Crap Throwing Monkey Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Hmm, a plan that makes sense. 502289[/snapback] That's why I'll never hold an elected office. Well, that, and I'm an ass hole.
Campy Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Oil drilling in countries with no environmental/human rights rules and then transporting it across the most delicate ecosystem on the planet = Good Oil drilling in the country with the most stringent environmental rules in the most desolate place on the planet = Bush 499852[/snapback] Since when has the US had the "most stringent environmental rules"?
Alaska Darin Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Since when has the US had the "most stringent environmental rules"? 502793[/snapback] You have no clue. Seriously. It's absolutely amazing the rules the oil companies and their support entities live under in Alaska.
chicot Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 You have no clue. Seriously. It's absolutely amazing the rules the oil companies and their support entities live under in Alaska. 503164[/snapback] At the risk of sounding like the monkey, Alaska is not a country. Alaska may or may not have very strict rules regarding oil companies (I don't know) but that still doesn't mean that the US as a whole has "the most stringent environmental rules".
RkFast Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 At the risk of sounding like the monkey, Alaska is not a country. Alaska may or may not have very strict rules regarding oil companies (I don't know) but that still doesn't mean that the US as a whole has "the most stringent environmental rules". 503680[/snapback] MAYBE not. Id bet the U.S. is in the top five, however.
Alaska Darin Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 At the risk of sounding like the monkey, Alaska is not a country. Alaska may or may not have very strict rules regarding oil companies (I don't know) but that still doesn't mean that the US as a whole has "the most stringent environmental rules". 503680[/snapback] Spoken like someone who doesn't live here or work in the industry. Thanks for the "insight." The rules in Alaska are patterned after the rules in other developing states and virtually everything has stringent federal oversight - but I'm sure you have a clue because you know so much about the subject. The Top 5 oil producing countries on the planet are Saudi Arabia, the U.S., Russia, Iran, and Venezuela. Gee, I wonder which of these would have the most stringent environmental rules AND actually some semblence of enforcement?
chicot Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Spoken like someone who doesn't live here or work in the industry. Thanks for the "insight." The rules in Alaska are patterned after the rules in other developing states and virtually everything has stringent federal oversight - but I'm sure you have a clue because you know so much about the subject. The Top 5 oil producing countries on the planet are Saudi Arabia, the U.S., Russia, Iran, and Venezuela. Gee, I wonder which of these would have the most stringent environmental rules AND actually some semblence of enforcement? 503786[/snapback] Strange, I don't actually recall saying that I had any "insight" nor did I claim to "know so much about the subject". It seems that under the new rules of the PPP board, you are forbidden from making any comment whatsoever unless you have expert knowledge of the subject.
Alaska Darin Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 knowledge of the subject. 503970[/snapback] How about at least some? Or do you have so little control of your "Anti-US" emotion that you just can't help yourself?
IowaBill Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 How about at least some? Or do you have so little control of your "Anti-US" emotion that you just can't help yourself? 504017[/snapback] Who peed in your Wheaties?????? Go back and read his post and see where he said anything that would warrant the response you had.
Alaska Darin Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Who peed in your Wheaties?????? Go back and read his post and see where he said anything that would warrant the response you had. 504035[/snapback] Uh, who gave you the golden twinkie of judgement for today? When I need your opinion on message board subtleties, I'll let you know.
IowaBill Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Uh, who gave you the golden twinkie of judgement for today? When I need your opinion on message board subtleties, I'll let you know. 504045[/snapback] Typical AD response. The PPP board is littered with them. Perhaps we need more stringent environmental regulations.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Uh, who gave you the golden twinkie of judgement for today? When I need your opinion on message board subtleties, I'll let you know. 504045[/snapback] Not capitalizing the name is a grave sign of disrespect to the Golden Twinkie of Judgement, even if you are the 12-point Arial of original thought.
Alaska Darin Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Typical AD response. The PPP board is littered with them. Perhaps we need more stringent environmental regulations. 504071[/snapback] If nothing else, I am consistant. You looking to be a moderator? I can send over the short bus to pick you up. Bring your helmet.
Campy Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Uh, who gave you the golden twinkie of judgement for today? When I need your opinion on message board subtleties, I'll let you know. 504045[/snapback] Golden twinkie of judgment?
chicot Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 How about at least some? Or do you have so little control of your "Anti-US" emotion that you just can't help yourself? 504017[/snapback] Stating that Alaska is not the entire USA is "anti-US"? Wierd.
Recommended Posts