PIZ Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 04 -05 season TOTAL RUSH PASS TO TIME PENDATE OPP W/L SCORE FD-PLY-YDS AT-YDS CO--AT-YDS I--F POSS NO-YDS ---- --- - ----- -- --- --- -- --- -- -- --- - - ---- -- --- 09/12 JAC L 10-13 16 63 242 36 95 17 26 147 0 2 33:53 7 78 09/19 @OAK L 10-13 14 56 243 24 67 14 25 176 1 0 30:19 7 55 10/03 NWE L 17-31 18 63 337 27 123 18 30 214 1 1 31:17 11 94 10/10 @NYJ L 14-16 17 55 252 22 80 16 29 172 1 0 26:21 7 83 10/17 MIA W 20-13 18 60 341 31 137 15 28 204 0 0 32:00 7 60 10/24 @BAL L 6-20 15 64 270 23 85 20 37 185 4 1 30:52 5 40 10/31 ARI W 38-14 11 55 209 38 128 8 17 81 0 0 28:18 7 55 11/07 NYJ W 22-17 19 76 341 46 157 18 30 184 0 0 37:28 8 66 11/14 @NWE L 6-29 8 41 125 17 50 9 21 75 4 1 18:38 2 48 11/21 STL W 37-17 16 51 294 26 119 15 24 175 1 0 24:36 15 123 11/28 @SEA W 38-9 25 76 434 37 148 26 38 286 3 0 36:24 6 44 12/05 @MIA W 42-32 16 61 362 28 105 19 30 257 0 1 29:41 11 73 12/12 CLE W 37-7 22 73 321 42 215 13 30 106 1 2 36:55 7 37 12/19 @CIN W 33-17 13 61 212 29 43 15 30 169 0 1 28:57 4 37 12/26 @SFO W 41-7 27 73 441 36 226 23 36 215 0 1 34:57 5 46 01/02 PIT L 24-29 16 54 267 21 96 16 30 171 1 2 24:57 12 108 AVERAGE 25-18 17 61 293 30 117 16 29 176 1 1 30:36 8 65 AVG YDS/PLAY 4.8 AVG YDS/RUSH 3.9 AVG YDS/PASS 6.1 FD = First Downs TO = Turnover I = Interceptions F = Fumbles The only thing missing is playing like a team. You don't need the best athletes or even the best at any position. If they play like a team, they'll win.
BillsObserver Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 04 -05 season The only thing missing is playing like a team. You don't need the best athletes or even the best at any position. If they play like a team, they'll win. 458118[/snapback] and if JP throws it within 10 yards of the receiver. seriously, i agree. if JP settles in, we'll be somewhat okay. let's see what happens this week - could be a good start.
Mark VI Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Point taken but we don't have the rare soft schedule that comes along once every 30 years, like we did in 2004. We caught a lot of down teams playing their worst football of the year during that 6 game winning streak. That was then. This is now. Circle the wagons.
34-78-83 Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Point taken but we don't have the rare soft schedule that comes along once every 30 years, like we did in 2004. We caught a lot of down teams playing their worst football of the year during that 6 game winning streak. That was then. This is now. Circle the wagons. 458135[/snapback] Another thing is that it wasn't such a "soft" schedule til after the season was over. If I remember correctly it was the 2nd or 3rd most difficult schedule in the league based on winning percentages.
Bill from NYC Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Yes, and both seasons we were awaiting a healthy Mike Williams. This time however we don't have Travis Henry to bench.
Kelly the Dog Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Point taken but we don't have the rare soft schedule that comes along once every 30 years, like we did in 2004. We caught a lot of down teams playing their worst football of the year during that 6 game winning streak. That was then. This is now. Circle the wagons. 458135[/snapback] Not really true. The Seahawks, for example, had won the previous week and three of their last four. The Rams had won the week before. The Jets were 6-1 when they lost to the Bills and had won the week before. The Cards had won the week before. The Bengals had lost the week before to the Pats by a TD but had won four of their last five before that. Even the Dolphins had won the previous week, and then two of the next three after. Only the pitiful Browns and 49ers were playing their worst ball and we beat them by 30 points.
BRH Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Not really true. The Seahawks, for example, had won the previous week and three of their last four. The Rams had won the week before. The Jets were 6-1 when they lost to the Bills and had won the week before. The Cards had won the week before. The Bengals had lost the week before to the Pats by a TD but had won four of their last five before that. Even the Dolphins had won the previous week, and then two of the next three after. Only the pitiful Browns and 49ers were playing their worst ball and we beat them by 30 points. 458161[/snapback] Man. Facts suck.
jdubs Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 yea we started winning cuz of the cheeseburgers!
Mark VI Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Not really true. The Seahawks, for example, had won the previous week and three of their last four. The Rams had won the week before. The Jets were 6-1 when they lost to the Bills and had won the week before. The Cards had won the week before. The Bengals had lost the week before to the Pats by a TD but had won four of their last five before that. Even the Dolphins had won the previous week, and then two of the next three after. Only the pitiful Browns and 49ers were playing their worst ball and we beat them by 30 points. 458161[/snapback] I stand corrected. Seattle was an absolute POWERHOUSE and lost 38-9. The WR's must have dropped 12 passes that day . The Cards, Browns and Rams are known road warriors. Check their record. SanFran won 2 games. The Fins won 4. Why didn't they beat us ? They were " hot " . Cinci had Carson Palmer out and the 2nd stringer looked like Losman against the Bucs. Heck, lets check their combined records on the year. How many of them won 9 games, like we did ? They sure played their best football against us.
eball Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Yes, and both seasons we were awaiting a healthy Mike Williams. This time however we don't have Travis Henry to bench. 458157[/snapback] we could bench teague and put duke in there (he says, only half-kidding)....
BB2004 Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 04 -05 season The only thing missing is playing like a team. You don't need the best athletes or even the best at any position. If they play like a team, they'll win. 458118[/snapback] The situation is much different this year with our quarterback. But you're right, if they play like a team they can win. Playoffs? Well, at least it's not out of the question at this point.
tjwbills Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Plus we lost close games during that 0-4 start last year. The way we're playing offensively right now is not competitive by NFL standards.
Kelly the Dog Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 I stand corrected. Seattle was an absolute POWERHOUSE and lost 38-9. The WR's must have dropped 12 passes that day . The Cards, Browns and Rams are known road warriors. Check their record. SanFran won 2 games. The Fins won 4. Why didn't they beat us ? They were " hot " . Cinci had Carson Palmer out and the 2nd stringer looked like Losman against the Bucs. Heck, lets check their combined records on the year. How many of them won 9 games, like we did ? They sure played their best football against us. 458199[/snapback] Hey, all you said was they were playing their worst football of the season when they played us. I refuted that, and showed you why. They were playing their best football when they played us. I didn't say they didn't suck.
Mark VI Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 you said was they were playing their worst football of the season when they played us. 458208[/snapback] They did play their worst football games of the year, WHEN THEY PLAYED US. I wasn't alluding to their games prior to that. The one exception may have been the Dolphins, who did manage to score 32.
Kelly the Dog Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 They did play their worst football games of the year, WHEN THEY PLAYED US. I wasn't alluding to their games prior to that. The one exception may have been the Dolphins, who did manage to score 32. 458210[/snapback] But it was because we were such a powerhouse.
34-78-83 Posted September 29, 2005 Posted September 29, 2005 I stand corrected. Seattle was an absolute POWERHOUSE and lost 38-9. The WR's must have dropped 12 passes that day . The Cards, Browns and Rams are known road warriors. Check their record. SanFran won 2 games. The Fins won 4. Why didn't they beat us ? They were " hot " . Cinci had Carson Palmer out and the 2nd stringer looked like Losman against the Bucs. Heck, lets check their combined records on the year. How many of them won 9 games, like we did ? They sure played their best football against us. 458199[/snapback] http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showt...52entry458152
Rico Posted September 29, 2005 Posted September 29, 2005 Saints in S.A., Miami, Jets, at Raiders... not bad at all. Bucs & Falcons look a whole lot tougher so far than these 4 teams. The Bills could easily be 5-2 going into the Pats game if everyone steps up... it could happen!
Recommended Posts