zow2 Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 I was really excited when we signed him, but I was torn about starting him this week.....I'm thrilled at the decision now, though....this feels so damn good! 470509[/snapback] His arm is like a wet noodle but who cares when you have a career 63% completion % and today he is hitting on more than that.
ajzepp Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 His arm is like a wet noodle but who cares when you have a career 63% completion % and today he is hitting on more than that. 470514[/snapback] yep, any day Moorman gets the day off is a good day Holcomb rules!
KRT88 Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 Impressive responce by Miami. Come on D hold em to a FG or take the ball away!
ajzepp Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 AAAAAAAAHHHHHHH HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OUR D IS BACK, BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!
Louie Armstrong Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 Kudos to those of us who thought Holcomb should start this week. He gave us the best chance of WINNING, and its showing. GO BILLS!!!!!!!
Buffan00 Posted October 9, 2005 Author Posted October 9, 2005 Kudos to those of us who thought Holcomb should start this week. He gave us the best chance of WINNING, and its showing. GO BILLS!!!!!!! 470520[/snapback] Yep, it'll be interesting to see what the "critics" say this week!
zow2 Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 Gosh our run D is soft this year,,,,right up the gut.
ajzepp Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 AHHHHHHHHHHHHH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 TROY VINCENT RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Brandon Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 I still think its the wrong move. Holcomb is playing well, but I question whether it will last and even if it does, if the team can make the playoffs. In the end, if they miss the playoffs, we'd have been better off starting Losman, even if it means winning 4 games instead of 8. Either way, the Bills are at home in January. Of course, if Holcomb can maintain a high level of play and the Bills make the playoffs, its a different story, but one half of football is not nearly enough to change my opinion of the move.
Buffan00 Posted October 9, 2005 Author Posted October 9, 2005 I still think its the wrong move. Holcomb is playing well, but I question whether it will last and even if it does, if the team can make the playoffs. In the end, if they miss the playoffs, we'd have been better off starting Losman, even if it means winning 4 games instead of 8. Either way, the Bills are at home in January. Of course, if Holcomb can maintain a high level of play and the Bills make the playoffs, its a different story, but one half of football is not nearly enough to change my opinion of the move. 470525[/snapback]
ajzepp Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 I still think its the wrong move. Holcomb is playing well, but I question whether it will last and even if it does, if the team can make the playoffs. In the end, if they miss the playoffs, we'd have been better off starting Losman, even if it means winning 4 games instead of 8. Either way, the Bills are at home in January. Of course, if Holcomb can maintain a high level of play and the Bills make the playoffs, its a different story, but one half of football is not nearly enough to change my opinion of the move. 470525[/snapback] Listen, this is the kind of thing we needed Bledsoe to do.....If Holcomb can get it done and avoid the game screwing fumbles and picks that Drew threw, we're golden.....There is nothing JP woudl have done this first half that could have made this any better. For all we know, Holcomb will shine in the offense and he'll be the guy we go to for the next year or two.....THIS IS WHAT WE NEED OUR QB TO DO!!!
zow2 Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 I still think its the wrong move. Holcomb is playing well, but I question whether it will last and even if it does, if the team can make the playoffs. In the end, if they miss the playoffs, we'd have been better off starting Losman, even if it means winning 4 games instead of 8. Either way, the Bills are at home in January. Of course, if Holcomb can maintain a high level of play and the Bills make the playoffs, its a different story, but one half of football is not nearly enough to change my opinion of the move. 470525[/snapback] On the contrary,,,we could have beaten ATL & NO if they started KH earlier. I don't understand your thinking at all? The NFL is about winning. NOt throwing your season away to develop a young guy that isn't showing anything. The team has a duty to play the best players now.
Buffan00 Posted October 9, 2005 Author Posted October 9, 2005 OMG....you need a smack.... Listen, this is the kind of thing we needed Bledsoe to do.....If Holcomb can get it done and avoid the game screwing fumbles and picks that Drew threw, we're golden.....There is nothing JP woudl have done this first half that could have made this any better. For all we know, Holcomb will shine in the offense and he'll be the guy we go to for the next year or two.....THIS IS WHAT WE NEED OUR QB TO DO!!! 470527[/snapback] Right on!!!
Brandon Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 Listen, this is the kind of thing we needed Bledsoe to do.....If Holcomb can get it done and avoid the game screwing fumbles and picks that Drew threw, we're golden.....There is nothing JP woudl have done this first half that could have made this any better. For all we know, Holcomb will shine in the offense and he'll be the guy we go to for the next year or two.....THIS IS WHAT WE NEED OUR QB TO DO!!! 470527[/snapback] As I said, Holcomb is playing better than Losman, at least for a half. But in the end, all I care about is making the playoffs and winning the Super Bowl. I'll settle for making the playoffs and if the Bills can do that with Holcomb, great and I'll say it was the right call. But I will not change my opinion of the decision to bench Losman until that happens. If we miss the playoffs anyway, we would have been better off getting Losman game experience.
SDS Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 as you guys discuss the game - remember to be good to one another...
ajzepp Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 As I said, Holcomb is playing better than Losman, at least for a half. But in the end, all I care about is making the playoffs and winning the Super Bowl. I'll settle for making the playoffs and if the Bills can do that with Holcomb, great and I'll say it was the right call. But I will not change my opinion of the decision to bench Losman until that happens. If we miss the playoffs anyway, we would have been better off getting Losman game experience. 470531[/snapback] Well, Holcomb is not going to do this every game, bro.....Even Brady has bad games from time to time. But this is the kind of QB play we've needed for this offense....He's spreading the ball around (6-7 receivers already), moving the chains, not turning it over, and letting Willis get his yards. The defense is getting plenty of time to rest and they're responding with a shutout. I'm not at the Ralph, and I don't have the live feed, but I would bet you MONEY that the fans there are applauding their asses off....maybe even a standing ovation.....This is turning into a great day!!
Simon Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 galdangit mularkey. The phish long-snapper has alread blown 2 snaps to the punter in a single half and you just passed up a prime opportunity to force another punt in their own end before halftime. 17 points leads are pretty and all but it doesn't mean you can take your foot off the gas. Keep working the game coach.
Buffan00 Posted October 9, 2005 Author Posted October 9, 2005 Well, Holcomb is not going to do this every game, bro.....Even Brady has bad games from time to time. But this is the kind of QB play we've needed for this offense....He's spreading the ball around (6-7 receivers already), moving the chains, not turning it over, and letting Willis get his yards. The defense is getting plenty of time to rest and they're responding with a shutout. I'm not at the Ralph, and I don't have the live feed, but I would bet you MONEY that the fans there are applauding their asses off....maybe even a standing ovation.....This is turning into a great day!! 470534[/snapback] Yep..a kick in the @ss, and the team rally's around Holcomb! Cant wait to see the second half!
Brandon Posted October 9, 2005 Posted October 9, 2005 Well, Holcomb is not going to do this every game, bro.....Even Brady has bad games from time to time. But this is the kind of QB play we've needed for this offense....He's spreading the ball around (6-7 receivers already), moving the chains, not turning it over, and letting Willis get his yards. The defense is getting plenty of time to rest and they're responding with a shutout. I'm not at the Ralph, and I don't have the live feed, but I would bet you MONEY that the fans there are applauding their asses off....maybe even a standing ovation.....This is turning into a great day!! 470534[/snapback] All I'm saying is that I'm not going to change my opinion based upon a half of football. I'll know in early January whether it was the right move or not. If they don't make the playoffs, we're back at square one for 2006 and have ultimately accomplished nothing in the 2005 season. That's not a knock against Holcomb, he's playing very well.
Recommended Posts