gsurdam Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 Wow.... After reading all week that we would have to be very lucky to win this game , I am very pleased to see we did. I didn't get to see the game but it seems the defense stepped up this week and did the job. Also , welcome back JP !!! I was wondering if anyone remembered that Lee Evans was still on this team. Great win. Everyone rejoice !!!!!
/dev/null Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 its like that scene from Major League when they start winning.... They're still sh-tty
Dennis in NC Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 The Chiefs just sucked more today. When the Bills got the ball (on the fumble recovery) at the KC 12, I just knew they would not score on the opportunity. Sure enough, they gave it back to the Chiefs on a turnover. The Bills are just not a good team, but today they sucked less than their opponent. So, who thinks these Bills are playoff-bound??? Hmmm???
DCBongo Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 Thats the pisser, the Bills expolited the Chiefs and made me feel all warm and fuzzy like, "wow, they finnaly get it, we have the team TD promissed", and the Rochester D&C will write some nice articles and I'll think "Yeah, San Diego isn't that good. And KC ran well but we were able to dominate... we could win this game". Then they will actual play the game, and San Diego with have a Bruski-esk effort and the this feel of you and hope will evaporate back to cry of "This team blows" The moral of this - we have a week to enjoy a good win, lets enjoy the now
Campy Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 its like that scene from Major League when they start winning.... They're still sh-tty 501547[/snapback] I appreciate your optimism.
rockpile Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 I like them just as much now as I did before the game!
Alaska Darin Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 It's pretty obvious alot of you weren't fans before the 90s. If you think this team is sh-------, you have NO clue.
Campy Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 It's pretty obvious alot of you weren't fans before the 90s. If you think this team is sh-------, you have NO clue. 501652[/snapback] Truly. Damn kids.
Astrobot Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 I like them just as much now as I did before the game! Post of the Year.
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 It's pretty obvious alot of you weren't fans before the 90s. If you think this team is sh-------, you have NO clue. 501652[/snapback] Amen and Hallelujah! Someone offers perspective... Thanks AD!
Alexander Hamilton Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 It's pretty obvious alot of you weren't fans before the 90s. If you think this team is sh-------, you have NO clue. 501652[/snapback] 223 yards of offense. Total. 3 more than Trent Green had passing, and about a hundred more than LJ had rushing. I'm happy for the win, but it was hardly a thing of beauty.
Alaska Darin Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 223 yards of offense. Total. 3 more than Trent Green had passing, and about a hundred more than LJ had rushing. I'm happy for the win, but it was hardly a thing of beauty. 501708[/snapback] So? Go back and watch some Hank Bullough or Kay Stephenson coached games. Nothing better than getting your ass kicked in every phase of the game pretty much every week.
rockpile Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 223 yards of offense. Total. 3 more than Trent Green had passing, and about a hundred more than LJ had rushing. I'm happy for the win, but it was hardly a thing of beauty. 501708[/snapback] The Bills won, right? THAT is the only stat anyone remembers or cares about. You choose: win the game or put up impressive numbers. Didn't we "beat" the Pats in several categories last week? Who won?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 223 yards of offense. Total. 3 more than Trent Green had passing, and about a hundred more than LJ had rushing. I'm happy for the win, but it was hardly a thing of beauty. 501708[/snapback] And three fewer turnovers. Takeaways can (not will...but can) make up for a lot.
Spiderweb Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 It's pretty obvious alot of you weren't fans before the 90s. If you think this team is sh-------, you have NO clue. 501652[/snapback] Let see, 1968 (1-13), or from 1976 thru 79, or how about those beautiful 2 win teams under Kay Stephenson in consecutive years in the mid 80's (84-85?).......The only team in recent memory as futile as those teams were was the our 2001 edition under Greg, "Man Boobs" Williams...... 1968 was so bad, we finished with Ed Rutkowski as our QB.............. Kemp went down, followed by Flores, followed by Kay Stephenson, then the infamous, Dan Darraugh, go Eddie go.....
Alaska Darin Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Let see, 1968 (1-13), or from 1976 thru 79, or how about those beautiful 2 win teams under Kay Stephenson in consecutive years in the mid 80's (84-85?).......The only team in recent memory as futile as those teams were was the our 2001 edition under Greg, "Man Boobs" Williams...... 1968 was so bad, we finished with Ed Rutkowski as our QB.............. Kemp went down, followed by Flores, followed by Kay Stephenson, then the infamous, Dan Darraugh, go Eddie go..... 501856[/snapback] How about 7 playoff appearances in 28 years before the SB seasons? Aack.
buffaloboyinATL Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 So? Go back and watch some Hank Bullough or Kay Stephenson coached games. Nothing better than getting your ass kicked in every phase of the game pretty much every week. 501715[/snapback] No doubt. I thoroughly enjoyed this game. JP looked very good, Defense held it's own. We won. I'll take it. I'd rather win ugly than lose pretty.
Beerstm Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 It's pretty obvious alot of you weren't fans before the 90s. If you think this team is sh-------, you have NO clue. 501652[/snapback] Yes.. the mid 80's the good ol' days Knock, knock.. who's there O. O who? 0-6!
Alaska Darin Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Yes.. the mid 80's the good ol' days Knock, knock.. who's there O. O who? 0-6! 501865[/snapback]
Recommended Posts