jahnyc Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 Can we afford McGee's new deal and a top market deal for Clements? I hope so, but I have my doubts that the team will do it. I have a feeling the plan is to trade Clements (if franchised) and try to pick up a cb in the draft with one of our early picks. I believe that the salary cap will be significantly higher next year, but I doubt that will matter in this situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch19079 Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 lol, that was i read on KFFl... i can see it happneing. i can also see us franchising him and signing him to a lng term deal. i do NOT want McGee to be our #1 CB. but i think we can afford both. McGee's deal was not that much. and if you dont resign clements, than who would you resign?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 lol, that was i read on KFFl... i can see it happneing. i can also see us franchising him and signing him to a lng term deal. i do NOT want McGee to be our #1 CB. but i think we can afford both. McGee's deal was not that much. and if you dont resign clements, than who would you resign?? 489044[/snapback] Having a great CB and no pass rush, you'll get burned either way... if we sacrifice Nate to boost up our OL and DL, then so be it, we'll be a better team overall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch19079 Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 Having a great CB and no pass rush, you'll get burned either way... if we sacrifice Nate to boost up our OL and DL, then so be it, we'll be a better team overall 489050[/snapback] and who will be out #1 CB? a high paid FA? cus thomas and greer can NOT be that shut down CB we need on D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts