tallahasseetuck Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 Is it me or didn't he just look BEATEN today - more than I've ever seen him. Still, I feel better bemonaing the fact that we are medicre while developing the future rather than retreading the old tire. If it takes 6-10, 7-9 to become a playoff team, so be it.
Thurmal34 Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 Is it me or didn't he just look BEATEN today - more than I've ever seen him. Still, I feel better bemonaing the fact that we are medicre while developing the future rather than retreading the old tire. If it takes 6-10, 7-9 to become a playoff team, so be it. 454369[/snapback] IMO, I would take 0-16 with Losman just to simply never have to watch another game with Drew Bledsoe as the QB of the Bills.
JayFromDC Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 I'd rather be 0-3 with Losman than to watch a statue play Quarterback
Fezmid Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 I'd rather be 0-3 with Losman than to watch a statue play Quarterback 454415[/snapback] Well with fans like you, the Bills are set.
Rico Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 Obviously 1-2 with Losman, there's still a future & we're 1-0 in the Conference.
Fezmid Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 I could live with 0-3 if I knew we had a good OL that was going to start dominating the game... But we don't, and they won't, so I'd rather be 2-1 with anyone (or 3-0 with anyone). CW
grabowr30045 Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 3-0 with who cares at QB. 454377[/snapback] That's the best post of the night. If the QB instills hope and "helps" win us ball games, then Bledose, Losman whomever. One problem: we're not 3-0 with the current QB. "
MDH Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 My real preferance is to not have the board filled with speculation on how posters think the Bills would be doing with Bledsoe at the helm...
finknottle Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 Is it me or didn't he just look BEATEN today - more than I've ever seen him. Still, I feel better bemonaing the fact that we are medicre while developing the future rather than retreading the old tire. If it takes 6-10, 7-9 to become a playoff team, so be it. 454369[/snapback] What if it's 6-10 or even 5-11? What if he is poor but not awfull? How do we approach the situation next year? With another mulligan? He might be the next Kyle Boller. There is something to be said about playing the best players ready in the here and now...
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 3-0 with who cares at QB. 454377[/snapback] SPOT ON
Buffal0 Bill5 Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 I'm not a Bledsoe hater, but it's history. Let it go.
Rico Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 JP didn't play well, but we'd still be 1-2 if Drew was starting... this is exactly the kind of game he lost for us in the past.
jarthur31 Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 Is it me or didn't he just look BEATEN today - more than I've ever seen him. Still, I feel better bemonaing the fact that we are medicre while developing the future rather than retreading the old tire. If it takes 6-10, 7-9 to become a playoff team, so be it. 454369[/snapback] I'll take the playoffs anyday. JP isn't leading us there this year. And he knows it.
MDH Posted September 26, 2005 Posted September 26, 2005 I'll take the playoffs anyday. JP isn't leading us there this year. And he knows it. 454543[/snapback] Bledsoe didn't take us to the playoffs the past 3 years and that was with the D playing very good/great during the majority of those years. Somehow Bledsoe is going to lead us to the playoffs this year when the D is playing like sh-- when he didn't do it before? I just don't get the reasoning here.
Recommended Posts