Orton's Arm Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Below is a list of what I would consider TD's avoidable mistakes: 1. The final four candidates for 2001's head coach position. During the Wade Phillips era, the defensive scheme was excellent, the players always came to play, and the defense seemed to be at its best when the stakes were highest. His coaching problems were on offense and special teams. Clearly, what was needed was a coach who could fix the offensive coaching problems while leaving the defense alone, much as Gruden did for Tampa Bay. Instead, the final four candidates for the head coaching job were all from the defensive side of the ball. Gregg Williams' tenure resulted in a decrease in the quality of defensive coaching, while doing nothing to solve the offensive coaching problems. 2. TD's treatment of the QB position. At the time it was made, the Bledsoe trade was clearly a mistake. The man in the best position to evaluate Bledsoe--Bill Belichick--wouldn't have traded him to a division rival if he'd thought Bledsoe still had the potential for greatness. Arguably the biggest difference between Brady and Bledsoe is how much more quickly Brady scans the field. TD had to know Bledsoe would read the field even more slowly over time, and this problem would be made worse by Buffalo's problems with the offensive line. Many or most experts felt the 2004 draft had a big three when it came to QBs: Manning, Rivers, and Roethlisberger. On the one hand, TD could have paid the hefty price needed to trade up for one of the big three. On the other, he could have taken a QB with low draft pick so that even a bust wouldn't set the franchise back very much. Instead he took a middle road: the Losman pick was valuable enough that the franchise will get hurt if he fails, but it wasn't high enough to give the same chance to resolve the uncertainty at QB that a top 3 QB would have had. Making the situation worse is the fact that TD laid the foundation for a QB controversy before the season even started. At present, the franchise won't commit to Holcomb because Losman is a first round pick. Nor will it commit to Losman, because Holcomb is playing better. The predictable result of this situation TD has created is the same merry-go-round we had back in the Flutie/Johnson days. 3. TD's neglect of the offensive line. The two most effective methods of building an offensive line are to use high draft picks, or to install an unusual system/philosophy which allows you to have success with a different type of offensive lineman than most other teams are looking for. A good example of this second method is teams like Denver and Atlanta looking for smaller, more athletic linemen. NE has had success building a line with late-round picks, apparently because it values intelligence and toughness more than athleticism. TD has failed to build a line through either of the two methods. No TD pick chosen after round 3 has become a permanent starter on the Bills' line. As for using high draft picks, TD has had a total of 15 first-day draft picks in his tenure with the Bills. Of those 15, two have been used on the offensive line. That's 13% of his first-day picks. Yet five out of 22, or 23%, of a team's starters are offensive linemen. Based on TD's actions in the first day of the draft, filling a position on the offensive line is only about half as important as an average starting position. Making the problem worse is the fact that TD allowed Jonas Jennings to leave via free agency. In TD's fifth year, there is only one starter on the o-line obtained via the draft. The Peerless Price move was a good move, an example of TD making another team's irrational love for one of your players work for you instead of against you. He should have done the same thing the next year with Antoine Winfield. While TD has had his share of successes as well as failures, he has failed to set a strong overall direction for the team. In retrospect, A.J. Smith would have been a much better hire.
plenzmd1 Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Below is a list of what I would consider TD's avoidable mistakes: While TD has had his share of successes as well as failures, he has failed to set a strong overall direction for the team. In retrospect, A.J. Smith would have been a much better hire. 496931[/snapback] Was he even considered, or was the relationship between Wilson and Butler so bad, and with he and Butler being boys, that he was going with Butler no matter what?
