gggbills Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 You all know what I am talking about, was that a catch by the Pats on that second TD drive....you know, the one that the refs so-called reviewed. I was in a bar that was half filled with Pats fans, and even they did not think the guy caught the ball. What's say you all.....catch or not?
mackey7789 Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 You all know what I am talking about, was that a catch by the Pats on that second TD drive....you know, the one that the refs so-called reviewed. I was in a bar that was half filled with Pats fans, and even they did not think the guy caught the ball. What's say you all.....catch or not? 490840[/snapback] No, it was not a catch. None of the announcers thought it was a catch either. What a joke.
billsfanone Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 I thougt it was close. I knew it wouldn't be overturned though.
WILLIS Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 !@#$ no it wasn't a catch! even some blind folk could see that sh--! !@#$ it!
justnzane Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 and the one after that wasn't a catch either. the refs really f***ed the bills over in the 4th qrtr, the moulds push off was a very weak call.
WILLIS Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 and the one after that wasn't a catch either. the refs really f***ed the bills over in the 4th qrtr, the moulds push off was a very weak call. 490914[/snapback] YES...MOST OF THE BILLS PENALTIES WERE WEAK CALLS...sigh
Fezmid Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 and the one after that wasn't a catch either. the refs really f***ed the bills over in the 4th qrtr, the moulds push off was a very weak call. 490914[/snapback] Not to mention the missed no-call against the Pats when the hit #92 in the back on a play. He even got up and said, "What the hell, ref?!" Definately seemed like the refs were out to help the Pats in the 4th. Still, we should've scored some points in the first three quarters. CW
Kevbeau Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 and the one after that wasn't a catch either. the refs really f***ed the bills over in the 4th qrtr, the moulds push off was a very weak call. 490914[/snapback] Macguire started to say that you don't call a weak OPI call that late in a close game, but quickly hushed up and started to sing a different tune.
justnzane Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 Not to mention the missed no-call against the Pats when the hit #92 in the back on a play. He even got up and said, "What the hell, ref?!" Definately seemed like the refs were out to help the Pats in the 4th. Still, we should've scored some points in the first three quarters. CW 490928[/snapback] yeah it is a shame that the bills played better than the pats and still lost. the pats stole that game.
Spiderweb Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 The call on Moulds, the catch that wasn't....yeah both were huge, game breakers they were.
Adam Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 You all know what I am talking about, was that a catch by the Pats on that second TD drive....you know, the one that the refs so-called reviewed. I was in a bar that was half filled with Pats fans, and even they did not think the guy caught the ball. What's say you all.....catch or not? 490840[/snapback] Don't worry about it too much- just enjoy the fact that we had the "chamnps" on the ropes, and they are going down the drain
gggbills Posted October 31, 2005 Author Posted October 31, 2005 !@#$ no it wasn't a catch! even some blind folk could see that sh--! !@#$ it! 490872[/snapback] Thank you, I was drinking so I thought I might have been wrong. I am SOO tired of the Pats getting those kind of calls. What would the papers in the morning have been writing if we had beaten them? Bills beat Pats and Tedy....instead, they can now write their made for TV movie story. We got Fuc@, again, by a ref, in Pats land. It is hard for me to even respect a team like that when we get so clearly screwed that way. I know Pats Trolls will think I am whinning, but I really do not care. In a game that close where the Pats are having trouble moving the ball, you simple can not F-up a call that is SOOOOO clear to anyone that can see out of half of one eye. Sad, very sad day for the Bills. Many people thought that we would be killed tonite. It is so sad to actually put up a great fight only to have some moron of a ref give the game to the Pats. I cannot tell you how bad I feel about this game tonite.
sven233 Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 unless they changed the rule that the ball can't move after hitting the ground, then NO, it wasn NOT a catch....... On top of that, the rest of the Refs calls were terrible. With the announcing Pats lovefest, and the terrible refs calls.....this might be the most discusting game I ever had to watch......
kasper13 Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 Just the latest in a long line of screw jobs against the Bills vs. the Patriots. Close games against NE, we have to beat the Patriots and the Refs.
radio dude Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 Not as disgusting as the Bills having a 16-7 lead and not having the testosterone to salt it away...maybe a lack of heart, unlike the abundance of it brought by Bruschi!
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 You all know what I am talking about, was that a catch by the Pats on that second TD drive....you know, the one that the refs so-called reviewed. I was in a bar that was half filled with Pats fans, and even they did not think the guy caught the ball. What's say you all.....catch or not? 490840[/snapback] No it was not. If you look closely at the review, you see the end of the ball hit the ground, and the ball's knocked loose, completely out of his arm, and he falls on it. By the NFL's own rule, even if he had possession going down, he did not complete the requisite "football action" to make it possession and a catch (which, by the way, is a terminally stupid rule). Problem is...it was very tough to see. Rather subtle, and partially blocked by his arm. It was conclusive IF you saw it...but it was easy to miss, particularly on a time limit (took me more than 90 seconds to see it). Guess the ref just missed it. C'est la guerre.
BB2004 Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 Thank you, I was drinking so I thought I might have been wrong. I am SOO tired of the Pats getting those kind of calls. What would the papers in the morning have been writing if we had beaten them? Bills beat Pats and Tedy....instead, they can now write their made for TV movie story. We got Fuc@, again, by a ref, in Pats land. It is hard for me to even respect a team like that when we get so clearly screwed that way. I know Pats Trolls will think I am whinning, but I really do not care. In a game that close where the Pats are having trouble moving the ball, you simple can not F-up a call that is SOOOOO clear to anyone that can see out of half of one eye. Sad, very sad day for the Bills. Many people thought that we would be killed tonite. It is so sad to actually put up a great fight only to have some moron of a ref give the game to the Pats. I cannot tell you how bad I feel about this game tonite. 490953[/snapback] Lets be realistic. We collapsed down the stretch after the 2nd booth review. Our offensive line had a better game but NOT their pass blocking. Truthfully I didn't think we played that well to begin with. I felt like we were matching the Patriots intensity in the first half. When we got up to a 9 point lead in the fourth after we couldn't move the ball, I thought that we blew two opportunites to seperate ourselves from NE.
BILLS4LIFE Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 Hell no it wasnt. Even the stupid announcers knew it wasnt. Not enough evidence? WTH are they looking at???
TC in St. Louis Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 how come they only have one camera angle when reviewing calls against the patriots, yet every other challenge in the league has at least 5 different angles on the play? That was not a catch, even from that crappy angle. and i don't believe that was the only camera on the play at that time, especially on a nationally televised game.
Ramius Posted October 31, 2005 Posted October 31, 2005 how come they only have one camera angle when reviewing calls against the patriots, yet every other challenge in the league has at least 5 different angles on the play? That was not a catch, even from that crappy angle. and i don't believe that was the only camera on the play at that time, especially on a nationally televised game. 491173[/snapback] where was their damn sky cam that they masterbate over the entire pregame? oh thats right, it would have showed an incomplete pass, we cant have the pats lsoe in the brushi comeback game...
Recommended Posts