billsfanone Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 That was him right? So he's a TE now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 No, Wide Receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfanone Posted October 10, 2005 Author Share Posted October 10, 2005 Wasn't Sam Adams lined up as WR on goaline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Wasn't Sam Adams lined up as WR on goaline. 471900[/snapback] Yeah, but he reverted to DT "bat the ball down" mode when it was actually thrown to him...good thing he was held. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfanone Posted October 10, 2005 Author Share Posted October 10, 2005 Yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye Eric Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Stats indicate that Peters also got a defensive assist, must have been on a kickoff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Stats indicate that Peters also got a defensive assist, must have been on a kickoff. 471976[/snapback] I remember that play. He was the nickel back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Nice to see a little better play calling on offense this week. Actually using TEs as receivers, using Peters, etc. Maybe they should have tried some of this the last 3 weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
todd Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 If peters plays, and is numbered as a TE, does he have to report as tackle-eligible? Maybe that's why they changed his number - so they don't have to bring attention to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 If peters plays, and is numbered as a TE, does he have to report as tackle-eligible? Maybe that's why they changed his number - so they don't have to bring attention to him. 472067[/snapback] Yeah, I mentioned that in another thread...oops, it's over in the OT forum...Probably more to avoid flags than calling attention to him...he's kinda hard to miss lined up as a 6th OL... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Yeah, I mentioned that in another thread...oops, it's over in the OT forum...Probably more to avoid flags than calling attention to him...he's kinda hard to miss lined up as a 6th OL... 472079[/snapback] I was told Euhus is out and they had Peters listed as a TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts