buffaloboyinATL Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Not sure if that is this year or for his career. I think we will get a lot of pressure on him if he plays and if London Fletcher is in the game and healthy. I believe we need his speed to help contain Vick. Doesn't seem like we're getting too much respect down here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campy Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Not sure if that is this year or for his career. I think we will get a lot of pressure on him if he plays and if London Fletcher is in the game and healthy. I believe we need his speed to help contain Vick. Doesn't seem like we're getting too much respect down here. 449661[/snapback] I follow, I hope Fletch can go too, but I think (I'm guessing) that the fastest LB is Posey. I know he's OLB, but I wouldn't be surprised if they use him in a lot of short zone-type drops to keep an eye on Vick. Disclaimer: I seem to think a little more highly of Posey than many of my Bills fan bretheren (and sisteren), so feel free to flame away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
todd Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Not sure if that is this year or for his career. I think we will get a lot of pressure on him if he plays and if London Fletcher is in the game and healthy. I believe we need his speed to help contain Vick. Doesn't seem like we're getting too much respect down here. 449661[/snapback] Keep in mind that running out of bounds behind the line of scrimmage is considered a sack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Keep in mind that running out of bounds behind the line of scrimmage is considered a sack. 449669[/snapback] How could we forget? That was RJ's specialty... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted September 21, 2005 Author Share Posted September 21, 2005 Keep in mind that running out of bounds behind the line of scrimmage is considered a sack. 449669[/snapback] and running out of the endzone is a safety. Doh. We'll take cheapo sacks if it means Vick is contained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Not sure if that is this year or for his career. I think we will get a lot of pressure on him if he plays and if London Fletcher is in the game and healthy. I believe we need his speed to help contain Vick. Doesn't seem like we're getting too much respect down here. 449661[/snapback] Vick is a statue! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Yes that's correct. Vicks problem is he doesn't trust his receivers and will run around looking for a seam to run through rather than throw the ball. So he takes a lot of sacks playing Barry Sanders in the backfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Yeah, I can't stand a QB whose team was 11 and 5 last year, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrobot Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I think we'll be spelling Vick S-C-H-A-U-B for most of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts