The_Real Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Stat searching for fantasy I found some interesting numbers on Travis Henry. 28 carries for 94 yards. 3.5 average and aaaaahhhh yes a fumble. Not exactly star tailback numbers are they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Stat searching for fantasy I found some interesting numbers on Travis Henry. 28 carries for 94 yards. 3.5 average and aaaaahhhh yes a fumble. Not exactly star tailback numbers are they? 448901[/snapback] Willis McGahee season stats 2005: 1800 yards 18 td's. Well why don't you tap your guy Willis who has 35 carries for 151yards, 4.3 average - the longest 17 yards and NO Touchdowns and remind him that he's got only 14 games left to get 1,649 yards and 18 touchdowns to keep your signature valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Stat searching for fantasy I found some interesting numbers on Travis Henry. 28 carries for 94 yards. 3.5 average and aaaaahhhh yes a fumble. Not exactly star tailback numbers are they? 448901[/snapback] Against the Steelers and Ravens. Pretty good defenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 this has the makings of a good thread. bill in NYC? VA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Against the Steelers and Ravens. Pretty good defenses. 448921[/snapback] He would have kickass numbers if he was playing against the Redskins and the Chargers. They suck. Couldn't resist! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 He would have kickass numbers if he was playing against the Redskins and the Chargers. They suck. Couldn't resist! 448929[/snapback] damn that was FAST! looks like you're the leadoff hitter, bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 damn that was FAST! looks like you're the leadoff hitter, bill. 448930[/snapback] Yeah, it was kind of quick. I've been in a good mood lately, due in part to October 9 being right around the corner! I just can't wait to get to RWS and see the gang once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finknottle Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Against the Steelers and Ravens. Pretty good defenses. 448921[/snapback] And Henry doesn't have anything near the supporting threats in the passing game that WM does. I've never been a TH fan, but two games into the season I have to say his performances look better. (Fortunately, it is only two games so it doesn't mean squat.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven in MD Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 TH is the backup back too. Besides, TH could rush for 1200 yds and have 5 TDs and it will be hard to sell it on this board that WM was not the right choice. This is like RJ and DF. Regardless how well DF played in San Diego, RJ was our choice, and it was right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Real Posted September 21, 2005 Author Share Posted September 21, 2005 TH is the backup back too. Besides, TH could rush for 1200 yds and have 5 TDs and it will be hard to sell it on this board that WM was not the right choice. This is like RJ and DF. Regardless how well DF played in San Diego, RJ was our choice, and it was right. 449644[/snapback] Is he the back up? I see he is leading the team in attempts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Yeah, it was kind of quick. I've been in a good mood lately, due in part to October 9 being right around the corner! I just can't wait to get to RWS and see the gang once again. 448939[/snapback] will you have your Travis Henry jersey on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven in MD Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Is he the back up? I see he is leading the team in attempts. 449645[/snapback] They list Chris Brown as the starter....I think TH is just a better back than Brown so he gets more carries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finknottle Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 They list Chris Brown as the starter....I think TH is just a better back than Brown so he gets more carries. 449652[/snapback] I think Chris Brown is coming off an injury and has a history of injuries (hence signing TH), so they are building up his workload gradually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billrooter Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I agree henry could end up being the better back, but chris brown has like ten less carries or so and more yards! I checked out the stats after last weekends games so i don'thave the exacts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 In tempo with today's placing blame on outside forces, I blame Ritalin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Against the Steelers and Ravens. Pretty good defenses. 448921[/snapback] Except Chris Brown the starter has a 5.1 YPC average. But alas he too has a fumble. But 3 catches for 25 yards and alas also no TD's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
todd Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 TH is the backup back too. Besides, TH could rush for 1200 yds and have 5 TDs and it will be hard to sell it on this board that WM was not the right choice. 449644[/snapback] Whatever. Here's your MO: Whoever the Bills released is better than who they have. Grow up, Steven. It's getting really effen old. The truth is it wouldn't matter WHO the Bills signed or released. To you, it would be wrong. Which is nuts. You've been the same for years, so I don't expect you to change, but it's beyond funny now. It's a pathology for you. Seek counseling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven in MD Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 Whatever. Here's your MO: Whoever the Bills released is better than who they have. Grow up, Steven. It's getting really effen old. The truth is it wouldn't matter WHO the Bills signed or released. To you, it would be wrong. Which is nuts. You've been the same for years, so I don't expect you to change, but it's beyond funny now. It's a pathology for you. Seek counseling. 449902[/snapback] All I am saying is that if we made a mistake and released the wrong player, or did not resign the player we needed, would people admit it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 All I am saying is that if we made a mistake and released the wrong player, or did not resign the player we needed, would people admit it? 450031[/snapback] HA! Never. But even if Willis doesn't pan out, I don't think you can look at it as a cut and dry "wrong player" decision. Why? Because I don't think Travis is really the kind of back that can take a team to a championship. Willis absolutely has more talent and potential, and based on last year, he has the ability to live up to it. Whether he does for the rest of his career remains to be seen, but you have to take some risks and get a little lucky to have a title run, so that's why it was the right decision to go with the guy who might be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven in MD Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 HA! Never. But even if Willis doesn't pan out, I don't think you can look at it as a cut and dry "wrong player" decision. Why? Because I don't think Travis is really the kind of back that can take a team to a championship. Willis absolutely has more talent and potential, and based on last year, he has the ability to live up to it. Whether he does for the rest of his career remains to be seen, but you have to take some risks and get a little lucky to have a title run, so that's why it was the right decision to go with the guy who might be great. 450038[/snapback] I agree....but could TD kept the both? Could the situation been handled differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts