RuntheDamnBall Posted October 25, 2005 Posted October 25, 2005 Your tax dollars used to stop Onion from using Presidential seal...
Campy Posted October 25, 2005 Posted October 25, 2005 Your tax dollars used to stop Onion from using Presidential seal... 485960[/snapback] I'm not quite as concerned with the $9 spent on a certified letter as I am the the $1829 per household spent in Iraq. That said, it is pretty dumb that they'd invest more than 12 seconds discussing The Onion in the White House.
Kelly the Dog Posted October 25, 2005 Posted October 25, 2005 Your tax dollars used to stop Onion from using Presidential seal... 485960[/snapback] "It is inconceivable that anyone would think that, by using the seal, The Onion intends to 'convey... sponsorship or approval' by the president," wrote Rochelle H. Klaskin, the paper's lawyer, who went on to note that a headline in the current issue made the point: "Bush to Appoint Someone to Be in Charge of Country."
RuntheDamnBall Posted October 25, 2005 Author Posted October 25, 2005 I'm not quite as concerned with the $9 spent on a certified letter as I am the the $1829 per household spent in Iraq. That said, it is pretty dumb that they'd invest more than 12 seconds discussing The Onion in the White House. 485973[/snapback] Hey, adds up. They spent time getting paid to come up with this idea, probably went through a few people's desks for approval.
Kelly the Dog Posted October 25, 2005 Posted October 25, 2005 Maybe they should just use this one instead. presidential seal
Kevbeau Posted October 25, 2005 Posted October 25, 2005 Maybe they should just use this one instead. presidential seal 485984[/snapback]
stuckincincy Posted October 25, 2005 Posted October 25, 2005 IIRC the use of the Seal came up during Clinton's tenure. The potential user was "convinced" not to do so.
Recommended Posts