slothrop Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 Who Killed Pat Tillman Article by Mike Niman (very liberal columnist). Do the facts speak for themselves?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 Who Killed Pat Tillman Article by Mike Niman (very liberal columnist). Do the facts speak for themselves? 500984[/snapback] Yawn. Old news, done to death already. Search the board on the subject for the answers. The only new thing this retard columnist writes is that fratricide on the battlefield is now a "crime"...which only demonstrates how little Niman knows about battlefields and crime.
Tux of Borg Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 I tend to believe the story I heard from my two buddies over in 2nd batt. But what do they know. Not to say that the author's facts are wrong, but the way he presents them is misleading.
Wacka Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 Most of the article is left wing screed and heresay. Friendly fire has killed people in every war in history. Nothing new. Just happened to a well known person this time.
/dev/null Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 Wasn't he crushed by Mir, revived as a zombie via Worcestershire sauce embalming. Then cut in half with a chainsaw by Kyle to end zombie curse. And afterwards, didn't he rise from his grave again but is immediately crushed by a falling angel statue and then by a crashing airplane? Or did Ozzy bite his head off? Or was he killed by an goldfish from Evil Cartman's dimension? Or was he crushed by the Underpants Gnomes cart full of underpants? Or maybe it was by Phonics Monkey? Or maybe I'm thinking of someone else
Ghost of BiB Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 PPP sure has gotten boring, hasn't it?
Chef Jim Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 PPP sure has gotten boring, hasn't it? 501172[/snapback] Really, where's a good Deb thread when you need one.
SilverNRed Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 Really, where's a good Deb thread when you need one. 501406[/snapback] We can write our own: BUSH NEOCON OIL HALLIBURTON NEOCON (again) just sprinkle some other words around those and we're all set.
/dev/null Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 We can write our own: BUSH NEOCON OIL HALLIBURTON NEOCON (again) just sprinkle some other words around those and we're all set. 501441[/snapback] go paste some of those over at: http://www.madlibs.org/
blzrul Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 We can write our own: BUSH NEOCON OIL HALLIBURTON NEOCON (again) just sprinkle some other words around those and we're all set. 501441[/snapback] You forgot WINGNUT
Campy Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 You forgot WINGNUT 502930[/snapback] I expected 'Chicken Hawk" but "Wing Nut" will suffice I suppose...
Ghost of BiB Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 You forgot WINGNUT 502930[/snapback] What are you wearing? Something involving spiked heels and leather?
finknottle Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Forget the second half conspiracy theory part. Can someone non-partisan tell me if the first half (his being anti-Bush, fan of Chomsky, etc) is generally accepted and known?
Chef Jim Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 What are you wearing? Something involving spiked heels and leather? 503005[/snapback] You just lie there in wait don't you.
Pete Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 You forgot WINGNUT 502930[/snapback] You forgot Poland
slothrop Posted November 15, 2005 Author Posted November 15, 2005 Forget the second half conspiracy theory part. Can someone non-partisan tell me if the first half (his being anti-Bush, fan of Chomsky, etc) is generally accepted and known? 503013[/snapback] Wikipedia Encyclopedia S.F. Chronicle Media Matters
Ghost of BiB Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 You just lie there in wait don't you. 503083[/snapback] She's really good.
Chef Jim Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 She's really good. 503131[/snapback] Maybe we can get her to cook dinner for Pete. Does she ride a bike?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Wikipedia Encyclopedia S.F. Chronicle Media Matters 503124[/snapback] Oh, yeah...those are credible sources... Someone questions a set of suppositions in your original link, so as a confirming source you link to...the source of the original article?
finknottle Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Oh, yeah...those are credible sources... Someone questions a set of suppositions in your original link, so as a confirming source you link to...the source of the original article? 503206[/snapback] Actually, I appreciate his posting: simple references, without editorializing. While I don't place much stock in the San Francisco Chronicle, and know that Wikipedia is only as professional as the volunteers who contribute (and thus generally much better for scientific topics than controversial), I'm comfortable taking the slants into account. So whether or not the claims are true (or have been subsequently credited or discredited), I am at least convinced that they are out there and not entirely in the fringe. That to me is very interesting. Don't know how I missed it...
Recommended Posts