Rubes Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 ...is now the #2 defense in the NFL. Of course, that's primarily due to the new #1 defense in the NFL. Had our offense been able to generate anything, then we might have continued to be #1...
Mark VI Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 Atlanta gives up a lot of yardage and their All-Hype QB is running like DB at the moment. Ripe for the picking.
respk Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 Ah yes another writer who blames the poor play of the defense against a decent offense on the Bills offense. I didn't see anybody on the offense missing tackles, or getting blown off the ball, or playing out of position. But you know your probably right it was Bledsoe's fault. Every time the defense opens their mouth and touts how good they are it only emphasizes the poor performances they have had against any decent offensive team.
bobblehead Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 I didn't see anybody on the offense missing tackles, or getting blown off the ball, or playing out of position448110[/snapback] Partly because they were only on the field for 21 minutes and 10 seconds.
gantrules Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 1st against the pass, 30th against the run. I wonder what the Falcs will be doing on Sunday?
ganesh Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 One of the disturbing facts in that stat is our D is 10/24 on 3rd downs.. that is a whopping 41%.....The D has to get off the field on 3rd and longs....
R. Rich Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 1st against the pass, 30th against the run. I wonder what the Falcs will be doing on Sunday? 448123[/snapback] Probably more of the same thing they did last year, when they were among the top rushing teams in football.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 Probably more of the same thing they did last year, when they were among the top rushing teams in football. Not if Vick is hurting. He had about 1/3 of those yards.
stuckincincy Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 Probably more of the same thing they did last year, when they were among the top rushing teams in football. 448214[/snapback] Duckett is dangerous inside the 10.
pkwwjd Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 Duckett is dangerous inside the 10. 448218[/snapback] They won't be inside the 10 -- unless you speak of their own 10
stuckincincy Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 They won't be inside the 10 -- unless you speak of their own 10 448223[/snapback] Hope springs eternal.
Rubes Posted September 20, 2005 Author Posted September 20, 2005 Ah yes another writer who blames the poor play of the defense against a decent offense on the Bills offense. I didn't see anybody on the offense missing tackles, or getting blown off the ball, or playing out of position. But you know your probably right it was Bledsoe's fault. Every time the defense opens their mouth and touts how good they are it only emphasizes the poor performances they have had against any decent offensive team. 448110[/snapback] Ah yes, another writer who knows more than everybody else. I sure as hell don't think the defense played a great game, but I still think the defense would have been better if the offense had done anything to stay on the field longer. You don't agree? Who cares.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 Ah yes, another writer who knows more than everybody else. I sure as hell don't think the defense played a great game, but I still think the defense would have been better if the offense had done anything to stay on the field longer. You don't agree? Who cares. The defense would have played a lot better is a) Fletcher didn't get hurt and b) the offense was able to sustain drives. It would have been nice if the ST's from last year showed up as well.
finknottle Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 One of the disturbing facts in that stat is our D is 10/24 on 3rd downs..that is a whopping 41%.....The D has to get off the field on 3rd and longs.... 448206[/snapback] This is why I think people need to quit thumping their chests about our defensive rank. Last year our vaunted #2 defense was 36% on 3rd down, only 13th in the league. We were a good defense, but not a great one, as evidenced by several key collapses.
SilverNRed Posted September 21, 2005 Posted September 21, 2005 Partly because they were only on the field for 21 minutes and 10 seconds. 448120[/snapback] BINGO. It's tough for the defense to stop anyone when they're on the field for the entire game. 1-2-3-and-out from the offense isn't helping.
The Jokeman Posted September 21, 2005 Posted September 21, 2005 The defense would have played a lot better is a) Fletcher didn't get hurt and b) the offense was able to sustain drives. It would have been nice if the ST's from last year showed up as well. 448266[/snapback] [sARCASM]Come on everyone knows the real reason our defense is so bad is because we let Antoine Winfield, Pat Williams, Sam Cowart, Keith Newman, Ken Irvin and Ted Cotrell get away and sign with Minnesota.[/sARCASM]
Recommended Posts