Food_Pyramid_Wrong Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Jason Peters at OLB. No brainer
Rubes Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Nonsense. The man hsa enough size and speed for the middle. Move Fletcher to OLB and pop Peters in the middle. Opponents rushing yardage will plummet.
stuckincincy Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Nonsense. The man hsa enough size and speed for the middle. Move Fletcher to OLB and pop Peters in the middle. Opponents rushing yardage will plummet. 457936[/snapback] Since it's fun to play with other people's toys, how about moving Denny to OLB?
JinVA Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Since it's fun to play with other people's toys, how about moving Denny to OLB? 457969[/snapback] Because dummy, he'll be too winded from filling in for winded o-linemen.
stuckincincy Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Because dummy, he'll be too winded from filling in for winded o-linemen. 457978[/snapback] Ahh, I see. The Bills need more blow.
RJsackedagain Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Ahh, I see. The Bills need more blow. 457989[/snapback] does that mean we should re-acquire Travis???
DeeRay Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 we need more important things, such as a "punt catcher" to spell Nate and Freddie.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Why not peters at DT? I mean, he's big and quick.
Bill from NYC Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 Why not peters at DT? I mean, he's big and quick. 458084[/snapback] Because if he really can play LT, he will cost a few hundred thousand per year as opposed to the 7 or 8 million that many of these guys are paid. Also, he would be the perfect candidate for an extension as well. Imo, as long as there is any chance that he can play LT, this is where he should take his snaps.
Recommended Posts