's the predraft bio that has me worried about Ngata.

×
×
  • Create New...