ganesh Posted October 18, 2005 Posted October 18, 2005 Adams is out for the year....Sacks and Bledsoe might soone be getting reunited..... Adams was a pro-bowl left tackle....With Julius Jones also missing games due to injury and his kind of go to guy Crayton also out for a month with a high ankle sprain, Bledsoe will be throwing to Glenn, Keyshawn and Price.
Kevbeau Posted October 18, 2005 Posted October 18, 2005 Glenn's having a good year, but that offense revolves around Julius Jones. Their running game struggled the past week and with a high ankle sparain, Jones may not be back for a few weeks. Now with Adams being out, we'll see if Drew can carry the Boys.
Fezmid Posted October 18, 2005 Posted October 18, 2005 Now with Adams being out, we'll see if Drew can carry the Boys. 479198[/snapback] He did carry them last week (despite the defense trying to give it away - although the defense helped carry for the first 3 quarters) against the 3-1 Giants. Then again, that was at home so time will tell. Any team losing their LT (pro-bowl quality or not) is going to suffer. CW
RuntheDamnBall Posted October 18, 2005 Posted October 18, 2005 He did carry them last week (despite the defense trying to give it away - although the defense helped carry for the first 3 quarters) against the 3-1 Giants. Then again, that was at home so time will tell. Any team losing their LT (pro-bowl quality or not) is going to suffer. CW 479461[/snapback] C'mon Fez, Bledsoe had as much of a hand in almost giving it away with an INT and 2 fumbles.
Fezmid Posted October 18, 2005 Posted October 18, 2005 C'mon Fez, Bledsoe had as much of a hand in almost giving it away with an INT and 2 fumbles. 479466[/snapback] The doublestandards around here are amazing. In crunch time, Bledsoe leads the team down for the winning FG, yet gets no credit. However when he FAILS in crunch time, regardless of how he plays the rest of the game, it's said that he can't win when there's pressure on him. CW
RuntheDamnBall Posted October 18, 2005 Posted October 18, 2005 The doublestandards around here are amazing. In crunch time, Bledsoe leads the team down for the winning FG, yet gets no credit. However when he FAILS in crunch time, regardless of how he plays the rest of the game, it's said that he can't win when there's pressure on him. CW 479580[/snapback] Hey, he won the game. Good for him. I'm just saying that's no reason to not be critical of him and THEN be critical of a defense that gave up only 13 pts. Talk about double-standards!
Fezmid Posted October 18, 2005 Posted October 18, 2005 Hey, he won the game. Good for him. I'm just saying that's no reason to not be critical of him and THEN be critical of a defense that gave up only 13 pts. Talk about double-standards! 479582[/snapback] You mean like people here are critical of a defense that only gave up 13 points against the Jags last year...? Or a defense that only gave up 17 points against the Jets this week...? Or a defense that only gave up 19 points to both the Bucs and Saints...? Oh, that's different, it's Buffalo - we're allowed to be critical of our own team (in fact, this place would implode if that didn't happen. ) CW
RuntheDamnBall Posted October 18, 2005 Posted October 18, 2005 You mean like people here are critical of a defense that only gave up 13 points against the Jags last year...? Or a defense that only gave up 17 points against the Jets this week...? Or a defense that only gave up 19 points to both the Bucs and Saints...? Oh, that's different, it's Buffalo - we're allowed to be critical of our own team (in fact, this place would implode if that didn't happen. ) CW 479758[/snapback] Weren't we all critical of both? Lord knows many of us were screaming about the offense in the Jax game. (BTW: 23 points in the Bucs game.) I'm saying, don't reserve criticism for one and not the other. They won a 16-13 game, the defense held a pretty high flying team down and Bledsoe did just enough to win. Both sides made mistakes, Bledsoe isn't God and the defense wasn't terrible and vice versa.
Recommended Posts