AJ1 Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Below is a list of what I would consider TD's avoidable mistakes: 1. The final four candidates for 2001's head coach position. During the Wade Phillips era, the defensive scheme was excellent, the players always came to play, and the defense seemed to be at its best when the stakes were highest. His coaching problems were on offense and special teams. Clearly, what was needed was a coach who could fix the offensive coaching problems while leaving the defense alone, much as Gruden did for Tampa Bay. Instead, the final four candidates for the head coaching job were all from the defensive side of the ball. Gregg Williams' tenure resulted in a decrease in the quality of defensive coaching, while doing nothing to solve the offensive coaching problems. 2. TD's treatment of the QB position. At the time it was made, the Bledsoe trade was clearly a mistake. The man in the best position to evaluate Bledsoe--Bill Belichick--wouldn't have traded him to a division rival if he'd thought Bledsoe still had the potential for greatness. Arguably the biggest difference between Brady and Bledsoe is how much more quickly Brady scans the field. TD had to know Bledsoe would read the field even more slowly over time, and this problem would be made worse by Buffalo's problems with the offensive line. Many or most experts felt the 2004 draft had a big three when it came to QBs: Manning, Rivers, and Roethlisberger. On the one hand, TD could have paid the hefty price needed to trade up for one of the big three. On the other, he could have taken a QB with low draft pick so that even a bust wouldn't set the franchise back very much. Instead he took a middle road: the Losman pick was valuable enough that the franchise will get hurt if he fails, but it wasn't high enough to give the same chance to resolve the uncertainty at QB that a top 3 QB would have had. Making the situation worse is the fact that TD laid the foundation for a QB controversy before the season even started. At present, the franchise won't commit to Holcomb because Losman is a first round pick. Nor will it commit to Losman, because Holcomb is playing better. The predictable result of this situation TD has created is the same merry-go-round we had back in the Flutie/Johnson days. 3. TD's neglect of the offensive line. The two most effective methods of building an offensive line are to use high draft picks, or to install an unusual system/philosophy which allows you to have success with a different type of offensive lineman than most other teams are looking for. A good example of this second method is teams like Denver and Atlanta looking for smaller, more athletic linemen. NE has had success building a line with late-round picks, apparently because it values intelligence and toughness more than athleticism. TD has failed to build a line through either of the two methods. No TD pick chosen after round 3 has become a permanent starter on the Bills' line. As for using high draft picks, TD has had a total of 15 first-day draft picks in his tenure with the Bills. Of those 15, two have been used on the offensive line. That's 13% of his first-day picks. Yet five out of 22, or 23%, of a team's starters are offensive linemen. Based on TD's actions in the first day of the draft, filling a position on the offensive line is only about half as important as an average starting position. Making the problem worse is the fact that TD allowed Jonas Jennings to leave via free agency. In TD's fifth year, there is only one starter on the o-line obtained via the draft. The Peerless Price move was a good move, an example of TD making another team's irrational love for one of your players work for you instead of against you. He should have done the same thing the next year with Antoine Winfield. While TD has had his share of successes as well as failures, he has failed to set a strong overall direction for the team. In retrospect, A.J. Smith would have been a much better hire. 496931[/snapback] You could sum all this up by saying Donahoe is not capable of seeing the big picture.....A fatal flaw for the GM position.
Orton's Arm Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Was he even considered, or was the relationship between Wilson and Butler so bad, and with he and Butler being boys, that he was going with Butler no matter what? 496938[/snapback] Based on media reports at the time, TD was the only candidate considered.
JDG Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 I don't think anyone is holding Donahoe to the standard of brining back the four Super Bowls and six straight playoff births of the Glory Years. What we would like to see, however, is a team that is consistently playing meaningful football games in December - ala a Pittsburgh. This is Year 5 of the Donahoe era, and the playoffs still seem like grounds for criticism. In my mind there are two possible criticisms of Donahoe: 1) Donahoe changes his mind too much, pulls the trigger too quickly, and never lets things get built. Prima facie evidence of this is that the Bills last one in Foxboro in 2000 - just five years ago, and only *one* player is still with the Bills from that team. Just *one*! (Eric Moulds) Football is a *team* game, and no wonder a team has not been built with that kind of turnover. Also, Donahoe probably had a heavy hand in firing offensive coordinator Mike Sheppherd after just one talent-starved 3-13 year. By the same token, Donahoe has spent a whopping *eight* 1st and 2nd round draft picks on the QB, RB, and WR positions alone in the space of just five years. A staggering investment. 2) Donahoe utterly blew his first building project, centered around Gregg Williams, Drew Bledsoe, Travis Henry, Eric Moulds and Josh Reed. He's now ripped that failure out almost completely, bringing in Mularkey, Losman, McGahee, Evans, and Parrish - while retaining only Moulds (and Josh Reed as a bit-player, special-teamer.) Given the depth to which Buffalo is into the second Donahoe project, it seems that Donahoe can probably not be properly judged until the project reaches its culmination over the rest of this year and next. If it turns out anything like the first project, however, well then Donahoe surely knows that there aren't many third chances in the National Football League. As many of you may guess, I actually probably lean towards the second criticism rather than the first, but there is a case to be made for the first. In either case, the criticism has to be accepted as more than legitimate. It takes a lot of luck to win a Super Bowl, but a lot of skill can usually produce at least the playoffs - or at least a season with meaningful December football games. So far, that skill has not yet been conclusively demonstrated in Buffalo. JDG
Dawgg Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 There was no way AJ Smith was going to take the job. He and Butler were extremely close. In fact, upon Butler's dismissal, AJ Smith ripped the organization. It was already a forgone conclusion that AJ Smith would be gone. The cookie-cutter argument here is that Butler left this team in a salary cap mess -- an assessment I think has been largely over-exaggerated. These same people argue that Donahoe has put the Bills in a good cap situation. Where has it gotten the team? Nowhere near the Wade Philips - John Butler era. Based on media reports at the time, TD was the only candidate considered. 496945[/snapback]
Simon Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Why do people think this team was a complete mess when TD took over? Well here's one big reason: 1 26 26 Erik Flowers DE Arizona State 2 27 58 Travares Tillman DB Georgia Tech 3 27 89 Corey Moore LB Virginia Tech 4 27 121 Avion Black WR Tennessee State 5 27 156 Sammy Morris RB Texas Tech 6 28 194 Leif Larsen DE Texas-El Paso 7 27 233 Drew Haddad WR Buffalo 7 45 251 DaShon Polk LB Arizona 1999 Round Pick Overall Name Position School 1 23 23 Antoine Winfield DB Ohio State 2 22 53 Peerless Price WR Tennessee 3 25 86 Shawn Bryson RB Tennessee 4 24 119 Keith Newman LB North Carolina 4 27 122 Bobby Collins TE North Alabama 5 23 156 Jay Foreman LB Nebraska 6 15 184 Rashard Cook DB USC 6 25 194 Armon Hatcher DB Oregon State 7 24 230 Sheldon Jackson TE Nebraska 7 42 248 Bryce Fisher DE Air Force 1998 Round Pick Overall Name Position School 2 9 39 Sam Cowart LB Florida State 3 7 68 Robert Hicks OT Mississippi State 5 8 131 Jonathan Linton RB North Carolina 6 7 160 Fred Coleman WR Washington 7 9 198 Victor Allotey OG Indiana 7 49 238 Kamil Loud WR Cal Poly San Luis Obispo 1997 Round Pick Overall Name Position School 1 23 23 Antowain Smith RB Houston 2 22 52 Marcellus Wiley DE Columbia 4 24 120 Jamie Nails OT Florida A&M 5 23 153 Sean Woodson DB Jackson State 6 22 185 Marcus Spriggs OG Houston 7 25 226 Pat Fitzgerald TE Texas 1996 Round Pick Overall Name Position School 1 24 24 Eric Moulds WR Mississippi State 2 23 53 Gabe Northern DE LSU 3 26 87 Matt Stevens DB Appalachian State 4 25 120 Sean Moran DE Colorado State 5 24 156 Ray Jackson DB Colorado State 6 29 196 Leon Neal RB Washington 6 35 202 Dusty Ziegler C Notre Dame 7 28 237 Dan Bradenburg DE Indiana State 7 35 244 Jay Riemersma TE Michigan 7 40 249 Eric Smedley DB Indiana Those are Butler/Smith's last 5 drafts; a true horror show. The Bills were devoid of young talent and relying on an aging roster stocked with overpaid players just to keep their heads above water. John Butler may have been a nice guy but I wasn't sorry to se him move on as he'd done a horrible job of stocking the Bill's cupboards.
plenzmd1 Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Well here's one big reason: 1 26 26 Erik Flowers DE Arizona State 2 27 58 Travares Tillman DB Georgia Tech 3 27 89 Corey Moore LB Virginia Tech 4 27 121 Avion Black WR Tennessee State 5 27 156 Sammy Morris RB Texas Tech 6 28 194 Leif Larsen DE Texas-El Paso 7 27 233 Drew Haddad WR Buffalo 7 45 251 DaShon Polk LB Arizona 1999 Round Pick Overall Name Position School 1 23 23 Antoine Winfield DB Ohio State 2 22 53 Peerless Price WR Tennessee 3 25 86 Shawn Bryson RB Tennessee 4 24 119 Keith Newman LB North Carolina 4 27 122 Bobby Collins TE North Alabama 5 23 156 Jay Foreman LB Nebraska 6 15 184 Rashard Cook DB USC 6 25 194 Armon Hatcher DB Oregon State 7 24 230 Sheldon Jackson TE Nebraska 7 42 248 Bryce Fisher DE Air Force 1998 Round Pick Overall Name Position School 2 9 39 Sam Cowart LB Florida State 3 7 68 Robert Hicks OT Mississippi State 5 8 131 Jonathan Linton RB North Carolina 6 7 160 Fred Coleman WR Washington 7 9 198 Victor Allotey OG Indiana 7 49 238 Kamil Loud WR Cal Poly San Luis Obispo 1997 Round Pick Overall Name Position School 1 23 23 Antowain Smith RB Houston 2 22 52 Marcellus Wiley DE Columbia 4 24 120 Jamie Nails OT Florida A&M 5 23 153 Sean Woodson DB Jackson State 6 22 185 Marcus Spriggs OG Houston 7 25 226 Pat Fitzgerald TE Texas 1996 Round Pick Overall Name Position School 1 24 24 Eric Moulds WR Mississippi State 2 23 53 Gabe Northern DE LSU 3 26 87 Matt Stevens DB Appalachian State 4 25 120 Sean Moran DE Colorado State 5 24 156 Ray Jackson DB Colorado State 6 29 196 Leon Neal RB Washington 6 35 202 Dusty Ziegler C Notre Dame 7 28 237 Dan Bradenburg DE Indiana State 7 35 244 Jay Riemersma TE Michigan 7 40 249 Eric Smedley DB Indiana Those are Butler/Smith's last 5 drafts; a true horror show. The Bills were devoid of young talent and relying on an aging roster stocked with overpaid players just to keep their heads above water. John Butler may have been a nice guy but I wasn't sorry to se him move on as he'd done a horrible job of stocking the Bill's cupboards. 496966[/snapback] Simon, I really do not think those drafts were bad. Granted, the Eric Flowers pick was a stretch, but I see a bunch of guys from those drafts still playing at a fairly high level around the league. All i was saying is we were so used to going to the playoffs, we miss one year, Butler gets in a pissing match with Wilson, Wilson by all accounts wants him to stay but he refuses to negotiate and then Wilson fires him. In comes TD, and all of a sudden Butler has done such a piss poor job we are dead in the water. TD gets to blow the whole thing up, with no where to go but up. I'm just saying the year before, we lose three starters in one drive agaisn't the Bucs, if we win we are in the drivers seat for the playoffs. Mind you pretty much the same team that everyone here claims would ahgve gone to the Superbowl if not for a little forward pass on a kickoff return. But at the end of the next year, when siad GM is fired, we are in slary cap hell. I just never bought the argument
Kipers Hair Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 You know I love Mr T and all - but there is ample reason to suggest that TD is not fit to be a GM in the league any more. I get it that the team was a mess, but that was how long ago? I look at other teams in the same baot...and I see them as playopff contenders now. We are now relegated to the ranks of the AZ Cardinals and Detroit Lions...expected to lose year in and year out. The good teams reload and we are seemingly always rebuilding. And the coaching choices - yes Gregg was a bad move, but Malarky is perhaps worse. On this point, I think TD is most damaged, the Pittsburgh experience has caused him to avoid strong coaching candidates...which ultimately will prevent the Bills from being a good team....
Orton's Arm Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Those are Butler/Smith's last 5 drafts; a true horror show. The Bills were devoid of young talent and relying on an aging roster stocked with overpaid players just to keep their heads above water. John Butler may have been a nice guy but I wasn't sorry to se him move on as he'd done a horrible job of stocking the Bill's cupboards. 496966[/snapback] What stands out about those drafts is that only one first-day pick was used on the o-line: Robert Hicks. Not only were Butler and TD alike in their neglect of the o-line, but their successes seem similar too. TD's main drafting successes: - Willis McGahee - Nate Clements - Terrence McGee - Lee Evans (based on his rookie year only) - Aaron Schoebel Butler's main drafting successes in his last five years here: - Antoine Winfield - Peerless Price (based on the Atlanta trade) - Sam Cowart - Eric Moulds - Jay Riemersma Both GMs had some success at finding good non-QB offensive skill position players, with an occassional good player thrown in on defense. So far, the uncertainty at the QB position is still unsolved, as are the problems with the offensive line.
Simon Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Simon, I really do not think those drafts were bad......I see a bunch of guys from those drafts still playing at a fairly high level around the league. But at the end of the next year, when siad GM is fired, we are in slary cap hell. I just never bought the argument 496981[/snapback] Those drafts are atrocious. In 5 years he managed to stock the Bills with a grand total of 2 good young players(Moulds, Winfield). Even if you add the injury-prone Cowart that's still only 3 good players. In 5 years. The rest of those picks are just garbage. Look at his 2nd/3rd rounders. Gabe Northern, Matt Stevens, Marcellus Wiley, Robert Hicks, Peerless Price, Shawn Bryson, Travares Tillman and Corey Moore. That's just brutal. Don't even look at his Day2 picks, they're just too horrifying. In the salary cap era, your draft is the cornerstone of your team. W/o a good draft you'll never have good young talent at a reasonable salary and you'll drown yourself trying to live off expensive FA's or overpaid veterans (Reed, Smith, Thomas, SRogers, Holocek, Fina, Hansen, RBrown, HJones, Panos, Ostroski, etc.) This team was going nowhere but backwards with that sort of foundation of a roster. Donahoe had to decide whether to bleed the flotsam out slowly and try to remain competitive while he was doing it, or whether to get it over with in one fell swoop and start building a team with a foundation of good young talent. He chose the latter and I applauded him for it at the time and still do. Instead of looking at a team in serious trouble like he was doing when he got here, he's now looking at a team with a solid nucleus of young talent that only needs a few tweaks to be a playoff contender, and he has the cap space to make those changes. This team is in waaaaayyyyyy better shape than it was when he got here and wishing for the return of John Butler is absolutely mind-boggling to me.
Bill from NYC Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 And the coaching choices - yes Gregg was a bad move, but Malarky is perhaps worse. 496996[/snapback] I just don't see why you feel this way. MM was 9-7 as a rookie. In 05, his second year, his team lost a player who might have been (let's hope that he heals) a Hall of Fame Linebacker to injury. His boss tanked the draft, dumped his starting qb, and replaced him with a rookie who doesn't (at least not yet) seem to have a clue. His run stuffing DT left as a ufa. The left OG that his boss brought in is am utter disgrace. Despite the above, MM has his team at 3-5 and as of now, in contention. Imo, MM is just not the person who is bringing our beloved Bills down. Keep watching. I am sure that MM is going to be a fine coach in this football league. Jmo.
Bill from NYC Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 This team is in waaaaayyyyyy better shape than it was when he got here and wishing for the return of John Butler is absolutely mind-boggling to me. 497001[/snapback] No argument here. Overall, TD is pretty good at cap management. He has however been not so stellar on draft day. As a matter of fact, I would rate his overall draft record (with the Bills) as sub-par. How about you?
Orton's Arm Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Instead of looking at a team in serious trouble like he was doing when he got here, he's now looking at a team with a solid nucleus of young talent that only needs a few tweaks to be a playoff contender, and he has the cap space to make those changes. 497001[/snapback] While I largely agree with your assessment of Butler, I'm not as optimistic about TD's performance as you are. Other than Aaron Schoebel--a player who is a little above average for a starter--there isn't a solid nucleus of young talent on the defensive line. Nor is there much of a foundation at linebacker, except for another decent player in Angelo Crowell. The CB and FS positions are somewhat promising, even if Clements leaves in free agency. But there is nothing in the pipeline at SS. The young talent on the offensive line consists of Duke Preston and Mike Williams--nothing more. Mike Williams is this year's Jonas Jennings--overpaid for the amount of time he's actually on the field. At QB, Losman is largely an unknown, and ultimately may turn out to be a bust. The same is true of this year's picks at WR and TE. Willis McGahee is an excellent player, and I still have high hopes for Evans. Euhus may turn out to be a decent player. But ultimately TD's drafts have left too many holes in the roster, and these holes are being filled with declining players like Lawyer Milloy, Sam Adams, London Fletcher, Troy Vincent, Trey Teague, or Chris Villarreal. Further, stopgap players like Gandy and Anderson have been used to make up for a lack of good o-line picks.
DeeRay Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 wishing for the return of John Butler is absolutely mind-boggling to me me too. only Jesus Christ and Tedy Brushi resurrected.
Rico Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Instead of looking at a team in serious trouble like he was doing when he got here, he's now looking at a team with a solid nucleus of young talent that only needs a few tweaks to be a playoff contender, and he has the cap space to make those changes. 497001[/snapback] I also thought we were a few tweaks away before this season started... now, I'm not sure. Too many key players got old in a hurry, and too many younger players have yet to step up. I remember the thread from last year asking what other teams' roster in the NFL would you trade the Bills roster for straight up. Back then, I could only come up with a handful. But now, unless I see some significant upward changes the 2nd half, I'd trade this roster for at least 10-12 other teams' roster, maybe more.
TC in St. Louis Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 I like Tom Donahoe. It's been rough being a fan the past few years, but at least we had some feeling of optimism at the end of last year. He took some calculated risks at the end of the year, letting Jennings and Williams go. I agreed with him there, I don't think Jennings is worth that kind of dough, although Williams' deal seemed affordable. Obviously, he felt that it was time for Edwards and his draft choices to fill Williams' spot. I think that might have worked, had Spikes not been injured. Mike Williams' health has had a major effect on the line. Had MW played even close to his potential, nobody would question TD's selecting him so early in the draft. McGee has been a great player, considering where he was chosen. McGahee was also a major steal. Jury is still out on Losman. Maybe he will pan out. Evans is suffering the sophomore slump, and nobody seems to be able to get him the ball. Fletcher was a great pickup at LB. Posey has never impressed me. I think we would've been better off keeping Jay Foreman. A position that continues to frustrate me is TE....when will we ever get us a tight end who can contribute to this offense? Overall, I'm satisfied with Tom Donahoe's work with the team. He's a lot smarter than I when it comes to football. Injuries are part of the game, to be sure. They are not an excuse. However, losing Takeo Spikes for the year probably added 25 yards per game to the defensive statistics. Much like having JP as QB subtracted 50 ypg from the offense. Put those together and you've got problems.
JDG Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Simon, I agree that the 2000 draft was an unmitigated disaster, but I think that you are being just a little too hard on Butler. In particular, I think that the 1999 and 1996 drafts were good, and 1997 was probably fine as well. To make my point, lets consider 1999: 1999 Round Pick Overall Name Position School 1 23 23 Antoine Winfield - Near Pro Bowl performer 2 22 53 Peerless Price - One Near Pro Bowl season, solid NFL player for several other seasons 3 25 86 Shawn Bryson RB - Solid NFL Role Player 4 24 119 Keith Newman LB - Solid NFL Player 4 27 122 Bobby Collins TE - Marginal NFL Player 5 23 156 Jay Foreman LB - Solid NFL Player 6 15 184 Rashard Cook DB - Bust 6 25 194 Armon Hatcher DB - Bust 7 24 230 Sheldon Jackson TE - Marginal NFL Player 7 42 248 Bryce Fisher DE - Solid NFL Player I tried to look up the 1998-1999-2000 drafts of some NFL teams that went on to success in the early-2000's. Here's the Packers for example: 2000 1 1 14 14 Bubba Franks TE Miami (FL) 2 2 13 44 Chad Clifton T Tennessee 3 3 12 74 Steve Warren DT Nebraska 4 4 4 98 Na'il Diggs LB Ohio State 5 4 20 114 Anthony Lucas WR Arkansas 6 4 32 126 Gary Berry DB Ohio State 7 5 20 149 Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila LB San Diego State 8 5 22 151 Joey Jamison WR Texas Southern 9 7 18 224 Mark Tauscher G Wisconsin 10 7 23 229 Ron Moore DT NW Oklahoma State 11 7 36 242 Charles Lee WR Central Florida 12 7 43 249 Eugene McCaslin LB Florida 13 7 46 252 Rondell Mealey RB Louisiana State 1999 1 1 25 25 Antwan Edwards DB Clemson 2 2 16 47 Fred Vinson DB Vanderbilt 3 3 26 87 Mike McKenzie DB Memphis 4 3 33 94 Cletidus Hunt DT Kentucky State 5 4 36 131 Aaron Brooks QB Virginia 6 4 38 133 Josh Bidwell P Oregon 7 5 26 159 DeMond Parker RB Oklahoma 8 5 30 163 Craig Heimburger C Missouri 9 6 27 196 Dee Miller WR Ohio State 10 6 34 203 Scott Curry G Montana 11 7 6 212 Chris Akins DB Arkansas-Pine Bluff 12 7 7 213 Donald Driver WR Alcorn State 1998 1 1 19 19 Vonnie Holliday DT North Carolina 2 3 29 90 Jonathan Brown DE Tennessee 3 4 29 121 Roosevelt Blackmon DB Morris Brown 4 5 27 150 Corey Bradford WR Jackson State 5 6 3 156 Scott McGarrahan DB New Mexico 6 6 34 187 Matt Hasselbeck QB Boston College 7 7 29 218 Edwin Watson RB Purdue The record looks fairly comparable to me. Here's New Bruschi (We're not worthy!), which obviously hit the mother-of-all-home-runs with Tom Brady, but the rest of their drafts look awful pedestrian: 2000 1 2 15 46 Adrian Klemm T Hawaii 2 3 14 76 J.R. Redmond RB Arizona State 3 4 33 127 Greg Robinson-Randall T Michigan State 4 5 12 141 Dave Stachelski TE Boise State 5 5 32 161 Jeff Marriott DT Missouri 6 6 21 187 Antwan Harris DB Virginia 7 6 33 199 Tom Brady QB Michigan 8 6 35 201 David Nugent DT Purdue 9 7 20 226 Casey Tisdale LB New Mexico 10 7 33 239 Patrick Pass RB Georgia 1999 1 1 17 17 Damien Woody C Boston College 2 1 28 28 Andy Katzenmoyer LB Ohio State 3 2 15 46 Kevin Faulk RB Louisiana State 4 3 30 91 Tony George DB Florida 5 5 21 154 Derrick Fletcher T Baylor 6 6 11 180 Marcus Washington DB Colorado 7 7 21 227 Michael Bishop QB Kansas State 8 7 35 241 Sean Morey WR Brown 1998 1 1 18 18 Robert Edwards RB Georgia 2 1 22 22 Tebucky Jones DB Syracuse 3 2 22 52 Tony Simmons WR Wisconsin 4 2 24 54 Rod Rutledge TE Alabama 5 3 20 81 Chris Floyd RB Michigan 6 3 22 83 Greg Spires DE Florida State 7 4 23 115 Leonta Rheams DT Houston 8 5 22 145 Ron Merkerson LB Colorado 9 6 23 176 Harold Shaw RB Southern Mississippi 10 7 22 211 Jason Andersen C Brigham Young And if the Patriots were drafting geniuses, would they really have taken Dave Stachelski ahead of Tom Brady???? JDG
Dr. K Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 1999 Round Pick Overall Name Position School 1 23 23 Antoine Winfield - Near Pro Bowl performer 2 22 53 Peerless Price - One Near Pro Bowl season, solid NFL player for several other seasons JDG 497116[/snapback] Hey, JDG--I think you slipped up here. Peerless Price was not drafted in 1999 by Butler. He was drafted by Donohoe a couple of years later. Do you mean Pierson Priealou? (sp?)
GG Posted November 7, 2005 Posted November 7, 2005 Hey, JDG--I think you slipped up here. Peerless Price was not drafted in 1999 by Butler. He was drafted by Donohoe a couple of years later. Do you mean Pierson Priealou? (sp?) 497120[/snapback] Actually he was drafted by Butler in '99. Prioleau was a FA signing from SF.
Recommended Posts