slothrop Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 Who Killed Pat Tillman Article by Mike Niman (very liberal columnist). Do the facts speak for themselves? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 Who Killed Pat Tillman Article by Mike Niman (very liberal columnist). Do the facts speak for themselves? 500984[/snapback] Yawn. Old news, done to death already. Search the board on the subject for the answers. The only new thing this retard columnist writes is that fratricide on the battlefield is now a "crime"...which only demonstrates how little Niman knows about battlefields and crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tux of Borg Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 I tend to believe the story I heard from my two buddies over in 2nd batt. But what do they know. Not to say that the author's facts are wrong, but the way he presents them is misleading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 Most of the article is left wing screed and heresay. Friendly fire has killed people in every war in history. Nothing new. Just happened to a well known person this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 Wasn't he crushed by Mir, revived as a zombie via Worcestershire sauce embalming. Then cut in half with a chainsaw by Kyle to end zombie curse. And afterwards, didn't he rise from his grave again but is immediately crushed by a falling angel statue and then by a crashing airplane? Or did Ozzy bite his head off? Or was he killed by an goldfish from Evil Cartman's dimension? Or was he crushed by the Underpants Gnomes cart full of underpants? Or maybe it was by Phonics Monkey? Or maybe I'm thinking of someone else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 PPP sure has gotten boring, hasn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 PPP sure has gotten boring, hasn't it? 501172[/snapback] Really, where's a good Deb thread when you need one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 Really, where's a good Deb thread when you need one. 501406[/snapback] We can write our own: BUSH NEOCON OIL HALLIBURTON NEOCON (again) just sprinkle some other words around those and we're all set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 We can write our own: BUSH NEOCON OIL HALLIBURTON NEOCON (again) just sprinkle some other words around those and we're all set. 501441[/snapback] go paste some of those over at: http://www.madlibs.org/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted November 14, 2005 Share Posted November 14, 2005 We can write our own: BUSH NEOCON OIL HALLIBURTON NEOCON (again) just sprinkle some other words around those and we're all set. 501441[/snapback] You forgot WINGNUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campy Posted November 14, 2005 Share Posted November 14, 2005 You forgot WINGNUT 502930[/snapback] I expected 'Chicken Hawk" but "Wing Nut" will suffice I suppose... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted November 14, 2005 Share Posted November 14, 2005 You forgot WINGNUT 502930[/snapback] What are you wearing? Something involving spiked heels and leather? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finknottle Posted November 14, 2005 Share Posted November 14, 2005 Forget the second half conspiracy theory part. Can someone non-partisan tell me if the first half (his being anti-Bush, fan of Chomsky, etc) is generally accepted and known? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 What are you wearing? Something involving spiked heels and leather? 503005[/snapback] You just lie there in wait don't you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 You forgot WINGNUT 502930[/snapback] You forgot Poland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slothrop Posted November 15, 2005 Author Share Posted November 15, 2005 Forget the second half conspiracy theory part. Can someone non-partisan tell me if the first half (his being anti-Bush, fan of Chomsky, etc) is generally accepted and known? 503013[/snapback] Wikipedia Encyclopedia S.F. Chronicle Media Matters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 You just lie there in wait don't you. 503083[/snapback] She's really good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 She's really good. 503131[/snapback] Maybe we can get her to cook dinner for Pete. Does she ride a bike? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 Wikipedia Encyclopedia S.F. Chronicle Media Matters 503124[/snapback] Oh, yeah...those are credible sources... Someone questions a set of suppositions in your original link, so as a confirming source you link to...the source of the original article? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finknottle Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 Oh, yeah...those are credible sources... Someone questions a set of suppositions in your original link, so as a confirming source you link to...the source of the original article? 503206[/snapback] Actually, I appreciate his posting: simple references, without editorializing. While I don't place much stock in the San Francisco Chronicle, and know that Wikipedia is only as professional as the volunteers who contribute (and thus generally much better for scientific topics than controversial), I'm comfortable taking the slants into account. So whether or not the claims are true (or have been subsequently credited or discredited), I am at least convinced that they are out there and not entirely in the fringe. That to me is very interesting. Don't know how I missed it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts